이광수와 나쓰메 소세키의 문학교육론이 지닌 근대성 비교연구 = Comparative study : retained modernity in theory of literary education for Natsume Soseki and Lee Gwangsoo

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Soseki is representative novelist and theorists of Japanese modern literature, and Lee Gwangsoo (Lee) is known as person who opened doors to Korean modern literature. They are representing not only Korean and Japanese modern literature, but also Oriental modern literature. We focused on the early stages of their literary theories. As well, looked into their arguments based on their ideas of literary education in relation between literature and society.
Although Soseki and Lee are both representatives of Korean and Japanese modern literature, we have found their literary theories to have contrasts, as well as undertoned ideal substance. Their findings show identical recognition in defining the workings of human mind as intellect, emotion and volition. Also, their thoughts on the realm of emotion is the characteristic of literature, and explained modern literature by drawing the concepts of rationality and truth.
Soseki insisted literary art is not a simple skill; a literary artist could influence others due to their ideals that a literary artist is someone who has the biggest and highest ideals. Lee’s argument resembles Soseki’s argument. Lee contended literary art can be made simply with skill and endeavor. Only highly gifted artist can take charge of a growing self-regulating person who could lead society through literature.
Soseki and Lee both, therefore, conclude the Occidental natural science (in other words, education that is logical and substantiate) is modern education, and upcoming Oriental new education need to take after. We found Soseki and Lee have contended education through literature that could produce self-regulating and liberal individuals based on the mentioned Occidental new education.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 1. 한 · 일 두 근대 지식인의 문학과의 조우
• 2. 선행연구
• 3. 『문학론』과 「문학이란 하오?」 비교
• 4. 문학교육과 근대
• 참고문헌
• 【논문초록】

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 정병호, "한일근대문예론에 있어서"정"(情)의 위치-지(知)․정(情)․의(意)의 범주를 중심으로-" 경원대학교아시아문화연구소 8 : 294-, 2004

2 하정일, "자율적 개인과 부르조아 결사로서의 민족, In 이광수 문학의 재인식" 소명출판 15-150, 2009

3 가라타니 고진, "일본 근대문학의 기원" 민음사 19-23, 1997

4 이광수, "문학이란 하오, In 이광수 전집 1" 삼중당 507-509, 1968

5 崔明淑, "나쓰메 소세키와 영문학강의 -『문학론』을 중심으로-" 한국일어일문학회 57 (57): 124-149, 2006

6 권혁건, "나쓰메 소세키(夏目漱石)와 이광수(李光洙)의 유학체험 비교연구" 동북아시아문화학회 1 (1): 47-65, 2008

7 권혁건, "나쓰메 소세키 생애와 작품" 고려대학교 출판부 18-, 2007

8 夏目金之助, "現代日本の開化" 岩波書店 16 : 440-, 2003

9 夏目金之助, "文學論 序, 漱石全集 第14卷" 岩波書店 10-, 2003

10 三好行雄, "敎育と文藝, In 漱石文明論集" 岩波書店 191-201, 1999

11 三好行雄, "夏目漱石事典" 學燈社 68-, 1990

12 夏目金之助, "創作家の態度" 岩波書店 16 : 85-173, 2003

13 이광수, "今日 我韓靑年과 情育, In 이광수 전집 1" 삼중당 475-, 1968