RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      New Technology Venture and the Largest Shareholder in KOSDAQ Capital Market

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106055649

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This is because corporate governance is determined by the number of outstanding shares and corporate governance can control the management of the company. Corporate governance, which is funded and operated outside the enterprise in the capital market,...

      This is because corporate governance is determined by the number of outstanding shares and corporate governance can control the management of the company. Corporate governance, which is funded and operated outside the enterprise in the capital market, is heavily influenced by governance. In particular, companies with weak governance are becoming a prey of corporate hunters and are sacrificed. As capital markets are becoming globalized, corporate hunting in international capital markets is becoming more active. International speculative capital is especially focused on early entrepreneurs such as venture companies with weak corporate governance. In the decision-making process of major management decisions, the decision-making process of the general shareholders' meeting, which is the highest decision-making body, is subject to the ownership of shares. This study sought to define whether governance characteristics and the second largest shareholder (“the second shareholder”) can influence the relationship between the first shareholder and the manager's earnings management in a venture firm. The results of this study show that the relationship between the first largest shareholder and profit management of venture firms is not affected by the governance characteristics or the second largest shareholder. This study shows that the shareholding ratio of venture business owners is very high. In addition, the shareholding ratio of the second-largest shareholder is much smaller than that of the first-largest shareholder. In the end, the current corporate ownership system of venture firms does not adequately check and monitor the influence of the first largest shareholder on the management of the company. The results of this study are expected to stimulate various researches on venture capital investment and improvement of corporate governance.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 박범진, "코스닥 상장법인의 소유구조 및 사외이사와기업가치 간의 관련성 분석" 한국재무관리학회 24 (24): 45-73, 2007

      2 박범진, "소액주주의 감시가 이익조정에 미치는 영향" 한국산업경제학회 22 (22): 3009-3033, 2009

      3 전성일, "보상형 스톡옵션의 부여와 기업특성에 따른 이익조정 패턴" 한국증권학회 34 (34): 183-211, 2005

      4 선우석호, "대주주지분율이 코스닥 IPO 시장의 저평가에 미치는 영향" 한국중소기업학회 32 (32): 133-152, 2010

      5 Jensen, M., "Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure" 3 : 305-360, 1976

      6 Klassen, K., "The impact of inside ownership concentration on the trade-off between financial and tax reporting" 72 : 455-474, 1997

      7 Harris, D. G., "The impact of U.S. tax law revision on multinational corporations capital location and income-shifting decisions" 31 (31): 111-140, 1993

      8 Healy, P., "The effect of firms’ financial disclosure strategies on stock prices" 7 : 1-11, 1993

      9 Claessens, S., "The Separation of ownership and control in East Asian Corporations" 58 : 81-112, 2000

      10 Kim, Y. S., "The Relationship between Corporate Value and Ownership Structure" 26 : 173-197, 2000

      1 박범진, "코스닥 상장법인의 소유구조 및 사외이사와기업가치 간의 관련성 분석" 한국재무관리학회 24 (24): 45-73, 2007

      2 박범진, "소액주주의 감시가 이익조정에 미치는 영향" 한국산업경제학회 22 (22): 3009-3033, 2009

      3 전성일, "보상형 스톡옵션의 부여와 기업특성에 따른 이익조정 패턴" 한국증권학회 34 (34): 183-211, 2005

      4 선우석호, "대주주지분율이 코스닥 IPO 시장의 저평가에 미치는 영향" 한국중소기업학회 32 (32): 133-152, 2010

      5 Jensen, M., "Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure" 3 : 305-360, 1976

      6 Klassen, K., "The impact of inside ownership concentration on the trade-off between financial and tax reporting" 72 : 455-474, 1997

      7 Harris, D. G., "The impact of U.S. tax law revision on multinational corporations capital location and income-shifting decisions" 31 (31): 111-140, 1993

      8 Healy, P., "The effect of firms’ financial disclosure strategies on stock prices" 7 : 1-11, 1993

      9 Claessens, S., "The Separation of ownership and control in East Asian Corporations" 58 : 81-112, 2000

      10 Kim, Y. S., "The Relationship between Corporate Value and Ownership Structure" 26 : 173-197, 2000

      11 Berle, A. A., "The Modern Corporation and Private Property" Macmillan Publishing Company, Inc 1932

      12 Choi, J. H., "The Association between Audit Quality and Fees Paid to Audit Firms: Revisited" Seoul National University 2006

      13 Ronen, J., "Smoothing Income Numbers" Addison-Wesley Publishing Company 1981

      14 Chung, K. H., "Simple Approximation of Tobin's q" 23 : 70-74, 1994

      15 Fama, E., "Separation of ownership and control" 26 : 301-326, 1983

      16 Pound, J., "Proxy Contests and the Efficiency of Shareholder Oversight" 20 : 237-265, 1988

      17 Coombs, J. E., "Measuring Technological Capability and Performance" 36 : 421-438, 2006

      18 Morck. R., "Management Ownership and Market Valuation: An Empirical Analysis" 20 : 293-315, 1988

      19 Grabowski, H., "Industrial Research and Development, Intangibles Capital Stock, and Firm Profit Rates" 9 : 328-343, 1974

      20 DeFond, M., "Incidence and circumstances of accounting errors" 66 : 643-655, 1991

      21 Bertrand, M., "Ferreting out tunneling: an application to Indian business groups" 117 : 121-148, 2002

      22 Dempsey, S. J., "Earnings management and corporate ownership structure: An examination of extraordinary item reporting" 20 : 479-500, 1993

      23 Na, J. G., "Earnings Management in Insolvent Corporations and the Stock Market Response" 5 (5): 55-85, 2000

      24 Tucker, J. W., "Does Income Smoothing Improve Earnings Informativeness?" 81 : 251-270, 2006

      25 Shivakumar, L., "Do firms mislead investors by overstating earnings before seasoned equity offerings?" London Business School 1999

      26 Dechow, P., "Detecting earnings management" 170 : 193-225, 1995

      27 Kirschenheiter, M., "Can Big Bath and Earnings Smoothing Co-exist as Equilibrium Financial Reporting Strategies?" 40 : 761-796, 2002

      28 Eberhart, A., "An Examination of Long-Term Abnormal Stock Returns and Operating Performance Following R&D Increases" 59 : 623-649, 2004

      29 Hirshey, M., "Amortization Policy for Advertising and Research and Development Expenditures" 64 : 26-335, 1985

      30 De Angelo, H., "Accounting choices in troubled companies" 17 : 113-168, 1994

      31 Park, K. S., "A Study on the Relationship between Ownership Structure, Corporate Accounting Achievements, and Tobin's Q" 30 (30): 297-325, 2002

      32 Bae, K. S., "A Study on the Modulation Effect of the ERP System in Earnings Management" 10 (10): 325-354, 2005

      33 Scholes, M., "A Firm’s Responses to Anticipated Reductions in Tax Rates: The Tax Reform Act of 1986" 30 (30): 161-185, 1986

      34 조현우, "2대주주의 소유지분과 이익조정" 한국증권학회 35 (35): 103-139, 2006

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-02-25 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Korea International Accounting Review KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.76 0.76 0.85
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.88 0.85 1.497 0.23
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼