RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Opendata 기반 포항 및 경주지진에 의한 건물손상 평가

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105338214

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Severe earthquakes can cause damage to society both socially and economically. An appropriate initial response can alleviate damage from severe earthquakes. In order to formulate an appropriate initial response, it is necessary to identify damage situ...

      Severe earthquakes can cause damage to society both socially and economically. An appropriate initial response can alleviate damage from severe earthquakes. In order to formulate an appropriate initial response, it is necessary to identify damage situations in societies; however, it is difficult to grasp this information immediately after an earthquake event. In this study, an earthquake damage assessment methodology for buildings is proposed for estimating damage situations immediately after severe earthquakes. A response spectrum database is constructed to provide response spectra at arbitrary locations from earthquake measurements immediately after the event. The fragility curves are used to estimate the damage of the buildings. Earthquake damage assessment is performed from the response spectrum database at the building scale to provide enhanced damage condition information. Earthquake damage assessment for Gyeongju city and Pohang city were conducted using the proposed methodology, when an earthquake occurred on September 12, 2016, and November 15, 2017. Results confirm that the proposed earthquake damage assessment effectively represented the earthquake damage situation in the city to decide on an appropriate initial response by providing detailed information at the building scale.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • A B S T R A C T
      • 1. 서 론
      • 2. 건물의 지진손상평가 방법론
      • 2.1 응답스펙트럼 데이터베이스
      • 2.2 지진에 의한 건물의 손상 추정
      • A B S T R A C T
      • 1. 서 론
      • 2. 건물의 지진손상평가 방법론
      • 2.1 응답스펙트럼 데이터베이스
      • 2.2 지진에 의한 건물의 손상 추정
      • 3. Opendata를 활용한 건물의 지진손상평가 적용
      • 3.1 경주지진의 지진피해평가
      • 3.2 포항지진의 지진피해평가
      • 3.3 비교 및 논의
      • 4. 결 론
      • REFERENCES
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 임승현, "지반-구조물 상호작용 효과를 고려한 지진격리시스템이 적용된 원전 격납건물의 지진 취약도 평가" 한국지진공학회 17 (17): 53-59, 2013

      2 Sahar L, "Using Aerial Imagery and GIS in Automated Building Footprint Extraction and Shape Recognition for Earthquake Risk Assessment of Urban Inventories" 48 (48): 3511-3520, 2010

      3 "The U.S. Geological Survey"

      4 Shinozuka M, "Statistical Analysis of Fragility Curves" 126 (126): 1224-1231, 2000

      5 Eem SH, "Simplified Methodology for Urban Flood Damage Assessment at Building Scale Using Opendata" 2018

      6 Bai JW, "Probabilistic Assessment of Structural Damage due to Earthquakes for Buildings in Mid-america" 135 (135): 1155-1163, 2009

      7 Central Disaster Safety Measures Headquarters, "Press Releases: Recovery cost of Pohang earthquake"

      8 Canares M, "Open Data Barometer Regional Report: East Asia and the Pacific" World Wide Web Foundation 2016

      9 Davies T, "Open Data Barometer Global Report" World Wide Web Foundation and Data Institute 2015

      10 Tseng CP, "Natural Disaster Management Mechanisms for Probabilistic Earthquake Loss" 60 (60): 1055-1063, 2012

      1 임승현, "지반-구조물 상호작용 효과를 고려한 지진격리시스템이 적용된 원전 격납건물의 지진 취약도 평가" 한국지진공학회 17 (17): 53-59, 2013

      2 Sahar L, "Using Aerial Imagery and GIS in Automated Building Footprint Extraction and Shape Recognition for Earthquake Risk Assessment of Urban Inventories" 48 (48): 3511-3520, 2010

      3 "The U.S. Geological Survey"

      4 Shinozuka M, "Statistical Analysis of Fragility Curves" 126 (126): 1224-1231, 2000

      5 Eem SH, "Simplified Methodology for Urban Flood Damage Assessment at Building Scale Using Opendata" 2018

      6 Bai JW, "Probabilistic Assessment of Structural Damage due to Earthquakes for Buildings in Mid-america" 135 (135): 1155-1163, 2009

      7 Central Disaster Safety Measures Headquarters, "Press Releases: Recovery cost of Pohang earthquake"

      8 Canares M, "Open Data Barometer Regional Report: East Asia and the Pacific" World Wide Web Foundation 2016

      9 Davies T, "Open Data Barometer Global Report" World Wide Web Foundation and Data Institute 2015

      10 Tseng CP, "Natural Disaster Management Mechanisms for Probabilistic Earthquake Loss" 60 (60): 1055-1063, 2012

      11 Song TJ, "Information Inside: National Earthquake Comprehensive Information System, Convergence of Earthquake and IT" 87 : 42-45, 2014

      12 Scawthorn C, "HAZUS-MH Flood Loss Estimation Methodology. I: Overview and Flood Hazard Characterization" 2 (2): 60-71, 2006

      13 Ferreira TM, "Earthquake Risk Mitigation: The Impact of Seismic Retrofitting Strategies on Urban Resilience" 20 (20): 291-304, 2016

      14 Korea Meteorological Administration, "Earthquake Notification - 2016. 9.12 20:37. Official notice"

      15 National Emergency Management Agency, "Development of seismic fragility function for buildings in Korea" 2009

      16 Architectural institute of Korea, "CODE, Korea Building"

      17 Frigerio I, "A GIS-based Approach to Identify the Spatial Variability of Social Vulnerability to Seismic Hazard in Italy" 74 : 12-22, 2016

      18 Bruneau M, "A Framework to Quantitatively Assess and Enhance the Seismic Resilience of Communities" 19 (19): 733-752, 2003

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2002-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.48 0.48 0.44
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.39 0.35 0.664 0.17
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼