태평양전쟁직후 한일(韓日) 소설에서 ‘전쟁’을 기억하는 방식 비교 연구 = A Comparative Study on the Way of Remembering ‘the War’ in Korean and Japanese Novels just after the Pacific War

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study examined how the war was remembered in Korean and
Japanese novels written just after the Pacific War by comparing Park Rho
‐gap’s Hwan (歡) and Umezaki Haruo’s Sakurajima (櫻桃). The historical
background of the two novels is both just before the 15th of August in
1945, and it ends with the news of the termination of the war on the 15th
of August. In describing the atmosphere after the end of the war, Park
Rho‐gap’s Hwan expresses ‘jubilation’ but Umezaki Haruo’s Sakurajima
expresses futile despair like evanescently falling cherry blossoms in the
form of ‘abstinence.’
In Park Rho‐gap’s Hwan, the code through which the author remembers
the Pacific War is ‘unpatriotic person.’ As the war situation grows worse,
Japan mobilizes Koreans for the war on the pretext that Koreans are also
‘criticizes’. That is, it assumes to give Koreans suffrage and treat them as
‘criticizes’ in reward for fighting in the war. Kim laments the fate of Korean
young people conscripted for Japanese aggressive war, and criticizes the
Japanese government’s deceptive schemes. Just before the liberation,
Korean intellectuals focused their attention on Japanese exploitation
policies but were ignorant of the progress of the 2nd World War and
political situations.
In Umezaki Haruo’s Sakurajima, the code through which the author
remembers the Pacific War is ‘replacement.’ As the aggressive war initiated
by Japan has reached its last stages, Japan mobilizes for the war not only
the colonists but also its own innocent common people in the form of
replacements, national service men, volunteers, etc. The writer spotlights
conflicts between replacements and volunteers, and criticizes the human
right abuses through replacements who are nothing to do with the war.
The author points out problems in the war, but his sense of shame is
somewhat mixed because it is his own country’s militarism that provoked
the war.
The fact that the codes for Korean and Japanese writers’ perception of
the Pacific War are ‘unpatriotic person’ and ‘replacement,’ respectively,
has a significant implication. From the 15th of August, 1945 on, Korean
literature waged struggles to build an independent country based on the
concept of ‘citizens’ and Japanese literature started its efforts to establish
democracy based on the concept of ‘human rights.’

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 1. 서론
• 2. 종전(終戰)을 맞이하는 시각의 차이, 환희와 절제
• 3. 박노갑의 ｢歡｣에 나타난 ‘비국민’의 의의
• 4. 우메자키 하루오의 ｢櫻桃｣에 나탄 ‘보충병’의 의의
• 5. 결론
• <참고문헌>
• [Abstracts]

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 조르조 아감벤, "호모사케르" 새물결 2008

2 W.G. 비즐리, "일본근현대사" 을유문화사 2004

3 쇼 마사오, "일본 현대 문학사,상" 문학과지성사 1998

4 박노갑, "안개거리" 깊은샘 1989

5 우메자키 하루오, "사꾸라지마" 소화 2002

6 조진기, "비교문학의 이론과 실천" 새문사 2006

7 배기정, "박노갑소설의 변모양상 연구-민족현실인식을 중심으로" 155-177, 1991

8 강심호, "박노갑 소설의 현실인식 고찰" 일지사 152-179, 2004

9 신진경, "박노갑 소설의 공간 연구" 건국대학교 1995

10 한새롬, "박노갑 소설 연구:소설 공간과 인물 유형을 중심으로" 중앙대학교 2002

11 최학, "도촌 박노갑의 생애와 문학" 3 : 345-369,

12 니시카와 나가오, "국민이라는 괴물" 소명출판 2002

13 서경석, "고통과 기억의 연대는 가능한가?" 철수와영희 2009

14 吉田精一, "現代日本文學史" 정음사 1984

15 티무라히데끼, "梅崎春生 櫻島 論 - 軍刀の意味(變化)を中心に -" 10 : 219-237,

16 이중연, "‘황국신민’의 시대" 혜안 2003