The annual average numbers of articles in the era of King Gongmin were 61 in the 「Sega(世家)」 in 〈Goryeosa (高麗史, History of Goryeo)〉 and 39 in the 〈Goryeosa Jeolyo (高麗史節要, Essentials of Goryeo History)〉 and thus the forme...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99771939
2013
Korean
KCI등재
학술저널
41-74(34쪽)
4
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
The annual average numbers of articles in the era of King Gongmin were 61 in the 「Sega(世家)」 in 〈Goryeosa (高麗史, History of Goryeo)〉 and 39 in the 〈Goryeosa Jeolyo (高麗史節要, Essentials of Goryeo History)〉 and thus the forme...
The annual average numbers of articles in the era of King Gongmin were 61 in the 「Sega(世家)」 in 〈Goryeosa (高麗史, History of Goryeo)〉 and 39 in the 〈Goryeosa Jeolyo (高麗史節要, Essentials of Goryeo History)〉 and thus the former was approximately 1.5 times of the latter. However, the increase and decrease in the number of articles over time of the former and the latter were generally proportional. The numbers of articles between the end of the 12th year and the 13th year of King Gongmin and between the end of the 14th year and the beginning of the 13th year of King Gongmin are much smaller compared to other periods because some of materials in original books were omitted or deleted in the complicated relationship with Yuan.
The most notable thing in the recording systems of the 「Sega(世家)」 and the 〈Goryeosa Jeolyo (高麗史節要, Essentials of Goryeo History)〉 is that whereas the daily sexagenary cycles were indicated in approximately 85% of articles in the former, the daily sexagenary cycles were indicated in only approximately 9% of articles in the latter. In the case of the 〈Goryeosa Jeolyo (高麗史節要, Essentials of Goryeo History)〉, the daily sexagenary cycles were mostly omitted because many articles gathered were synthesized and summarized because of the principle of ’‘summarization’.
Articles beginning with ‘this month’ or ‘this year’ were those for events that clearly occurred in the month or year but could not be dated to certain days. However, among the entire articles for the era of King Gongmin, the number of those beginning with ‘this month’ was only 8 and the number of those beginning with ‘this year’ was only 3. The reason why articles related to Hwanjo(桓祖) were included in the extremely small numbers of ‘this month(是月)’ and ‘this year(是年)’ articles was that the articles related to Hwanjo(桓祖) were added when ‘Goryeo History’ was complied in the Joseon Dynasty period.
The Lee Seong-Gye related articles contained in the 「Sega(世家)」 and the 〈Goryeosa Jeolyo (高麗史節要, Essentials of Goryeo History)〉 are almost the same as those in the 「Taejo Series(太祖總序)」 and excessively decorated the achievements of Lee Seong-Gye compared to the activities of persons in the era of King Gongmin recorded in the 「Biographies(列傳)」. As with the case of Hwanjo(桓祖) related articles, this was because the achievements of Lee Seong-Gye were unnaturally included in the 「Sega(世家)」 and the 〈Goryeosa Jeolyo (高麗史節要, Essentials of Goryeo History)〉.
The preface and messages in 〈Mokeunmungo(牧隱文藁)〉 were recorded in detail in 「Sega(世家)」 and briefly in the 〈Goryeosa Jeolyo (高麗史節要, Essentials of Goryeo History)〉. Cases where terms such as proclamation(宣旨) and royal messages(勅書) were irregularly changed in the process of converting the content of the anthology into articles in the 「Sega(世家)」 and the 〈Goryeosa Jeolyo (高麗史節要, Essentials of Goryeo History)〉 could be found. The reason for this is considered to be the confusion resulted from frequent changes in the principle of compilation of the ‘Goryeo History’ or the carelessness of compilers.
목차 (Table of Contents)
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 오항녕, "조선초기 『고려사』 개수에 관한 사학사적 검토" 16 : 1999
2 이익주, "이색의 삶과 생각" 일조각 2013
3 박재우, "고려전기 王命의 종류와 반포" 진단학회 (95) : 29-54, 2003
4 尹龍爀, "고려시대 사료량의 시기별 대비" 24 : 1986
5 최영호, "고려시대 묘지명과 고려사 열전의 서술형태" 한국중세사학회 (19) : 175-203, 2005
6 김광철, "고려사 편년화와 고려실록 체제의 재구성" 한국중세사학회 (30) : 149-185, 2011
7 최연식, "高麗時代 國王文書의 種類와 機能, In 韓國古代中世古文書硏究(下)" 서울대출판부 2000
8 閔賢九, "高麗政治史論" 고려대학교출판부 2004
9 金龍善, "高麗墓誌銘集成" 한림대 아시아문화연구소
10 韓永愚, "朝鮮前期史學史硏究" 서울대출판부 1981
1 오항녕, "조선초기 『고려사』 개수에 관한 사학사적 검토" 16 : 1999
2 이익주, "이색의 삶과 생각" 일조각 2013
3 박재우, "고려전기 王命의 종류와 반포" 진단학회 (95) : 29-54, 2003
4 尹龍爀, "고려시대 사료량의 시기별 대비" 24 : 1986
5 최영호, "고려시대 묘지명과 고려사 열전의 서술형태" 한국중세사학회 (19) : 175-203, 2005
6 김광철, "고려사 편년화와 고려실록 체제의 재구성" 한국중세사학회 (30) : 149-185, 2011
7 최연식, "高麗時代 國王文書의 種類와 機能, In 韓國古代中世古文書硏究(下)" 서울대출판부 2000
8 閔賢九, "高麗政治史論" 고려대학교출판부 2004
9 金龍善, "高麗墓誌銘集成" 한림대 아시아문화연구소
10 韓永愚, "朝鮮前期史學史硏究" 서울대출판부 1981
11 閔賢九, "新主(德興君)와 舊君(恭愍王)의 對決-元의 國王廢立 획책에 대한 高麗의 軍事的 대응, In 高麗政治史論" 고려대학교출판부 2004
12 박종기, "『국역 고려사』 완간과 학술적 의의" 석당학술원 (54) : 35-64, 2012
13 김광철, "『고려사』의 편찬과 간행, In 국역 고려사 1" 경인문화사 2008
14 김광철, "『고려사』의 간행 유통과 동아대 소장 『고려사』 판본의 특징" 석당학술원 (54) : 1-33, 2012
15 邊太燮, "『高麗國史』의 編纂內容과 史論" 3 : 1979
16 邊太燮, "『高麗史』의 연구" 삼양사 1975
17 邊太燮, "『高麗史』의 연구" 삼양사 1982
18 邊太燮, "『高麗史』의 연구" 삼양사 1982
19 崔在晉, "『高麗史』 列傳의 嬖幸傳 硏究" 2 : 1996
20 姜聲媛, "『高麗史』 列傳에 대한 分析的 考察" 17・18 : 1995
21 邊太燮, "『高麗史』 編纂에 있어서의 客觀性의 問題" 40 : 1975
22 張東翼, "『高麗史』 編纂過程에서 改書" 46 : 2010
23 朴龍雲, "『高麗史』 百官志 譯註" 신서원 2009
24 姜聲媛, "『高麗史』 叛逆傳의 分析" 13 (13): 1990
25 邊太燮, "≪高麗史≫・≪高麗史節要≫의 纂修凡例" 46 : 1984
26 韓永愚, "≪高麗史≫・≪高麗史節要≫의 比較硏究" 48 : 1979
『高麗史』 叛逆傳 立傳 기준과 고려말 조선초 ‘附元’ 인식
학술지 이력
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2027 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
2021-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | |
2018-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2015-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2011-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2009-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2007-02-06 | 학회명변경 | 영문명 : 미등록 -> The Society for the Studies of Korean History | |
2007-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2005-09-29 | 학술지명변경 | 외국어명 : 미등록 -> The Journal for the Studies of Korean History | |
2004-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | |
2003-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | |
2001-07-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) |
학술지 인용정보
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 1.28 | 1.28 | 1.11 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
0.97 | 0.89 | 2.254 | 0.21 |