RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      영어의 젠더중립 단수대명사 ‘They’의 Phi-자질과 분포 = On the Phi-Features of English Ungendered Singular Pronoun THEY

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107985888

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper aims to discuss the demise and shift of phi-features in English pronouns, in particular, THEY used as a 3rd person, singular, non-binary, and gender-neutral pronoun. It has been argued that pronouns have been considered as a hybrid category...

      This paper aims to discuss the demise and shift of phi-features in English pronouns, in particular, THEY used as a 3rd person, singular, non-binary, and gender-neutral pronoun. It has been argued that pronouns have been considered as a hybrid category between functional and lexical (Zimman 2016, Gelderen 2017). As recent as Dec., 2019, a singular-they has attracted much attention from linguists, journalists, and grammarians in the world, for the obvious reasons that the English language officially selected the epicene-they (Balhorn 2004) as Word of the Year (Merriam-Webster Dictionary). The surge of the word THEY as a non-binary (ungendered) singular pronoun is extremely engaging in one hand, while the morphosyntactic consequences of its novel form seem quite murky and nebulous, especially from a heuristic perspective such as an EFL/ESL context. It is argued in this paper that pronouns, belonging to “a weaker category”, are more susceptible to their morphosyntactic changes whose recent appearance as a singular-THEY is the consequence of such weakness and instability in their feature matrix. The changes of the phi-features, particularly gender and number features in singular-THEY, are due to the language usage of the speakers’ level of participation in this grammatical change, as well as to the diversity of sociolinguistic environment.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 1. 서론 2. 단수 대명사-‘they’의 분포: 총칭성, 젠더중립성, 담화결속성 3. ESL/EFL관점에서의 단수-‘They’의 문제점 4. 결론
      • 1. 서론 2. 단수 대명사-‘they’의 분포: 총칭성, 젠더중립성, 담화결속성 3. ESL/EFL관점에서의 단수-‘They’의 문제점 4. 결론
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 홍성심, "링구아프랑카, 영어의 비하인드 스토리" 궁미디어 2021

      2 "https://www.vogue.in/culture-and-living/content/gender-neutral-pronouns-are-important-not-everyone-identifies-with-he-or-she"

      3 "https://www.englishforums.com/English/WouldRatherThat/dnndq/post.htm"

      4 "http://grammar.ccc.commnet.edu/grammar/one.htm"

      5 Chomsky, N., "Three Factors in Language Design" 36 : 1-22, 2005

      6 Pullum, G., "The Truth about English Grammar: Rarely Pure and Never Simple" 2010

      7 Baltin, M., "The Structural Signature of Pronoun" New York University 2012

      8 Balhorn, M., "The Rise of Epicene They" 32 : 79-104, 2004

      9 Zuber, S., "The Politics of Grammar Handbooks : Generic ‘He’and Singular ‘They’" 55 : 515-530, 1993

      10 Huddleston, R., "The Oxford Handbook of English Grammar" Oxford University Press 201-221, 2016

      1 홍성심, "링구아프랑카, 영어의 비하인드 스토리" 궁미디어 2021

      2 "https://www.vogue.in/culture-and-living/content/gender-neutral-pronouns-are-important-not-everyone-identifies-with-he-or-she"

      3 "https://www.englishforums.com/English/WouldRatherThat/dnndq/post.htm"

      4 "http://grammar.ccc.commnet.edu/grammar/one.htm"

      5 Chomsky, N., "Three Factors in Language Design" 36 : 1-22, 2005

      6 Pullum, G., "The Truth about English Grammar: Rarely Pure and Never Simple" 2010

      7 Baltin, M., "The Structural Signature of Pronoun" New York University 2012

      8 Balhorn, M., "The Rise of Epicene They" 32 : 79-104, 2004

      9 Zuber, S., "The Politics of Grammar Handbooks : Generic ‘He’and Singular ‘They’" 55 : 515-530, 1993

      10 Huddleston, R., "The Oxford Handbook of English Grammar" Oxford University Press 201-221, 2016

      11 R.W. Burchfield, "The New Fowler's Modern English Usage" Oxford University Press 1996

      12 Chomsky, N., "The Minimalist Program" MIT Press 1995

      13 Sungshim Hong, "The English Tag Question: A Non-Elliptical Minimalist Approach" Society of Modern Grammar 2017 (2017): 55-83, 2017

      14 Huddleston, R., "The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language" Cambridge University Press 2005

      15 Chomsky, N., "Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik" MIT Press 89-155, 2000

      16 Bjorkmann, B., "Singular They and the Syntactic Representation of Gender in English" 2 : 1-13, 2017

      17 Sklar, E., "Sexist Grammar Revisited" 45 : 348-358, 1983

      18 Merriam-Webster, "Merriam-Webster Dictionary of English Usage" 2016

      19 Abbott, G., "Language Close up : Unisex ‘They’" 38 : 45-48, 1984

      20 Konnelly, L., "Gender Diversity and Morphosyntax : An Account of Singular They" 5 : 1-19, 2020

      21 Garner, B., "Garner’s Modern English Usage" Oxford University Press 2016

      22 J. Butterfield, "Fowler's Dictionary of Modern English Usage" 2015

      23 Déchaine, R. -M., "Decomposing Pronouns" 33 : 409-442, 2002

      24 Conrod, K., "Changes in Singular They" University of Washington 2018

      25 Carter, R., "Cambridge Grammar of English : A Comprehensive Guide Soken and Written English Grammar and Usage" Cambridge University Press 2006

      26 Radford, A., "Analyzing English Sentences : A Minimalist Approach" Cambridge University Press 2009

      27 Gelderen, E., "An Introduction to Minimalism" John Benjamins Publishing Company 2017

      28 Montalbetti, M., "After Binding" MIT 1984

      29 Conrod, K., "Abolishing Gender on D. Handout material"

      30 Hong, S., "A and A-bar Binding in Korean and English : A Government and Binding Parameters" University of Connecticut 1985

      31 Gelderen, E., "A History of English Reflexive Pronouns : Person, Self, and Interpretability" John Benjamins Publishing Company 2000

      32 Quirk, R., "A Grammar of Contemporary English" Longman 1972

      33 Quirk, R., "A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language" Longman 1985

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2002-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.39 0.39 0.34
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.33 0.34 0.709 0.06
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼