RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      A New Electrophysiological Method for the Diagnosis of Extraforaminal Stenosis at L5–S1

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105943743

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Study Design: A retrospective study. Purpose: To examine the effectiveness of using an electrodiagnostic technique as a new approach in the clinical diagnosis of extraforaminal stenosis at L5–S1. Overview of Literature: We introduced a new effective...

      Study Design: A retrospective study.
      Purpose: To examine the effectiveness of using an electrodiagnostic technique as a new approach in the clinical diagnosis of extraforaminal stenosis at L5–S1.
      Overview of Literature: We introduced a new effective approach to the diagnosis of extraforaminal stenosis at the lumbosacral junction using the existing electrophysiological evaluation technique.
      Methods: A consecutive series of 124 patients with fifth lumbar radiculopathy were enrolled, comprising a group of 74 patients with spinal canal stenosis and a second group of 50 patients with extraforaminal stenosis at L5–S1. The technique involved inserting a pair of needle electrodes into the foraminal exit zone of the fifth lumbar spinal nerves, which were used to provide electrical stimulation.
      The compound muscle action potentials from each of the tibialis anterior muscles were recorded.
      Results: The distal motor latency (DML) of the potentials ranged from 11.2 to 24.6 milliseconds in patients with extraforaminal stenosis.
      In contrast, the DML in patients with spinal canal stenosis ranged from 10.0 to 17.2 milliseconds. After comparing the DML of each of the 2 groups and at the same time comparing the differences in DML between the affected and unaffected side of each patient, we concluded there were statistically significant differences (p <0.01) between the 2 groups. Using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the cutoff values were calculated to be 15.2 milliseconds and 1.1 milliseconds, respectively.
      Conclusions: This approach using a means of DML measurement enables us to identify and localize lesions, which offers an advantage in diagnosing extraforaminal stenosis at L5–S1.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Nathan H, "The lumbosacral ligament (LSL), with special emphasis on the “lumbosacral tunnel” and the entrapment of the 5th lumbar nerve" 6 : 197-202, 1982

      2 Macnab I, "Negative disc exploration. An analysis of the causes of nerve-root involvement in sixty-eight patients" 53 : 891-903, 1971

      3 Jablecki CK, "Literature review of the usefulness of nerve conduction studies and electromyography for the evaluation of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. AAEM Quality Assurance Committee" 16 : 1392-1414, 1993

      4 Transfeldt EE, "Ligaments of the lumbosacral spine and their role in possible extraforaminal spinal nerve entrapment and tethering" 6 : 507-512, 1993

      5 Matsumoto M, "Extraforaminal entrapment of the fifth lumbar spinal nerve by osteophytes of the lumbosacral spine: anatomic study and a report of four cases" 27 : E169-E173, 2002

      6 Olsewski JM, "Evidence from cadavers suggestive of entrapment of fifth lumbar spinal nerves by lumbosacral ligaments" 16 : 336-347, 1991

      7 Kimura J, "Electrodiagnosis in disease of nerve and muscle: principles and practice" F.A. Davis Co 69-73, 1981

      8 Yamada H, "Diagnosis of foraminal and extraforaminal lesions in cases with lumbar radicular pain (in Japanese)" 21 : 115-121, 2008

      9 Kunogi J, "Diagnosis and operative treatment of intraforaminal and extraforaminal nerve root compression" 16 : 1312-1320, 1991

      10 Burton CV, "Causes of failure of surgery on the lumbar spine" (157) : 191-199, 1981

      1 Nathan H, "The lumbosacral ligament (LSL), with special emphasis on the “lumbosacral tunnel” and the entrapment of the 5th lumbar nerve" 6 : 197-202, 1982

      2 Macnab I, "Negative disc exploration. An analysis of the causes of nerve-root involvement in sixty-eight patients" 53 : 891-903, 1971

      3 Jablecki CK, "Literature review of the usefulness of nerve conduction studies and electromyography for the evaluation of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. AAEM Quality Assurance Committee" 16 : 1392-1414, 1993

      4 Transfeldt EE, "Ligaments of the lumbosacral spine and their role in possible extraforaminal spinal nerve entrapment and tethering" 6 : 507-512, 1993

      5 Matsumoto M, "Extraforaminal entrapment of the fifth lumbar spinal nerve by osteophytes of the lumbosacral spine: anatomic study and a report of four cases" 27 : E169-E173, 2002

      6 Olsewski JM, "Evidence from cadavers suggestive of entrapment of fifth lumbar spinal nerves by lumbosacral ligaments" 16 : 336-347, 1991

      7 Kimura J, "Electrodiagnosis in disease of nerve and muscle: principles and practice" F.A. Davis Co 69-73, 1981

      8 Yamada H, "Diagnosis of foraminal and extraforaminal lesions in cases with lumbar radicular pain (in Japanese)" 21 : 115-121, 2008

      9 Kunogi J, "Diagnosis and operative treatment of intraforaminal and extraforaminal nerve root compression" 16 : 1312-1320, 1991

      10 Burton CV, "Causes of failure of surgery on the lumbar spine" (157) : 191-199, 1981

      11 Wiltse LL, "Alar transverse process impingement of the L5 spinal nerve: the far-out syndrome" 9 : 31-41, 1984

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2024 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2020-12-01 평가 등재 탈락 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2013-10-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (기타) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 SCOPUS 등재 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0 0 0
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0 0 0 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼