RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      스포츠법상 불법행위책임에 관한 연구 = A Study on Liability for Illegal Acts in Sports Law

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A75066645

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      With the increase in a desire for healthy life and a sense of enjoying human life, sports activity of modern society has become one of necessary social and cultural tools. However, since sports are in substantial characterized by accomplishment orient...

      With the increase in a desire for healthy life and a sense of enjoying human life, sports activity of modern society has become one of necessary social and cultural tools. However, since sports are in substantial characterized by accomplishment orientation, competitiveness, high-difficulty technique, and challenge to the limitation of human faculty, they have high probability of serious or inevitable accidents.
      Under this circumstances, People's legal sense about their rights has been reinforced and victims increasingly seek their legal responsibility as a positive solution against offenders.
      However, considering the inherent value and essential danger of sports and peculiarities of sport events, it is not appropriate to apply a solution to dispute by a civil or criminal suit which deals with crimes or accidents in ordinary social relationship. For this reason, this study is intended to derive legal principles of protection and relief for victims and of reduction and exemption from responsibility for offenders in sport accidents caused by sports activity and participation on the assumption of comprehensive fundamental rights based on constitution and fundamental right of sports not listed. To achieve this goal, this study reviewed and analyzed domestic or international literatures, theses, academic seminar materials, and books.
      First, liability of illegal sports acts decides liability for the damage according to the following procedure based on the conformity rule of Art. 750 of the Civil Law. The objective of civil liability is to decide liability with its focus on victim's relief. To meet conditions of sports acts in terms of a principle of law, i)offender's deliberation and negligence of his/her harm shall be proved and ii)an act of actor with liability capacity, that is, an act of actor with discretion capacity constitutes an illegal act and has liable ability, When i) and ii) are met, the liability for damage is decided. If the act is very deliberate and harmful and has gross negligence, the scope of estimating damage shall be broadened.
      Second, in case supervisors such as sports teachers, directors, and coaches, or sports clubs and schools teachers are negligent in their attention duties, it shall constitute violation of supervisor's attention duties. resulting in supervisor's liability as special illegal act in accordance with Article 755 of the Civil Law. In particular, illegal sports acts related to sports activity which occur by a person without liability capacity(a minor provided in Article 753 and the non compos mentis in Article 754 of the Civil Law) constitute this case.
      Third. user's liability provided in Article 756 of the Civil Law defines a type of special illegal acts and acknowledges obligation to damage of sports coaches, government employees, and teachers as well as general company subjects,
      interpreting the scope of user's liability.
      In case accidents happen because of the fault of sports coaches, government employees, or teachers, they shall be primarily liable. User's liability is based on the principle of compensation liability that since users benefit from certain business, they should accept damage, and the principle of damage liability that a person making danger shall be responsible for the danger. But in case sports coaches work for public sports facilities or public schools. their liability shall be exempted in accordance with Article 756 of the Civil Law, and instead, state or public agencies shall bear compensation liability in accordance with Article 2 of the State Tort Liability Act.
      Finally, Article 758, Section 1 of the Civil Law defines structure liability that in case the establishment or fail to maintain of structure causes damage to
      others, the possessor of the structure shall be primarily liable and its owner shall be secondarily liable. Imposing a heavy duty to maintain safe state or minimize danger of structure including sports facilities or stadiums upon managers(owner·possessor) is based on the principle of danger liability that acknowledges possessor's no-fault liability about sports facilities. By taking full and complete care of maintaining sports facilities or stadiums with high danger and maintaining a safe condition in an aspect of architecture or technology of sports facilities. it guarantees sound and positive sports activity, meets policy concern, and realizes ideal social community life in terms of relief from accidents. By defining a duty of strict attention and supervision, owners and mangers of sports facilities will try to prevent danger and secure safety.
      In sports-related crimes·accidents. the first important purpose is to find out legal liability and give relief and protect victims. However, offenders could get into social and economic danger due to increase in economic burden caused by liability for damage or be branded as a criminal in society. Such recognition may be a great obstacle to the development and promotion of sports, impair the value or essence of sports, and even contract sports participation or activity. It is sure that legal liability should be strictly applied by civil·criminal interpretation of law about deliberation, negligence, and illegality in the level of th positive law in a constitutional state in order to secure social peace and public order and national, social, and individual benefit and protection of the law. However, from an angle of sports, given peculiarity and inherent danger of sports, the methods to reduce or exempt civil·criminal liability against tort need to be explored in order to minimize offender's economic damage, to secure his/her social and economic status, and to protect minimum human rights. The law principles of exemption are as follows.
      i) The principle of accepting danger(accepted danger)
      ii) Force majeure
      iii) The principle of reliance
      iv) The principle of self-fault
      v) a cause to exempt illegality
      For this case, the Civil Law has a provision of self-defense and emergent refugee(Article 761 of the Civil Law).
      Accordingly, it is reasonable to invoke a cause to exempt illegality provided in Article 20 and 24 of the Criminal Law(justifiable acts, self-defense, emergent refuge, self-help, and victim's consent) and Article 761 of the Civil Law(self-defense and emergent refuge) and apply as the principle of offender's exemption). However, in case severe accidents(e.g., death), infringement by gross negligence, or physical and property loss greatly breaks social established rules and acceptability, it shall be bear civil·criminal liability.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • I. 서론
      • II. 스포츠법상 불법행 위책임
      • III. 결론 및 제언
      • I. 서론
      • II. 스포츠법상 불법행 위책임
      • III. 결론 및 제언
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼