RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      디지털 치열 모형에서 악궁 관계 지표 측정의 타당성 = Validity of Arch Relationship Measurements in Digital Dental Models

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108040232

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The aim of the present study is to evaluate the validity of orthodontic measurements including tooth width, Bolton ratio, overjet and overbite on the digital dental models. Dental models of the subjects aged 12 to 18 were obtained in 3 different forms...

      The aim of the present study is to evaluate the validity of orthodontic measurements including tooth width, Bolton ratio, overjet and overbite on the digital dental models.
      Dental models of the subjects aged 12 to 18 were obtained in 3 different forms, which were conventional stone model, digital model created with Freedom HD model scanner, and digital model produced with CS3600 intraoral scanner. After measurements were made on the models, reliability and reproducibility of the measurements were evaluated by using intraclass correlation coefficient, while validity was assessed with paired t-test.
      As a result, significant reliability and reproducibility were verified, with intraclass correlation coefficient exceeding 0.750 in all groups. Measurements of the model scanned group showed an adequate validity in overall and anterior Bolton ratio, overjet, and overbite. Intraoral scanned models showed an adequate validity in anterior Bolton ratio, and overjet.
      Measurement on intraoral scanned digital models can be considered as an alternative for young children who have difficulty in taking impression. Furthermore, careful considerations on measurement error should be made in clinical situations.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Whetten JL, "Variations in orthodontic treatment planning decisions of Class II patients between virtual 3-dimensional models and traditional plaster study models" 130 : 485-491, 2006

      2 Naidu D, "Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of the iOC intraoral scanner : a comparison of tooth widths and Bolton ratios" 144 : 304-310, 2013

      3 Stevens DR, "Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models : comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements" 129 : 794-803, 2006

      4 Wiranto MG, "Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of linear measurements on digital models obtained from intraoral and cone-beam computed tomography scans of alginate impressions" 143 : 140-147, 2013

      5 Burhardt L, "Treatment comfort, time perception, and preference for conventional and digital impression techniques : A comparative study in young patients" 150 : 261-267, 2016

      6 Othman SA, "Tooth-size discrepancy and Bolton’s ratios : a literature review" 33 : 45-51, 2006

      7 Davidowitz G, "The use of CAD/CAM in dentistry" 55 : 559-570, 2011

      8 Roberts CT, "The design and analysis of reliability studies for the use of epidemiological and audit indices in orthodontics" 24 : 139-147, 1997

      9 Foster TD, "The assessment of occlusal features for public health planning purposes" 69 : 83-90, 1976

      10 Houston WJ, "The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements" 83 : 382-390, 1983

      1 Whetten JL, "Variations in orthodontic treatment planning decisions of Class II patients between virtual 3-dimensional models and traditional plaster study models" 130 : 485-491, 2006

      2 Naidu D, "Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of the iOC intraoral scanner : a comparison of tooth widths and Bolton ratios" 144 : 304-310, 2013

      3 Stevens DR, "Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of plaster vs digital study models : comparison of peer assessment rating and Bolton analysis and their constituent measurements" 129 : 794-803, 2006

      4 Wiranto MG, "Validity, reliability, and reproducibility of linear measurements on digital models obtained from intraoral and cone-beam computed tomography scans of alginate impressions" 143 : 140-147, 2013

      5 Burhardt L, "Treatment comfort, time perception, and preference for conventional and digital impression techniques : A comparative study in young patients" 150 : 261-267, 2016

      6 Othman SA, "Tooth-size discrepancy and Bolton’s ratios : a literature review" 33 : 45-51, 2006

      7 Davidowitz G, "The use of CAD/CAM in dentistry" 55 : 559-570, 2011

      8 Roberts CT, "The design and analysis of reliability studies for the use of epidemiological and audit indices in orthodontics" 24 : 139-147, 1997

      9 Foster TD, "The assessment of occlusal features for public health planning purposes" 69 : 83-90, 1976

      10 Houston WJ, "The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements" 83 : 382-390, 1983

      11 de Waard O, "Reproducibility and accuracy of linear measurements on dental models derived from cone-beam computed tomography compared with digital dental casts" 146 : 328-336, 2014

      12 Shellhart WC, "Reliability of the Bolton tooth-size analysis when applied to crowded dentitions" 65 : 327-334, 1995

      13 Sharma R, "Prevalence of tooth size discrepancy among North Indian orthodontic patients" 2 : 170-175, 2011

      14 Flügge TV, "Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner" 144 : 471-478, 2013

      15 Kinaan BK, "Overjet and overbite distribution and correlation : a comparative epidemiological English-Iraqi study" 13 : 79-86, 1986

      16 Fleming PS, "Orthodontic measurements on digital study models compared with plaster models : a systematic review" 14 : 1-16, 2011

      17 Beyron HL, "Occlusal changes in adult dentition" 48 : 674-686, 1954

      18 Santoro M, "Mesiodistal crown dimensions and tooth size discrepancy of the permanent dentition of Dominican Americans" 70 : 303-307, 2000

      19 Guyatt G, "Measuring change over time : assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments" 40 : 171-178, 1987

      20 Hacker T, "Impact of procedures during prosthodontic treatment on patients’ perceived burdens" 43 : 51-57, 2015

      21 Park GH, "Feasibility of using an intraoral scanner for a complete-arch digital scan" 121 : 803-810, 2019

      22 Renne W, "Evaluation of the accuracy of 7 digital scanners : An in vitro analysis based on 3-dimensional comparisons" 118 : 36-42, 2017

      23 Abizadeh N, "Digital versus plaster study models : how accurate and reproducible are they?" 39 : 151-159, 2012

      24 Yilmaz H, "Digital versus conventional impression method in children : Comfort, preference and time" 29 : 728-735, 2019

      25 Plooij JM, "Digital three-dimensional image fusion processes for planning and evaluating orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. A systematic review" 40 : 341-352, 2011

      26 Rossini G, "Diagnostic accuracy and measurement sensitivity of digital models for orthodontic purposes : A systematic review" 149 : 161-170, 2016

      27 Hugo Lambert ; Jean-Cédric Durand ; Bruno Jacquot ; Michel Fages, "Dental biomaterials for chairside CAD/CAM: State of the art" 대한치과보철학회 9 (9): 486-495, 2017

      28 Rekow ED, "Dental CAD-CAM systems. What is the state of the art?" 122 : 42-48, 1991

      29 Kim J, "Comparison of experience curves between two 3-dimensional intraoral scanners" 116 : 221-230, 2016

      30 Burzynski JA, "Comparison of digital intraoral scanners and alginate impressions : Time and patient satisfaction" 153 : 534-541, 2018

      31 Lim JH, "Comparison of digital intraoral scanner reproducibility and image trueness considering repetitive experience" 119 : 225-232, 2018

      32 Nagy Z, "Comparing the trueness of seven intraoral scanners and a physical impression on dentate human maxilla by a novel method" 20 : 97-, 2020

      33 Grünheid T, "Clinical use of a direct chairside oral scanner : an assessment of accuracy, time, and patient acceptance" 146 : 673-682, 2014

      34 Favaretto M, "Big Data and Digitalization in Dentistry : A Systematic Review of the Ethical Issues" 17 : 2495-, 2020

      35 Rheude B, "An evaluation of the use of digital study models in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning" 75 : 300-304, 2005

      36 Camardella LT, "Accuracy and reproducibility of measurements on plaster models and digital models created using an intraoral scanner" 78 : 211-220, 2017

      37 Sousa MV, "Accuracy and reproducibility of 3-dimensional digital model measurements" 142 : 269-273, 2012

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2017-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.39 0.39 0.37
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.36 0.35 0.399 0.05
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼