RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      DSM-Ⅳ 성격장애와 성격 5요인 간의 관계 = The Relationships between DSM-IV Personality Disorders and the Five Factors of Personality

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104696598

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The purpose of this study is to investigate whether the factors from the Five-Factor Model of Personality can be applied to a categorical model of personality disorders. Three hundred ninety subjects, who were over 19 years of age, participated in col...

      The purpose of this study is to investigate whether the factors from the Five-Factor Model of Personality can be applied to a categorical model of personality disorders. Three hundred ninety subjects, who were over 19 years of age, participated in collecting the data. The five factors (neuroticism, extroversions, openness to experience, agreeableness, conscientiousness) of personality showed significantly correlations with the scores of the ten DSM-Ⅳpersonality disorders. On the results of multiple regression analysis, the five factors of personality significantly predicted the DSM-IV personality disorders. The Paranoid, Schizotypal, Borderline, Avoidant, and Dependant PDs were positively predicted by ‘neuroticism’. The Paranoid, Schizoid, Avoidant, and Obsessive-Compulsive PDs were negatively predicted and the Borderline PD was positively predicted by ‘extroversion’. The Schizotypal, Borderline, and Narcissistic PDs were positively predicted by ‘openness to experience’. The Paranoid, Schizotypal, Antisocial, Borderline, Histrionic, and Narcissistic PDs were negatively predicted by ‘agreeableness’. The Paranoid and Obsessive-Compulsive PDs were positively predicted and the Histrionic and Narcissistic PDs were negatively predicted by ‘conscientiousness’. These results suggest that personality disorders can be represented by the Five-Factor Model of Personality.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 서재삼, "한국형 성격장애 진단검사의 개발과 타당화" 한국임상심리학회 25 (25): 273-288, 2006

      2 황순택, "전형성 평정에 의한 성격장애 진단준거 개발" 연세대 대학원 1995

      3 Lynam, D. R., "Using the Five-Factor Model to represent the DSM-IV personality disorders: An expert consensus approach" 110 : 401-412, 2001

      4 Blais, M. A., "Toward an emprical/theoretical grouping of the DSM-III-R personality disorders" 11 : 191-198, 1997

      5 Widiger, T. A., "Toward a dimensional model for the personality disorders in Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality" American Psychiatric Associa 19-39, 1994

      6 Goldberg, L. R., "The structure of phenotypic personality traits" 48 : 26-34, 1993

      7 Saulsman, L. M., "The five-factor model and personality disorder. empirical literature: a meta-analytic review" 23 : 1055-1085, 2004

      8 Blashfield, R. K., "The classification of psychopathology" Plenum 1984

      9 Lehne, G. K., "The NEO-PI and the MCMI in the forensic evaluation of sex offenders in Personality Disorders and the Five-Factor Model of Personality" American Psychological Association 1994

      10 Widiger, T. A., "The DSM-III-R Categorical Personality Disorder Diagnoses: A Critique and a Alternative" 4 : 75-90, 1993

      1 서재삼, "한국형 성격장애 진단검사의 개발과 타당화" 한국임상심리학회 25 (25): 273-288, 2006

      2 황순택, "전형성 평정에 의한 성격장애 진단준거 개발" 연세대 대학원 1995

      3 Lynam, D. R., "Using the Five-Factor Model to represent the DSM-IV personality disorders: An expert consensus approach" 110 : 401-412, 2001

      4 Blais, M. A., "Toward an emprical/theoretical grouping of the DSM-III-R personality disorders" 11 : 191-198, 1997

      5 Widiger, T. A., "Toward a dimensional model for the personality disorders in Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality" American Psychiatric Associa 19-39, 1994

      6 Goldberg, L. R., "The structure of phenotypic personality traits" 48 : 26-34, 1993

      7 Saulsman, L. M., "The five-factor model and personality disorder. empirical literature: a meta-analytic review" 23 : 1055-1085, 2004

      8 Blashfield, R. K., "The classification of psychopathology" Plenum 1984

      9 Lehne, G. K., "The NEO-PI and the MCMI in the forensic evaluation of sex offenders in Personality Disorders and the Five-Factor Model of Personality" American Psychological Association 1994

      10 Widiger, T. A., "The DSM-III-R Categorical Personality Disorder Diagnoses: A Critique and a Alternative" 4 : 75-90, 1993

      11 Dyce, J. A., "The Big Five factors of personality and their relationship to personality disorders" 53 : 587-593, 1997

      12 Trull, T. J., "Structured interview for the five-factor model of personality" Psychological Assesment Resources 1997

      13 Soldz, S., "Representation of personality disorder in circumplex and five factor space L Exploration with a clinical sample" 5 : 41-52, 1993

      14 Hyer, L., "Relationship of NEO-PI to personality styles and severity of trauma in chronic PTSD victims" 50 : 699-707, 1994

      15 Tyrer, P., "Problems in the classi-. fication of personality disorder" 17 : 15-20, 1987

      16 Digman, J. M., "Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model" 41 : 417-440, 1990

      17 Costa, P. T. Jr., "Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality" 4 : 362-371, 1990

      18 Dyce, J. A., "Personality disorders and the five-. factor model: A test of facet-level predictions" 12 : 31-45, 1998

      19 Yang, J., "Personality disorders and the Five-Factor Model of personality in Chinese psychiatric patients in Personality disorders and t"

      20 Widiger, T. A., "Personality disorder dimensional models proposed for DSM-IV" 5 : 386-398, 1991

      21 Coolidge, F. L., "On the relationship of the five-factor personality model to personality disorders: Four reservations" 75 : 11-21, 1994

      22 안창규, "NEO-PI-R의 한국표준화를 위한 연구" 9 : 443-473, 1997

      23 민병모, "NEO 인성검사" PSI 컨설팅 1997

      24 Goldberg, L. R., "Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons" 2 : 141-165, 1981

      25 Widiger, T. A., "Five-factor model assessment of. personality disorder" 89 : 16-29, 2007

      26 Widiger, A. T., "Five factor model of personality disorder: Integrating science and practice" 39 : 67-83, 2005

      27 Costa, P. T. Jr., "Facet scales for agreeableness and conscientiousness: A revision of the NEO Personality Inventory" 12 : 887-898, 1991

      28 Haigler, E. D., "Experimental manipulation of NEO PI-R items" 77 : 339-358, 2001

      29 Morey, L. C., "Dimensions and categories: The “big five” factors and the DSM personality disorders" 7 : 203-216, 2000

      30 American Psychiatric Association, "Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders" 1994

      31 American Psychiatric Association, "Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders" 1980

      32 Widiger, T. A., "Diagnostic Categories or Dimensions? A Question for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fifth Edition" 114 : 494-504, 2005

      33 Bagby, R. M., "DSM-IV Personality Disorders and the Five-Factor Model of Personality: A Multi-Method Examination of Domain- and Facet-Level Predictions" European Journal of Personalit 2005

      34 Trull, T. J., "DSM-III-R Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality: an empirical comparison" 101 : 553-560, 1992

      35 Oldham, J. M., "DSM-III personality disorders: Assessment problems" 1 : 241-247, 1987

      36 Widiger, T. A., "Clinician's Judgments of Clinical Utility: A Comparison of the DSM-IV and Five-Factor Models" 115 : 298-308, 2005

      37 Blais, M. A., "Clinical ratings of the five-factor model of personality and the DSM-IV personality disorders" 185 : 388-393, 1997

      38 Millon, T., "Classification in psychopathology: Rationale, alternatives, and standards" 100 : 245-261, 1991

      39 Frances, A. J., "Categorical and dimensional systems of personality diagnosis: A comparison" 23 : 506-526, 1982

      40 Eysenck, H., "A critique of contemporary classification and diagnosis in Contemporary directions in psychopathology: Toward the DSM-IV" Guilford Press 73-98, 1986

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-03-22 학술지명변경 한글명 : 한국심리학회지 임상 -> Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology KCI등재
      2016-02-16 학술지명변경 외국어명 : The Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology -> Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology KCI등재
      2014-04-10 학회명변경 영문명 : The Korean Society Of Clinical Psychology -> Korean Clinical Psychology Association KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-27 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국심리학회 산하 임상심리학회 -> 한국임상심리학회 KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2001-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1998-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.36 1.36 1.6
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.69 1.77 2.966 0.3
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼