기준공정과 개선대상공정 간의 투입물(Input, Material and energy), 배출물(Output, Product, Co-product), 환경오염물 (Environmental emission) 데이터를 수집하고 공정 성과를 분석하였다. 이를 통해 환경적으로...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103378819
2017
Korean
KCI등재
학술저널
449-455(7쪽)
0
0
상세조회0
다운로드국문 초록 (Abstract)
기준공정과 개선대상공정 간의 투입물(Input, Material and energy), 배출물(Output, Product, Co-product), 환경오염물 (Environmental emission) 데이터를 수집하고 공정 성과를 분석하였다. 이를 통해 환경적으로...
기준공정과 개선대상공정 간의 투입물(Input, Material and energy), 배출물(Output, Product, Co-product), 환경오염물 (Environmental emission) 데이터를 수집하고 공정 성과를 분석하였다. 이를 통해 환경적으로 주요한 투입물과 환경오염물을 파악하였다. 제조공정의 투입물과 환경오염물 간의 상관관계 분석을 통해 각 환경오염물에 대한 기여도가 큰 투입물을 파악하였다. 주요 환경오염물 처리 시, 경제적 최적화를 통한 종말처리공정 조합을 선형 프로그래밍 기법을 사용하여 규명하였다. 사례 연구로는 동일한 형태의 시멘트를 생산하는 EU와 국내 시멘트 제조공정을 선정하였다. 국내 시멘트 제조공정에서는 석탄이 주요 투입물로, 먼지, SOx가 주요 환경오염물로 파악되었다. 제조공정의 투입물과 환경오염물 간의 다중회귀분석결과 석탄〉원자재〉석고 순으로 CO₂발생량에 기여도가 큰 것으로 나타났다. SOx발생량의 경우 석탄의 기여도가 가장 컸으며, Dust 발생량의 경우 석고〉원자재 순으로 기여도가 큰 것으로 나타났다. Dust 종말처리공정 최적화에서 전기집진기술 100%, 섬유필터기술 2.4% 조합이 최적이었다. SOx종말처리공정 최적화에서는 건식첨가공정기술 100% 습식세정기술 25.88% 조합이 최적이었다. 이 연구의 특징은 제조공정에서 문제가 되는 주요 투입물과 환경오염물을 파악하는 방법을 제시하였다는 점이다. 또한, 기술적·경제적으로 최적의 조합인 종말처리공정 선정 방법을 제시하였다는 점이다.
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
Process input data including material and energy, process output data including product, co-product and its environmental emissions of the reference and target processes were collected and analyzed to evaluate the process performance. Environmentally ...
Process input data including material and energy, process output data including product, co-product and its environmental emissions of the reference and target processes were collected and analyzed to evaluate the process performance. Environmentally problematic input/environmental emissions of the manufacturing processes were identified using these data. Significant process inputs contributing to each of the environmental emissions were identified using multiple regression analysis between the process inputs and environmental emissions. Optimum combination of the end-of-pipe technologies for treating the environmental emissions considering economic aspects was made using the linear programming technique. The cement manufacturing processes in Korea and the EU producing same type of cement were chosen for the case study. Environmentally problematic input/environmental emissions of the domestic cement manufacturing processes include coal, dust, and SOx. Multiple regression analysis among the process inputs and environmental emissions revealed that CO₂ emission was influenced most by coal, followed by the input raw materials and gypsum. SOx emission was influenced by coal, and dust emission by gypsum followed by raw material. Optimization of the end-of-pipe technologies treating dust showed that a combination of 100% of the electro precipitator and 2.4% of the fiber filter gives the lowest cost. The SOx case showed that a combination of 100% of the dry addition process and 25.88% of the wet scrubber gives the lowest cost. Salient feature of this research is that it proposed a method for identifying environmentally problematic input/environmental emissions of the manufacturing processes, in particular, cement manufacturing process. Another feature is that it showed a method for selecting the optimum combination of the end-of-pipe treatment technologies.
목차 (Table of Contents)
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 박영규, "시멘트산업공정에서의 CO2배출량 저감을 위한 청정기술 적용에 관한 연구" 한국청정기술학회 16 (16): 182-190, 2010
2 Korea Environmental Industry & Technology Institute (KEITI), "The webpage of LCI DB"
3 United States Environmental Protection Agency, "Technical Bullentin: Nitrogen oxides, Why and how they are controlled" Clean Air Technology Center 1999
4 Seo, H. S., "Regression analysis with Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS)" SPSS academy 2003
5 Samprit, C., "Regression Analysis by Example" Wiley & Sons 2012
6 "Pre´ Consultants bv, SimaPro Software v. 4.0"
7 Lee, T. S., "Practical regression analysis using Minitab" Free academy 2011
8 Karkoszka, T., "Minimization of environmental risk by optimization of the end-of-pipe processes" 49 (49): 499-506, 2011
9 Paul, M., "Measuring Behaviour: An Introductory Guide" Cambridge University Press 2007
10 Frederick, S. H., "Introduction to Operation Research Ninth Edition" The Mac Graw Hilll 2010
1 박영규, "시멘트산업공정에서의 CO2배출량 저감을 위한 청정기술 적용에 관한 연구" 한국청정기술학회 16 (16): 182-190, 2010
2 Korea Environmental Industry & Technology Institute (KEITI), "The webpage of LCI DB"
3 United States Environmental Protection Agency, "Technical Bullentin: Nitrogen oxides, Why and how they are controlled" Clean Air Technology Center 1999
4 Seo, H. S., "Regression analysis with Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS)" SPSS academy 2003
5 Samprit, C., "Regression Analysis by Example" Wiley & Sons 2012
6 "Pre´ Consultants bv, SimaPro Software v. 4.0"
7 Lee, T. S., "Practical regression analysis using Minitab" Free academy 2011
8 Karkoszka, T., "Minimization of environmental risk by optimization of the end-of-pipe processes" 49 (49): 499-506, 2011
9 Paul, M., "Measuring Behaviour: An Introductory Guide" Cambridge University Press 2007
10 Frederick, S. H., "Introduction to Operation Research Ninth Edition" The Mac Graw Hilll 2010
11 Korea National Cleaner Production Center, "Industrial technology innovation business [Cleaner service operating & Dissemination base build] annual report" 2016
12 Green Growth Korea, "Green Growth National Strategy : Five- Year Plan" Green Growth committee 2009
13 Till M. B., "Environmental costbenefit analysis and the EU Industrial Emissions Directive: Exploring the societal efficiency of a DeNOx retrofit at a coal-fired power plant" 68 : 125-139, 2014
14 Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, "Environmental Lifecycle Inventories of Energy Systems An Environmental Database for the Accounting of Energy Inputs in Product Life Cycle Assessment and the Comparative Assessment of Energy Systems" Institute of Energy Technology 1994
15 Gong. S. Y., "Comparison of Korea Emission limit values with achievable emission levels in EU BREFs and Case study on Best Available Technique Introduction Cost" Korea Environment Institute 2013
16 Alejandro, J., "Comparative analysis of available life cycle inventories of cement in the EU" Cement and Concrete Research 2004
17 Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology, "Cleaner Production 3.0, The future of developing cleaner production" KEIT 2013
18 Razuana, R., "Carbon dioxide emission reduction through cleaner production strategies in a recycled plastic resins producing plant" 141 : 1067-1073, 2016
19 Frauke., I. K., "Best Available Techniques (BAT) Reference Document for the Production of Cement, Lime and Magnesium Oxide, Industrial Emissions Directive 2010/75/EU Integrated Pollution Prevention and control" 2013
20 Irina, H., "Assessing the impact of cost optimization based on infrastructure modeling on CO2 emissions" 131 : 313-321, 2011
21 Intron, "An Overview of Available LCI Data: Cement, Concrete and other Building Materials" Intron 1997
22 Ott, R. L., "An Introduction to Statistial Methods & Data Analysis" CENGAGE Learning 2015
23 Ajou University, "A study on analysis of factory input output information and deriving optimization method, annual report" Eco-Product Research Institute 2016
24 Deborah, N. H., "A life-cycle assessment of Portland cement manufacturing: comparing the traditional process with alternative technologies" 17 : 668-675, 2009
유기물 및 영양염류로 오염된 해양퇴적물 정화를 위한 석회석, 모래, 제올라이트의 반응성 피복 소재로서 적용성 평가
세라믹 여재를 활용한 상향류식 여과형 비점오염저감시설의 최적 운전 및 역세척 조건
미생물연료전지에서 전극구조가 기질분해에 미치는 영향 연구
학술지 이력
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2027 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
2021-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | |
2018-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) | |
2017-12-01 | 평가 | 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) | |
2013-01-01 | 평가 | 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) | |
2010-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2008-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2006-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2004-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2001-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | |
1998-07-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) |
학술지 인용정보
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 0.52 | 0.52 | 0.45 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
0.43 | 0.42 | 0.604 | 0.13 |