Ambiguity Advantage or Disadvantage? Lexical Access to Second Language Homonymy

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Recent first language (L1) psycholinguistic research (e.g., Rodd et al. 2002) has challenged a robust finding known as ambiguity advantage effect, in which words having multiple meanings are accessed faster than counterparts having a single meaning. This paper investigates whether second language (L2) learners shows the ambiguity advantage effect when comparing words having multiple meanings and few senses (e.g., bat) with words that have a single meaning and few senses (e.g., boy). In a visual lexical decision task, an L1 group and an L2 group showed opposite patterns in processing semantically ambiguous words. The L1 group processed ambiguous words slower than unambiguous words (i.e., ambiguity disadvantage effect) whereas the L2 group accessed ambiguous words faster than unambiguous words (i.e., ambiguity advantage effect). The findings are discussed in relation to the possible differences in the architecture of the L1 and the L2 mental lexicons.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 1. Introduction
• 2. Ambiguity Advantage or Disadvantage
• 3. The Study
• 4. Discussion and Conclusion

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Besner, Derek, "Wrestling with ambiguity —Further reflections: Reply to Masson and Borowsky" 21 : 515-519, 1995

2 Parks, Bob, "Wordsmyth English dictionary-thesaurus" University of Chicago 1998

3 Azuma, Tamiko, "Why SAFE is better than FAST: The relatedness of a word’s meanings affects lexical decision times" 36 : 484-504, 1997

4 Kawamoto, Alan, "When two meanings are better than one: Modelling the ambiguity advantage using a recurrent distributed network" 20 : 1233-1247, 1994

5 Twilley, Leslie, "University of Alberta norms of relative meaning frequency for 566 homographs" 22 : 111-126, 1994

6 Piercey, Darren, "Turning an advantage into a disadvantage: Ambiguity effects in lexical decision versus reading tasks" 28 : 657-666, 2000

7 Klepousniotou,Ekaterini, "The processing of lexical ambiguity: Homonymy and polysemy in the mental lexicon" 81 : 205-223, 2002

8 Beretta, Alan, "The effects of homonymy and ploysemy on lexical access: An MEG study" 24 : 57-65, 2005

9 Millis, Michelle, "The effect of polysemy on lexical decision time: Now you see it, now you don’t" 17 : 141-147, 1989

10 Baayen, Harald, "The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM)" University of Pennsylvania 1995

11 Forster, Kenneth, "Terminating and exhaustive search in lexical access" 4 : 53-61, 1976

12 Lyons,John, "Semantics" Cambridge University Press 1977

13 Palmer, Frank, "Semantics" Cambridge University Press 1981

14 Borowsky, Ron, "Semantic ambiguity effects in word identification" 22 : 63-85, 1996

15 Field,John, "Psycholinguistics: The Key Concepts" Routledge 2004

16 Jastrzembski, James, "Multiple word meanings and lexical search speed" 14 : 534-537, 1975

17 Jastrzembski,James, "Multiple meanings, number of related meanings, frequency of occurrence, and the lexicon" 13 : 278-305, 1981

18 Rodd, Jennifer, "Modelling the effects of semantic ambiguity in word recognition" 28 : 89-104, 2004

19 Rodd, Jennifer, "Making sense of semantic ambiguity: Semantic competition in lexical access" 46 : 245-266, 2002

20 Cruse,David, "Lexical semantics" Cambridge University Press 1986

21 Kellas, George, "Lexical ambiguity and the time-course of attentional allocation in word recognition" 14 : 601-609, 1988

22 Rubenstein, Herbert, "Homographic entries in the internal lexicon" 9 : 487-494, 1970

23 Hino, Yasushi, "Effects of polysemy in lexical decision and naming: An alternative to lexical access accounts" 22 : 1331-1356, 1996

24 Hino, Yasushi, "Ambiguity and relatedness effects in semantic tasks: Are they due to semantic coding?" 55 : 247-273, 2006