RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      전통문화를 통해 본 교사의 위상과 바람직한 교사상 = The Position of Teachers and the Desirable Image of Teachers as Seen through Traditional Cultures

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99945275

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The issues of the establishment of one`s identity as a Korean and the recovery of morality lost due to confusion in values, which have emerged as important matters of social concern today, are representative topics that can also be discussed in relation to education in the present era. This is because establishing one`s own upright values in the swiftly changing reality of today, establishing the guideposts of one`s life accordingly, and living happily together with others are the ultimate goals of our lives and, to attain such goals, the role of education is of foremost significance. Consequently, we must not only establish desirable goals based on traditional values but also properly inherit traditional values and devise desirable and future-oriented education demanded by a changed society. The academic tradition of Confucianism lies in the cultivation of moral character through virtues and practical education for virtuous conduct and directly affects our learning, education, and culture even today. Grounded on the universal values of Confucianism, the philosophy of traditional values is based on inner cultivation and outer praxis, and traditional view of the duty of teachers is akin to the academic tradition of Confucianism because it likewise pursues the universal values of Confucianism, which thus are moral virtues. One has surely heard the expression “Although there are teachers, there are no mentors; although there are students, there are no disciples.” When teachers and mentors are contrasted, the former designate professionals who transmit expert knowledge or techniques. On the other hand, mentors designate those who, in addition to playing this role as teachers, morally influence students with their love of the truth and of their disciples (role model). The former can be called “teachers of classics” (jingshi) while the latter can be called “teachers of men” (renshi).It is clear that, in our reality, the social status or economic conditions or teachers are adverse and that factors outside education such as burdensome administrative duties function negatively in teachers` fulfillment of their true role as mentors, which can be expressed as being “teachers of men.” However, because teachers are in a position directly to educate students, it is difficult categorically to deny that the primary responsibility for overcoming such problems lies with teachers themselves. Consequently, teachers must not forsake their true duty as teachers, leaving the responsibility solely to the state or society. Because they must be preceded by critique, the explication and employment of tradition in a manner suitable to reality are by no means easy tasks. Nevertheless, it will be possible to explain the reasons for our existence in reality only after such basic efforts. The issues of the establishment of one`s identity as a Korean and the recovery of morality lost due to confusion in values, which have emerged as important matters of social concern today, are representative topics that can also be discussed in relation to education in the present era. This is because establishing one`s own upright values in the swiftly changing reality of today, establishing the guideposts of one`s life accordingly, and living happily together with others are the ultimate goals of our lives and, to attain such goals, the role of education is of foremost significance. Consequently, we must not only establish desirable goals based on traditional values but also properly inherit traditional values and devise desirable and future-oriented education demanded by a changed society. The academic tradition of Confucianism lies in the cultivation of moral character through virtues and practical education for virtuous conduct and directly affects our learning, education, and culture even today. Grounded on the universal values of Confucianism, the philosophy of traditional values is based on inner cultivation and outer praxis, and traditional view of the duty of teachers is akin to the academic tradition of Confucianism because it likewise pursues theniversal values of Confucianism, which thus are moral virtues. One has surely heard the expression “Although there are teachers, there are no mentors; although there are students, there are no disciples.” When teachers and mentors are contrasted, the former designate professionals who transmit expert knowledge or techniques. On the other hand, mentors designate those who, in addition to playing this role as teachers, morally influence students with their love of the truth and of their disciples (role model). The former can be called “teachers of classics” (jingshi) while the latter can be called “teachers of men” (renshi). It is clear that, in our reality, the social status or economic conditions or teachers are adverse and that factors outside education such as burdensome administrative duties function negatively in teachers` fulfillment of their true role as mentors, which can be expressed as being “teachers of men.” However, because teachers are in a position directly to educate students, it is difficult categorically to deny that the primary responsibility for overcoming such problems lies with teachers themselves. Consequently, teachers must not forsake their true duty as teachers, leaving the responsibility solely to the state or society. Because they must be preceded by critique, the explication and employment of tradition in a manner suitable to reality are by no means easy tasks. Nevertheless, it will be possible to explain the reasons for our existence in reality only after such basic efforts.
      번역하기

      The issues of the establishment of one`s identity as a Korean and the recovery of morality lost due to confusion in values, which have emerged as important matters of social concern today, are representative topics that can also be discussed in relati...

      The issues of the establishment of one`s identity as a Korean and the recovery of morality lost due to confusion in values, which have emerged as important matters of social concern today, are representative topics that can also be discussed in relation to education in the present era. This is because establishing one`s own upright values in the swiftly changing reality of today, establishing the guideposts of one`s life accordingly, and living happily together with others are the ultimate goals of our lives and, to attain such goals, the role of education is of foremost significance. Consequently, we must not only establish desirable goals based on traditional values but also properly inherit traditional values and devise desirable and future-oriented education demanded by a changed society. The academic tradition of Confucianism lies in the cultivation of moral character through virtues and practical education for virtuous conduct and directly affects our learning, education, and culture even today. Grounded on the universal values of Confucianism, the philosophy of traditional values is based on inner cultivation and outer praxis, and traditional view of the duty of teachers is akin to the academic tradition of Confucianism because it likewise pursues the universal values of Confucianism, which thus are moral virtues. One has surely heard the expression “Although there are teachers, there are no mentors; although there are students, there are no disciples.” When teachers and mentors are contrasted, the former designate professionals who transmit expert knowledge or techniques. On the other hand, mentors designate those who, in addition to playing this role as teachers, morally influence students with their love of the truth and of their disciples (role model). The former can be called “teachers of classics” (jingshi) while the latter can be called “teachers of men” (renshi).It is clear that, in our reality, the social status or economic conditions or teachers are adverse and that factors outside education such as burdensome administrative duties function negatively in teachers` fulfillment of their true role as mentors, which can be expressed as being “teachers of men.” However, because teachers are in a position directly to educate students, it is difficult categorically to deny that the primary responsibility for overcoming such problems lies with teachers themselves. Consequently, teachers must not forsake their true duty as teachers, leaving the responsibility solely to the state or society. Because they must be preceded by critique, the explication and employment of tradition in a manner suitable to reality are by no means easy tasks. Nevertheless, it will be possible to explain the reasons for our existence in reality only after such basic efforts. The issues of the establishment of one`s identity as a Korean and the recovery of morality lost due to confusion in values, which have emerged as important matters of social concern today, are representative topics that can also be discussed in relation to education in the present era. This is because establishing one`s own upright values in the swiftly changing reality of today, establishing the guideposts of one`s life accordingly, and living happily together with others are the ultimate goals of our lives and, to attain such goals, the role of education is of foremost significance. Consequently, we must not only establish desirable goals based on traditional values but also properly inherit traditional values and devise desirable and future-oriented education demanded by a changed society. The academic tradition of Confucianism lies in the cultivation of moral character through virtues and practical education for virtuous conduct and directly affects our learning, education, and culture even today. Grounded on the universal values of Confucianism, the philosophy of traditional values is based on inner cultivation and outer praxis, and traditional view of the duty of teachers is akin to the academic tradition of Confucianism because it likewise pursues theniversal values of Confucianism, which thus are moral virtues. One has surely heard the expression “Although there are teachers, there are no mentors; although there are students, there are no disciples.” When teachers and mentors are contrasted, the former designate professionals who transmit expert knowledge or techniques. On the other hand, mentors designate those who, in addition to playing this role as teachers, morally influence students with their love of the truth and of their disciples (role model). The former can be called “teachers of classics” (jingshi) while the latter can be called “teachers of men” (renshi). It is clear that, in our reality, the social status or economic conditions or teachers are adverse and that factors outside education such as burdensome administrative duties function negatively in teachers` fulfillment of their true role as mentors, which can be expressed as being “teachers of men.” However, because teachers are in a position directly to educate students, it is difficult categorically to deny that the primary responsibility for overcoming such problems lies with teachers themselves. Consequently, teachers must not forsake their true duty as teachers, leaving the responsibility solely to the state or society. Because they must be preceded by critique, the explication and employment of tradition in a manner suitable to reality are by no means easy tasks. Nevertheless, it will be possible to explain the reasons for our existence in reality only after such basic efforts.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 권문봉, "栗谷의 敎育改革論 考察" 우리한문학회 15 (15): 259-289, 2006

      2 "栗谷全書"

      3 "論語"

      4 지준호, "한국전통사상의 현대적 계승을 통한 바람직한 청소년의 가치관 모색" 유교문화연구소 1 (1): 5-36, 2010

      5 김경호, "학교모범에 나타난 율곡의 교육사상" 6 : 2006

      6 윤용남, "퇴계 이황의 사도관" 95 : 1997

      7 지준호, "초등학생들의 자기인식 및 자기관리 능력 함양 방안 연구 - 유학의 가치ㆍ덕목을 중심으로 -" 한국철학사연구회 (25) : 41-70, 2009

      8 이동준, "전통적 가치관의 현대적 성찰, 동방사상논고(一)" 성균관대학교 한국철학과 1994

      9 이동준, "전통문화의 가치관" 문우사 1986

      10 지교헌, "사회변천 중의 師弟 관계( 너희 중에 죄 없는 자가 먼저 돌로 치라 )" 한누리미디어 2003

      1 권문봉, "栗谷의 敎育改革論 考察" 우리한문학회 15 (15): 259-289, 2006

      2 "栗谷全書"

      3 "論語"

      4 지준호, "한국전통사상의 현대적 계승을 통한 바람직한 청소년의 가치관 모색" 유교문화연구소 1 (1): 5-36, 2010

      5 김경호, "학교모범에 나타난 율곡의 교육사상" 6 : 2006

      6 윤용남, "퇴계 이황의 사도관" 95 : 1997

      7 지준호, "초등학생들의 자기인식 및 자기관리 능력 함양 방안 연구 - 유학의 가치ㆍ덕목을 중심으로 -" 한국철학사연구회 (25) : 41-70, 2009

      8 이동준, "전통적 가치관의 현대적 성찰, 동방사상논고(一)" 성균관대학교 한국철학과 1994

      9 이동준, "전통문화의 가치관" 문우사 1986

      10 지교헌, "사회변천 중의 師弟 관계( 너희 중에 죄 없는 자가 먼저 돌로 치라 )" 한누리미디어 2003

      11 고병익, "동아시아의 전통" 일조각 1982

      12 지준호, "대만 예비교사들의 전통관 연구" 초등교육연구원 19 (19): 1-19, 2009

      13 "靜菴集"

      14 "退溪集"

      15 "荀子"

      16 "禮記"

      17 "孟子"

      18 "四書大全"

      19 "周易"

      20 지준호, "君子의 人格과 公共性" 한국철학사연구회 (26) : 249-271, 2009

      21 "古文眞寶"

      22 "中庸"

      23 "三字經"

      24 "三國遺事"

      25 홍일식, "21세기와 한국전통문화" 현대문학 1993

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022-03-08 학회명변경 영문명 : Elementary Education Research Center -> Elementary Education Research Institute KCI등재
      2022 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2013-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-12-08 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Korean Journal of Elementary Education KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS () KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 () KCI등재후보
      2007-05-03 학회명변경 한글명 : 초등교육연구소 -> 초등교육연구원
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.96 0.96 1.03
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.92 0.89 1.375 0.14
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼