韓中海域劃界的爭議及其出路 = A suggestions of equitable solution on the maritime demarcation between South Korea and China

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study is to diagnose the current situation of seeing-China maritime delimitation puts the primary objective. In addition, try to look Analysis of the two countries" national legislative provisions applicable. Furthermore, to investigate the problem, conflict factors derived from the two countries put their differences between the secondary target.
Provisions of the United Nations Convention on the maritime delimitation is “determined based on the delimitation of the exclusive economic zone or continental shelf and adjacent coast,” it has stated. For the comprehensive application of these principles, the International Court of Justice Article 38 The provisions are limited and that, in principle, should be based on the provisions of international law. Therefore, it must be observed that Jane War also to resolve cross-border disputes shall be subject to the provisions of these international agreements when dealing with international maritime delimitation issues, inevitably expanded.
Nevertheless, South Korea and China have been faced with reality, and these factors linger in the meantime, conflicts and conflict by a different criterion for the maritime delimitation. There are two general remarks on the state figured consensus is that they must present a fair and amicable solution through negotiations in principle. However, in the particulars in terms of the bottom line that the two countries should seek to protect its interests we are still faced with difficulties. These ‘Hanzhong’ their differences in accordance with the interests of the two countries would result from the rational delimitation of the criteria for the area. In other words, South Korea, and insist the principle of equidistance / special circumstances", China is a situation that could not find a clue to adhere to the principle of fairness / relevant circumstances" and that negotiations by the two countries. The researchers were trying to determine under this topic will be found in overcoming the limitations of awareness about the clues to solve the problem of delimitation of the sea-China bilateral priority factor by comparison of the two criteria of analysis.
To study the demarcation dilemma in the exclusive economic zone and continental shelf, this thesis is divided into three parts. The first chapter discussed the demarcation theory of UNCLOS and its evolution, and studied cases of international maritime law, analyzed the current solutions of sea disputes among countries. The second chapter made a comparison and analysis of different weighting factors of the demarcation that South Korea and China insisted, and pointed out the factors that should be considered in the delimitation. Then, based on the analysis and the facts, for the purpose of bridge the differences and settle the dispute, feasible suggestions of equitable solution was put forward in the third chapter. According to the rule of international law, the two parties should consider the overall peace in Northeast Asia as a starting point, stop harming the two national people’s action, settle the maritime delimitation disputes peacefully.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 引言
• Ⅱ. ≪海洋法公約≫的劃界理論
• Ⅲ. 海域劃界的實踐
• Ⅳ. 韓中海域爭端公平解決的建議
• 結語
• 參考文獻
• 【논문초록】

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 양희철, "해양경계획정에서 지질 및 지형적요소의 효과에 관한 고찰" 한국해양과학기술원 29 (29): 55-67, 2007

2 曹玮, "韩国在争议海区“抢先下手”有失公平原则― ―从国际法角度评析韩国“作为”" (3) : 2012

3 金荣球, "韩国和海洋的国际法" (株)书21出版社 2004

4 Jong-Hwa, Choi, "韩中渔业协定实施的效果分析" 21 (21): 2009

5 高健军, "论冲绳海槽在中日东海大陆架划界中的作用"

6 Suk-Kyoon Kim, "见于际判例的海洋划界原则的小考" 21 (21): 2009

7 Park, Chanho, "联合国海洋法公约解说书Ⅰ" 私团法人海洋法论丛 2009

8 孔令杰, "联合国海洋法公约的完善" (1) : 2010

9 李令华, "海洋划界中的成比例概念及其有关案例" (2) : 2006

10 戈非, "我国政府对日韩共同开发东海大陆架协定持何立场？" (7) : 1996

11 李锡龙, "我国家和中国间海洋划定" 52 (52): 2007

12 何学武, "我国及周边海洋国家领海基点和基线的基本情况" (3) : 2008

13 Hyun-Soo Kim, "对罗马尼亚和乌克兰黑海划界案的分析及评价" 21 (21): 2009

14 Choi, Jin Mo, "对于中越渔业和海域划界协定的小考" 21 (21): 2006

15 Chang-Wee Lee, "对于中国海洋管辖权扩展政策的小考― ―以大陆架和专属经济区为中心" 20 (20): 2008

16 彭洁菡, "大陆架的权利基础：自然延伸与距离标准" (5) : 2010

17 Kim Yong Hwan, "基于国际法的对中国海洋界限及其划界方法的检讨" (23) : 2008

18 傅崐成, "国际海洋法― ―衡平划界论" 三民书局 1992

19 高健军, "国际海洋划界论― ―有关等距离/特殊情况规则的研究" 北京大学出版社 2005

20 袁古洁, "国际海洋划界的理论与实践" 法律出版社 2001

21 黄瑶等, "国际海洋划界司法实践的新动向― ―2012年孟家拉湾划界案评析" (12) : 2012

22 张华, "国际司法裁决中的海洋划界方法论解析" (6) : 2012

23 李令华, "关于领海基点和基线的确定问题" (3) : 2007

24 张卫彬, "公平原则及相关情况规则探讨― ―兼析中国东海大陆架划界基本主张" (1) : 2010

25 梁咏, "从国际法视角看中日东海大陆架争端" (8) : 2006

26 Park, C.G, "为东北亚地区协力的韩中海洋划界：以离与岛为中心" 20 (20): 2013

27 李军, "中韩相邻海洋权益问题研究" (12) : 2010

28 韩笑, "中日东海大陆架划界之探析" (1) : 2012

29 郑甲勇, "中日东中国海大陆架纠纷和我们的政策方向" 韩国海洋水产开发院 2006

30 傳成, "中国周边大陆架的划界方法与问题" (3) : 2004

31 Jeong, Mun-Seob, "东北亚地域的海洋纠纷和其含义" 2008

32 Choi, S.J, "东中国海韩中日资源开发竞争"

33 LIU Zhenmin, "The Basic Position of China on the Settlement of Maritime Disputes through Negotiations" (2) : 2005