미필적 고의에 관한 약간의 고찰

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In this article the author tries to find an element in dolus eventualis case that makes it a crime with criminal intent, not of negligence. For that purpose he analyzes mens rea, the subjective element of crime, and tries to compare the theories of dolus available in korean criminal law scholarship. Korean criminal law does not have any category similar to ‘recklessness’ in anglo-american law, so the cases subsumed by that category should be classified as either crime with intent or negligence. The author insists after some theoretical investigation on the themes around the criminal intent that the essential element in the dolus eventualis cases the criminal’s attitude of taking result seriouly during committing a crime. So if a criminal took the result seriouly, which at last occurred after her performing some activity, the result can be regarded as committed with criminal intent.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 신동운, "형법총론 제8판" 법문사 2014

2 이재상, "형법총론 제7판" 박영사 2012

3 임웅, "형법총론 제4정판" 법문사 2012

4 김성돈, "형법총론 제3판" 성균관대학교 출판부 2014

5 배종대, "형법총론 제11판" 홍문사 2014

6 정성근, "형법총론" 성균관대학교 출판부 2012

7 이재상, "형법연습 제8판" 신조사 2012

8 정영일, "형법강의[총론]" 도서출판 학림 121-, 2013

9 김용욱, "미필적 고의와 과실의 구분에 관한 연구" 3 (3): 2001

10 문채규, "미필적 고의" 11 : 1989

11 Weigend, Thomas, "Zwischen Vorsatz und Fahrlässigkeit"

12 Frank, Reinhard, "Vorstellung und Wille in der modernen Doluslehre, ZStW Bd. 10" 1890

13 Frisch, Wolfgang, "Vorsatz und Risiko" 1983

14 Engisch, Karl, "Untersuchungen über Vorsatz und Fahrlässigkeit" 1930

15 Maurach-Zipf, "Strafrecht Allgemeiner Teil, Teilband 1, 8판" 1992

16 Baumann-Weber-Mitsch, "Strafrecht Allgemeiner Teil, 10판" 1995

17 Stratenwerth, "Strafrecht Allgemeiner Teil I, 4판" 2000

18 Tröndle-Fischer, "Strafgesetzbuch, 49판" 1999

19 von Hippel, Robert, "Die Grenze von Vorsatz und Fahrlässigkeit" 1903

20 Wolff, Ernst Amadeus, "Die Grenze des dolus eventualis und der willentlichen Verletzung" Gallas-Festschrift 1973

21 Kaufmann, Armin, "Der dolus eventualis im Deliktsaufbar, Strafrechtdogmatik zwischen Sein und Wert"

22 Kindhäuser, Urs, "Der Vorsatz als Zurechnungskriterium" 96 : 1984

23 Mayer, Max Ernst, "Der Allgemeiner Teil des deustchen Strafrechts. Lehrbuch" 1923

24 Henrich, Dieter, "Between Kant and Hegel" 2003

25 Schröder, Horst, "Aufbau und Grenzen des Vorsatzbegriffs" Sauer-Festschrift 1949