RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      Outcomes of Cephalomedullary Nailing in Basicervical Fracture

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104303126

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Purpose: A basicervical femoral fracture is defined as a fracture of base of neck of femur that occurs medially from intertrochanteric line above lesser trochanter. In this study, we intended to evaluate radiological and clinical results of basicervic...

      Purpose: A basicervical femoral fracture is defined as a fracture of base of neck of femur that occurs medially from intertrochanteric line above lesser trochanter. In this study, we intended to evaluate radiological and clinical results of basicervical femoral fractures treated by intramedullary nailing.
      Materials and Methods: Fifteen patients, who underwent intramedullary nailing among 50 patients, out of 50 who were diagnosed with basicervical femoral fractures from July 2012 to May 2015 were studied. All of 15 patients’ fracture were two-part basicervical fractures. Using radiography, we characterized the: i) state of reduction, ii) location of the lag screw, iii) tip apex distance (TAD), and iv) sliding distance of lag screw and bone union. Additionally, we performed clinical assessment before injury and at final follow-up.
      Results: In radiological assessment, we achieved acceptable reduction state in all patients. All lag screws were fixated on appropriate locations. Mean TAD was 17.3 mm (11.0-21.1 mm), which showed insertion point of <25 mm in all cases. The mean sliding distance of the lag screw was 5.1 mm (0.1-16.0 mm) at the final follow-up. The mean bone union period was 4.8 months (3-10 months) with achieving in all cases. In clinical assessment, Harris hip score, visual analogue scale score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index score, all of them significantly improved postoperatively compared with preoperative scores (P<0.05).
      Conclusion: In elderly patients with basicervical femoral fractures, treatment with intramedullary nailing showed satisfactory results, considered to be a useful method if performed with skilled technique.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 윤의성, "고령의 불안정성 대퇴골 전자간 골절에서의 일차적 양극성 반 인공관절 치환술과 압박고 나사의 비교" 대한골절학회 17 (17): 214-220, 2004

      2 Baumgaertner MR, "The value of the tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip" 77 : 1058-1064, 1995

      3 Dossick PH, "Techniques for preoperative planning and postoperative evaluation of noncemented hip arthroplasty" 6 (6): 1-6, 1991

      4 Hu SJ, "Surgical treatment of basicervical intertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur with cephalomeduallary hip nails" 5 : 124-129, 2013

      5 Tasyikan L, "Short-term results of surgical treatment with cephalomedullary nails for basicervical proximal femoral fractures" 81 : 427-434, 2015

      6 Watson ST, "Outcomes of low-energy basicervical proximal femoral fractures treated with cephalomedullary fixation" 98 : 1097-1102, 2016

      7 Ly TV, "Management of femoral neck fractures in young adults" 42 : 3-12, 2008

      8 Skála-Rosenbaum J, "Is distal locking with IMHN necessary in every pertrochanteric fracture?" 34 : 1041-1047, 2010

      9 Fogagnolo F, "Intramedullary fixation of pertrochanteric hip fractures with the short AOASIF proximal femoral nail" 124 : 31-37, 2004

      10 Parker MJ, "Handbook of hip fracture surgery" Butterworth-Heinemann 63-90, 1997

      1 윤의성, "고령의 불안정성 대퇴골 전자간 골절에서의 일차적 양극성 반 인공관절 치환술과 압박고 나사의 비교" 대한골절학회 17 (17): 214-220, 2004

      2 Baumgaertner MR, "The value of the tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip" 77 : 1058-1064, 1995

      3 Dossick PH, "Techniques for preoperative planning and postoperative evaluation of noncemented hip arthroplasty" 6 (6): 1-6, 1991

      4 Hu SJ, "Surgical treatment of basicervical intertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur with cephalomeduallary hip nails" 5 : 124-129, 2013

      5 Tasyikan L, "Short-term results of surgical treatment with cephalomedullary nails for basicervical proximal femoral fractures" 81 : 427-434, 2015

      6 Watson ST, "Outcomes of low-energy basicervical proximal femoral fractures treated with cephalomedullary fixation" 98 : 1097-1102, 2016

      7 Ly TV, "Management of femoral neck fractures in young adults" 42 : 3-12, 2008

      8 Skála-Rosenbaum J, "Is distal locking with IMHN necessary in every pertrochanteric fracture?" 34 : 1041-1047, 2010

      9 Fogagnolo F, "Intramedullary fixation of pertrochanteric hip fractures with the short AOASIF proximal femoral nail" 124 : 31-37, 2004

      10 Parker MJ, "Handbook of hip fracture surgery" Butterworth-Heinemann 63-90, 1997

      11 Parker MJ, "Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults" (3) : CD000093-, 2008

      12 Koval KJ, "Functional recovery after fracture of the hip" 76 : 751-758, 1994

      13 Kim KW, "Elderly trochanteric fractures: principles of treatment" 7 : 227-234, 1994

      14 Deneka DA, "Biomechanical comparison of internal fixation techniques for the treatment of unstable basicervical femoral neck fractures" 11 : 337-343, 1997

      15 Gill JM, "Biomechanical aspects of the repair of intertrochanteric fractures" 11 : 235-239, 1989

      16 Su BW, "Basicervical versus intertrochanteric fractures: an analysis of radiographic and functional outcomes" 29 : 919-925, 2006

      17 Blair B, "Basicervical fractures of the proximal femur. A biomechanical study of 3 internal fixation techniques" (306) : 256-263, 1994

      18 Saarenpää I, "Basicervical fracture--a rare type of hip fracture" 122 : 69-72, 2002

      19 Jones HW, "Are short femoral nails superior to the sliding hip screw? A meta-analysis of 24studies involving 3,279 fractures" 30 : 69-78, 2006

      20 Koval KJ, "Ambulatory ability after hip fracture. A prospective study in geriatric patients" (310) : 150-159, 1995

      21 Lieberman JR, "AAOS comprehensive orthopaedic review" American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 597-598, 2009

      22 Cleveland M, "A ten-year analysis of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur" 41-A : 1399-1408, 1959

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2025 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2022-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2012-06-29 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한고관절학회지 -> Hip and Pelvis
      외국어명 : The Journal of Korean Hip Society -> Hip and Pelvis
      KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.04 0.04 0.04
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.05 0.05 0.168 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼