RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      조선총독부의 조선인 도지사 임용정책과 양상 = The Joseon Governor General office`s appointment policy of the Korean provincial governors.

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103127806

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The highest ranking position that a Joseon individual could reach under the ruling of the Joseon Governor General office, was the seat of a provincial governor. How the appointment policy of the governor general office, and the reality involved in suc...

      The highest ranking position that a Joseon individual could reach under the ruling of the Joseon Governor General office, was the seat of a provincial governor. How the appointment policy of the governor general office, and the reality involved in such appointments, would have changed over the years? The Joseon individuals who reached the level of a governor always received attention, so it would be important to examine their career, their background, and what kind of routes they took to become a provincial governor. In this article, such examinations are made. And by doing so, we could examine the appointment process for the Joseon official and also the flow of such policy`s implementation, while also examining the changing nature of the colonial policies in general. Only a few high ranking Joseon officials reached the level of a governor. In order to become a provincial governor one surely had to have professional expertise as an administrative official, but the Koreans at the time also had to have something else. They would have to have a background based upon either a private or official relationship with the leadership of the Governor General office, who would have been in charge of making personnel appointments. The average serving period of a Joseon provincial governor was roughly 2 years and 4 months, and the average figure for an individual`s stay in office was 4 years. One would usually end up serving as a governor in two regions, once been appointed to a provincial governor for the first time. The Joseon people who were appointed as provincial governors in the 1910s were selected because they all had the background of serving as members of the `Pro-Japanese` party. In many cases they lacked the capability or professional expertise as a modern-day administrative official, yet the Governor General office let them retain their jobs, in return for their service to the Japanese colonial leadership. Yet passing the early 1920s, they began to be replaced by more capable and more professional individuals, and such trend was finalized in the late 1920s and the 1930s. Since then, only the Joseon people equipped with necessary experience and administrative skills were appointed as provincial governors, and they showed several groups inside them, like people who started from the bottom line of the administrative chain of command, and people who were deemed `qualified` by graduating from prominent schools or passing the supreme literary official test. The ratio of such figures actually grown in following periods, and it shows that the Japanese leadership was changing its policy, and was requiring the possession of general capability from the Joseon candidates for provincial governor seats, instead of only recognizing special circumstances, in the 1930s. The average age when the Joseon people were appointed as provincial governors, was around 50. It should be noted that many of them had earli er studied in Japan, or studied in Japanese language schools opened in Jos eon. Such background would have surely helped them accumulate contacts with the Japanese, and establish relationships with them as well. And later they went through promotions, to eventually become provincial governors. The people who were appointed before the 1920s generally went through a course of `magistrate → participatory observer → rovincial governor,` whi le the people who were appointed after the 1930s typically went through a course of `Gun or Do secretary → magistrate → provincial commissioner → Do administrative officer / participatory observer → provincial governo r.` In the meantime, some of the appointees were graduates from the Japa nese Imperial university or passers of the supreme literary official test, who also happened to serve as administrative officers inside the Governor Gener al office headquarters. Although there were no legal dictation, 5 out of 13 provincial governor seats were almost always alloted to the Joseon people. It was essentially a quota for the Koreans. And those five seats were of provinces that posed no significance power or influence, or provinces that displayed lesser importance in geo-political terms. On the contrary, other important provinces including the head province Gyeonggi-do and other regions near the border, were governed by Japanese governors. We can see that, while the Joseon provincial governors were essentially `chosen ones` selected by the Joseon Governor General office, even them as well were being discriminated to a certain extent by the Japanese oppressors.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 국사편찬위원회, "한국사데이터베이스"

      2 반민족문제연구소, "친일파 99인" 돌베개 1993

      3 안용식, "조선총독부하 일본인관료 연구" 국학연구원 (137) : 151-229, 2007

      4 동선희, "조선총독부 통치구조 하에서의 道및 道知事의 기능과 역할" 친일반민족행위진상규명위원회 2007

      5 박은경, "일제하 조선인 관료 연구" 학민사 1999

      6 光化門生, "韓相龍과 同友俱樂部, 그들의 正軆는 무엇?" 1931

      7 "韓國陸軍騎兵參領勳五等朴榮喆外二十七名敍勳及賜ノ件"

      8 손정목, "韓國地方制度·自治史硏究(上)" 일지사 1992

      9 綠眼鏡, "門牌秘密調査錄" 1932

      10 北岳山人, "總督府朝鮮人高等官評" 1940

      1 국사편찬위원회, "한국사데이터베이스"

      2 반민족문제연구소, "친일파 99인" 돌베개 1993

      3 안용식, "조선총독부하 일본인관료 연구" 국학연구원 (137) : 151-229, 2007

      4 동선희, "조선총독부 통치구조 하에서의 道및 道知事의 기능과 역할" 친일반민족행위진상규명위원회 2007

      5 박은경, "일제하 조선인 관료 연구" 학민사 1999

      6 光化門生, "韓相龍과 同友俱樂部, 그들의 正軆는 무엇?" 1931

      7 "韓國陸軍騎兵參領勳五等朴榮喆外二十七名敍勳及賜ノ件"

      8 손정목, "韓國地方制度·自治史硏究(上)" 일지사 1992

      9 綠眼鏡, "門牌秘密調査錄" 1932

      10 北岳山人, "總督府朝鮮人高等官評" 1940

      11 野崎眞三, "知事の首を洗ふ(一)" 339 : 35-, 1936

      12 野崎眞三, "知事の首を洗ふ(二)" 340 : 31-, 1936

      13 朴榮喆, "歷代總督의 人物, 내가 본 伊藤·曾根·寺內·長谷川·齋藤·山梨·宇垣의 7代總督記" 1934

      14 岡本眞希子, "植民地官僚の政治史―朝鮮·臺灣總督府と帝國日本" 三元社 2008

      15 "未公開資料朝鮮總督府關係者錄音記錄(3)―朝鮮總督府·組織と人" 學習院大學東洋文化硏究所 4 : 2002

      16 이준식, "朝鮮總督府內務官僚富永文一의 鄕約硏究와 鄕約普及運\動-關北鄕約을 중심으로, In 日本の朝鮮·臺灣支配と植民地官僚" 國際日本文化硏究センター 2007

      17 "朝鮮官海の異動短評" 206 : 191-, 1925

      18 一記者, "朝鮮各道の現狀" 165 : 1921

      19 光化學人, "朝鮮人道知事人物評(二)" 1940

      20 心耕生, "朝鮮人道知事人物觀" 1933

      21 三千里社主幹金東煥, "時評-權門勢家들의 反省을 促함" 1938

      22 八木信雄, "日本과 韓國" 日韓文化協會 152-, 1978

      23 松田利彦, "日本の朝鮮·台湾支配と植民地官僚" 思文閣出版 2009

      24 강동진, "日帝의 韓國侵略政策史" 한길사 1980

      25 光化學人, "新知事人物評(一), 忠北知事兪萬兼論" 1936

      26 "張憲植民政視察事務官總督府登廳"

      27 日本公務員制度史硏究會, "官吏·公務員制度の変遷" 第一法規出版株式會社 1990

      28 "國務院總務廳編纂"

      29 須麻守人, "十三道知事論" 374 : 46-49, 1939

      30 一記者, "十三道知事訪問記" 159 : 1920

      31 北岳山人, "十三道知事人物評, 忠北知事金東勳君" 1937

      32 松花學人, "十三知道事人物評―江原道知事金時權論" 1938

      33 "公文雑纂·昭和十八年·第十五巻·内閣十五"

      34 有馬易水, "人物評論―眞物歟贋物歟" 朝鮮公論社 173-182, 1917

      35 松山浪客, "人物評, 今次의 總督府及各道高官異動評" 1940

      36 "京城雜話" 開闢社 1924

      37 朝鮮總督府, "中樞院ノ沿革調査" 국사편찬위원회

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.12 1.12 1.12
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.04 1.06 1.812 0.43
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼