RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      敎育政策의 實際的 變遷에 관한 實證的 硏究  :  敎育豫算 彈性値 分析을 중심으로 = Analysis of Educational Policy Change in the View of Budgeting

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A19579140

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study aims to expose what is going on in educational policy change at a financial level for thirty years (1960-1990). Based upon this research questions' findings, we enabled to compare the planning with the implementation of educational developm...

      This study aims to expose what is going on in educational policy change at a financial level for thirty years (1960-1990). Based upon this research questions' findings, we enabled to compare the planning with the implementation of educational development programs.
      To analyze these research questions, this study uses data including educational budget and policy reports made by the ministry of education during 1960-1990. The educational budget data were analyzed with regression models using loglinear transformation.
      This study finds scale of educational budget to total government budget is a little elastic(elastic coefficient= 1.05). However, in the near future we cannot expect the amount of educational budget to increase as much as we need to make students' educational circumstances at an optimum level. This is because of "small government policy" in the sense of financial scale, which has helped Korean firms to accumulate capital through exemption from many kinds of taxation. We think the policy priority of economic and social development goals(esp. excellence of education) should be readjusted as soon as possible.
      The most important policy to our ministry of education during the last thirty years seems to increase the equal opportunity of education in terms of access. It is prior to other educational policy goals such as an equal opportunity of educational process, excellence of education etc.. What is surprising is that budget of special education for handicapped to total educational budget is quite unelastic(elastic coefficient =.870). Special education has to be supported more strongly if the ministry of education considers equality of education the most important policy goal.
      Regarding policy of excellence education, textbook compilation, budget and audio-visual education budget to total budget of the ministry of education are unelastic. Good textbooks and teaching methods are critical for a high quality of education. The ministry of education should concern these areas financially as well as nominally in order to improve the quality of education in an efficient way.
      Both the budget of vocational education(1.06) and that of social education(1.32) to total budget are elastic. The former seems to be considered very important in an economic sense and the latter in the sense of equality of educational opportunity for non-school population. However, the budgetary amount of vocational education should be increased much more in the near future. If not, the present proportion of highschool students of nonvocational school to vocational school(64 : 36) will not be able to be reverted to nominally aimed proportion(3 : 7). The lack of supply of workers in the Korean labor market today will not be loosened, either.
      What is more important among this study's findings is a gap between nominal policy goals and actual goals. That is in most educational policy fields we did not find statistically significant differences in terms of educational budget scale between years announced officially to be important and years not announced. These findings prove dual structure between educational planning and implementation. We argue planning and financial allocation to be consistent in order to get rid of educational planning divorced from implementation contexts, or implementation unhitched from some form of planning. Without strong links between the planning and implementation of educational development programs, we cannot achieve programs of educational development efficiently.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 硏究의 設計
      • 1. 問題의 提起
      • 2. 硏究의 設計
      • 가. 硏究의 目的
      • 나. 硏究의 內容
      • Ⅰ. 硏究의 設計
      • 1. 問題의 提起
      • 2. 硏究의 設計
      • 가. 硏究의 目的
      • 나. 硏究의 內容
      • 다. 硏究의 方法
      • (1) 調査 方法
      • (2) 分析 技法
      • 라. 硏究의 限界
      • Ⅱ. 敎育政策의 實際的 變遷에 관한 實證的 分析
      • 1. 敎育의 政策的 重要性
      • 가. GNP에 대한 敎育投資
      • 나. 政府豫算에 대한 敎育投資
      • 2. 敎育의 平等性
      • 가. 敎育 平等政策의 主流:入學機會의 均等
      • 나. 平等性 政策의 財政 執行 檢討
      • (1) 地域隔差 解消
      • (2) 特殊敎育
      • (3) 社會敎育
      • 3. 敎育의 秀越性
      • 가. 財政面에서 본 秀越性 政策의 흐름
      • 나. 秀越性 政策의 財政 執行 檢討
      • 4. 實業敎育
      • 가. 實業敎育 政策의 變化
      • 나. 實業敎育 政策의 財政 執行 檢討
      • Ⅲ. 結語:政策 提言
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼