RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCIE SCOPUS

      Randomized Phase II Study of Pemetrexed Versus Gefitinib in Previously Treated Patients with Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103570535

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pemetrexed versus gefitinib in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously treated with chemotherapy. Materials and Methods Patients with advanced (stage IIIB or...

      Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pemetrexed versus gefitinib in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously treated with chemotherapy.

      Materials and Methods Patients with advanced (stage IIIB or IV) or recurrent NSCLC were randomly assigned to receive either 500 mg/m! of pemetrexed intravenously every 3 weeks or gefitinib 250 mg/day orally. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months.

      Results A total of 95 patients were enrolled (47 for pemetrexed and 48 for gefitinib). Most patients were male (72%) and current/ex-smokers (69%), and 80% had non-squamous cell carci- noma. The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status was determined in 38 patients (40%); one patient per each arm was positive for EGFR mutation. The 6-month PFS rates were 22% and 15% for pemetrexed and gefitinib, respectively (p=0.35). Both arms showed an identical median PFS of 2.0 months and a median overall survival (OS) of 8.5 months. In EGFR wild-type patients, higher response rate (RR) and longer PFS as well as OS were achieved via pemetrexed compared with gefitinib, although there were no signifi- cant differences (RR: 39% vs. 9%, p=0.07; median PFS: 6.6 months vs. 3.1 months, p=0.45; median OS: 29.6 months vs. 12.9 months, p=0.62). Toxicities were mild in both treatment arms. Frequently reported toxicities were anemia and fatigue for pemetrexed, and skin rash and anorexia for gefitinib.

      Conclusion Both pemetrexed and gefitinib had similar efficacy with good tolerability as second-line treat- ment in unselected patients with advanced NSCLC. However, pemetrexed is considered more effective than gefitinib for EGFR wild-type patients.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Scagliotti G, "The differential efficacy of pemetrexed according to NSCLC histology : a review of two phase III studies" 14 : 253-263, 2009

      2 Hanna N, "Randomized phase III trial of pemetrexed versus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with chemotherapy" 22 : 1589-1597, 2004

      3 Kawaguchi T, "Randomized phase III trial of erlotinib versus docetaxel as second-or third-line therapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer : Docetaxel and Erlotinib Lung Cancer Trial(DELTA)" 32 : 1902-1908, 2014

      4 Fossella FV, "Randomized phase III trial of docetaxel versus vinorelbine or ifosfamide in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with platinumcontaining chemotherapy regimens. The TAX 320 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Study Group" 18 : 2354-2362, 2000

      5 Shepherd FA, "Prospective randomized trial of docetaxel versus best supportive care in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy" 18 : 2095-2103, 2000

      6 Maruyama R, "Phase III study, V-15-32, of gefitinib versus docetaxel in previously treated Japanese patients with non-small-cell lung cancer" 26 : 4244-4252, 2008

      7 Scagliotti GV, "Phase III study comparing cisplatin plus gemcitabine with cisplatin plus pemetrexed in chemotherapynaive patients with advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer" 26 : 3543-3551, 2008

      8 Karampeazis A, "Pemetrexed versus erlotinib in pretreated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer : a Hellenic Oncology Research Group(HORG)randomized phase 3 study" 119 : 2754-2764, 2013

      9 Paz-Ares LG, "PARAMOUNT : final overall survival results of thephase III study of maintenance pemetrexed versus placebo immediately after induction treatment with pemetrexed plus cisplatin for advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer" 31 : 2895-2902, 2013

      10 Douillard JY, "Molecular predictors of outcome with gefitinib and docetaxel in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer : data from the randomized phase III INTEREST trial" 28 : 744-752, 2010

      1 Scagliotti G, "The differential efficacy of pemetrexed according to NSCLC histology : a review of two phase III studies" 14 : 253-263, 2009

      2 Hanna N, "Randomized phase III trial of pemetrexed versus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with chemotherapy" 22 : 1589-1597, 2004

      3 Kawaguchi T, "Randomized phase III trial of erlotinib versus docetaxel as second-or third-line therapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer : Docetaxel and Erlotinib Lung Cancer Trial(DELTA)" 32 : 1902-1908, 2014

      4 Fossella FV, "Randomized phase III trial of docetaxel versus vinorelbine or ifosfamide in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with platinumcontaining chemotherapy regimens. The TAX 320 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Study Group" 18 : 2354-2362, 2000

      5 Shepherd FA, "Prospective randomized trial of docetaxel versus best supportive care in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy" 18 : 2095-2103, 2000

      6 Maruyama R, "Phase III study, V-15-32, of gefitinib versus docetaxel in previously treated Japanese patients with non-small-cell lung cancer" 26 : 4244-4252, 2008

      7 Scagliotti GV, "Phase III study comparing cisplatin plus gemcitabine with cisplatin plus pemetrexed in chemotherapynaive patients with advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer" 26 : 3543-3551, 2008

      8 Karampeazis A, "Pemetrexed versus erlotinib in pretreated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer : a Hellenic Oncology Research Group(HORG)randomized phase 3 study" 119 : 2754-2764, 2013

      9 Paz-Ares LG, "PARAMOUNT : final overall survival results of thephase III study of maintenance pemetrexed versus placebo immediately after induction treatment with pemetrexed plus cisplatin for advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer" 31 : 2895-2902, 2013

      10 Douillard JY, "Molecular predictors of outcome with gefitinib and docetaxel in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer : data from the randomized phase III INTEREST trial" 28 : 744-752, 2010

      11 Ciuleanu T, "Maintenance pemetrexed plus best supportive care versus placebo plus best supportive care for non-smallcell lung cancer : a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 study" 374 : 1432-1440, 2009

      12 Lee CK, "Impact of EGFR inhibitor in non-small cell lung cancer on progression-free and overall survival : a meta-analysis" 105 : 595-605, 2013

      13 Sun JM, "Gefitinib versus pemetrexed as second-line treatment in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy (KCSG-LU08-01): an open-label, phase 3 trial" 118 : 6234-6242, 2012

      14 Kim ES, "Gefitinib versus docetaxel in previously treated non-smallcell lung cancer(INTEREST) : a randomised phase III trial" 372 : 1809-1818, 2008

      15 Thatcher N, "Gefitinib plus best supportive care in previously treated patients with refractory advanced non-small-cell lung cancer : results from a randomised, placebo-controlled, multicentre study(Iressa Survival Evaluation in Lung Cancer)" 366 : 1527-1537, 2005

      16 Garassino MC, "Erlotinib versus docetaxel as second-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and wild-type EGFR tumours(TAILOR) : a randomised controlled trial" 14 : 981-988, 2013

      17 Ciuleanu T, "Efficacy and safety of erlotinib versus chemotherapy in second-line treatment of patients with advanced, non-small-cell lung cancer with poor prognosis(TITAN) : a randomised multicentre, open-label, phase 3 study" 13 : 300-308, 2012

      18 Govindan R, "Changing epidemiology of small-cell lung cancer in the United States over the last 30 years : analysis of the surveillance, epidemiologic, and end results database" 24 : 4539-4544, 2006

      19 Siegel R, "Cancer statistics, 2013" 63 : 11-30, 2013

      20 정규원, "Cancer Statistics in Korea: Incidence, Mortality, Survival and Prevalence in 2010" 대한암학회 45 (45): 1-14, 2013

      21 Azzoli CG, "American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline update on chemotherapy for stage IV non-smallcell lung cancer" 27 : 6251-6266, 2009

      22 Yang J, "A phase II trial comparing pemetrexed with gefitinib as the second-line treatment of nonsquamous NSCLC patients with wild-type EGFR (CTONG0806)" American Society of Clinical Oncology 2013

      23 Azzoli CG, "2011 Focused update of 2009 American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline update on chemotherapy for stage IV non-small-celllung cancer" 29 : 3825-3831, 2011

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2024 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2020-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재후보
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-05-27 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한암학회지 -> Cancer Research and Treatment KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 3.58 0.89 3.01
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      2.62 2.28 1.846 0.26
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼