RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      청소년을 대상으로 한 게슈탈트 집단상담 프로그램 효과에 대한 메타분석 = The meta-analysis on the effect of Gestalt group counseling program for adolescents

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T14744686

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the gestalt group counseling program for adolescents in Korea by utilizing meta-analysis methods. A total of 73 studies from 1985 to 2016 were selected and analyzed. The mean effect sizes ...

      The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the gestalt group counseling program for adolescents in Korea by utilizing meta-analysis methods. A total of 73 studies from 1985 to 2016 were selected and analyzed. The mean effect sizes and test for homogeneity of effect size were analyzed by using The R Project for Statistical Computing 3.4.0 version. The Random-effects model was adopted and 168 effect sizes were calculated. The following analysis results were observed.
      First, the overall mean effect size of the program was found to be 0.942. The effect size is considered as a large mean effect size according to the criteria which Cohen (1988) established.
      Second, among dependent variables, Self-concept was found to be the most effective variable (1.066) in regard to the effect size. Emotion (1.015), school life adaptation (0.874) and interpersonal relation (0.679) all showed mean effect size, implying that the gestalt group counseling program for adolescents was effective in all mentioned fields.
      Third, a slight decrease was observed in the relations between the publication year of the subject for analysis and the effect size (-0.0228). The mean effect size differed between the sample groups according to the other moderating variables examined (school level of subject, spontaneity, subject specialty, gender and group size respectively). High school students showed the highest mean size for the school level of subjects (1.648) while the spontaneous group displayed the highest mean size for spontaneity (1.141). The highest mean sizes in subject specialty, gender and group size were observed in the general group (1.185), mixed general group (1.094) and groups with between 7 and 10 members (1.173) respectively. When the sessions were conducted more than 11 times, the mean effect was seen to be at its highest (1.361). Other groups representing highest mean effect sizes were more than 3 sessions per week (1.152), between 51 to 90 minutes per session (1.059) and over 9 weeks of conducting period (1.319). Moreover, the mean effect size was observed to be highest in cases where the experience report was filled in. Among the different gestalt group counseling program combinations, the mean effect sizes were seen to be different depending on the combinations of programs used. Utilizing the gestalt program combined with other counseling theories gave a mean effect size of 1.331, while combination with the empty chair or self-awareness centered program, integrated art therapy orientated program and GRIP program gave mean effect sizes of 1.202, 0.89 and 0.601 respectively. These combinations represented more than the average effectiveness of the mean effect size. In addition, there were no statistically significant differences observed based on the group size, number of sessions per week, duration of each session and experience reported.
      Based on these outcomes, the findings of this study can be used to support the planning of interventions providing gestalt group counseling to adolescents. Moreover they can provide implications in the continued development and implementation of gestalt group counseling programs focusing on adolescents.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • I. 서론 1
      • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 1
      • 2. 연구문제 8
      • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 9
      • 1. 청소년 9
      • I. 서론 1
      • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 1
      • 2. 연구문제 8
      • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 9
      • 1. 청소년 9
      • 2. 게슈탈트 집단상담 프로그램 19
      • 3. 게슈탈트 집단상담 프로그램 종속변인 26
      • 4. 게슈탈트 집단상담 프로그램 조절변인 41
      • 5. 게슈탈트 집단상담 프로그램 메타분석 선행연구 47
      • Ⅲ. 연구 방법 49
      • 1. 연구모형 49
      • 2. 분석대상 논문의 선정 50
      • 3. 분석 대상 연구의 특성 54
      • 4. 자료의 분석 방법 68
      • 5. 자료 처리 및 분석 77
      • Ⅳ. 연구 결과 79
      • 1. 청소년 대상 게슈탈트 집단상담 프로그램의 전체 평균효과크기 79
      • 2. 종속변인에 따른 평균효과크기 80
      • 3. 조절변인에 따른 평균효과크기 81
      • 4. 데이터 오류 검증 95
      • Ⅴ. 논의 99
      • Ⅵ. 결론 및 제언 115
      • 1. 결론 115
      • 2. 제언 117
      • 참고문헌 119
      • Abstract 134
      • 부록 1. 코딩양식 136
      • 부록 2. 코딩 매뉴얼 137
      • 부록 3. 메타분석 대상 논문 139
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼