RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      식품산업체가 겪는 위기의 분류와 위기 수준 판단 = Classification of Food Safety Crises and Standard Setting for Crisis Level in Food Industry

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103754748

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Objectives: Food safety has become one of the major public-concerning issues in Korea. In order to set guidelines to create manuals for the response to a food safety crisis by food industry, this paper classified food safety crises and suggested techn...

      Objectives: Food safety has become one of the major public-concerning issues in Korea. In order to set guidelines to create manuals for the response to a food safety crisis by food industry, this paper classified food safety crises and suggested techniques to determine crisis level. Methods: This study clarified common terminologies and definitions including in food safety crises. It reviewed various food safety crises and described characteristics, types, and states of crises. Results: The results of this study suggested that a food safety crisis implied a situation in which hazards/risk spreading in the food supply chain was widely described, causing strong public concern followed by a socioeconomic impact, and therefore, requiring the implementation of a prompt and full response regarding the situation. In terms of seeking response plans, food safety crises might be classified according to the penalties resulting from violations of laws and regulations, causative substances, stages of the food supply chain, and first contact point for incidents. The crisis level for a food safety crisis could be classified according to its severity parameters. The guideline matrix was divided into four major stages: Blue/guarded, Yellow/elevated, Orange/high, and Red/severe. This study also suggested several methods for determining the crisis level, such as the simple judgement method, scoring methods using a check-list and a weighted check-list. Conclusion: The severity of related parameters might be of great importance in understanding a crisis and determining response options/challenges for crisis levels.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Korea Food and Drug Administration, KFDA Press 2011

      2 손영수, "의학분야에서의 국가위기관리에 대한 논의" 위기관리 이론과 실천 1 (1): 64-84, 2005

      3 최진혁, "기업 위기관리(Crisis Management) 전략에 관한 연구 -해외 Pandemic Planning 사례를 중심으로-" 한국기업경영학회 17 (17): 149-169, 2010

      4 "Radio Free Asia"

      5 Kim JG, "KFDA Guidelines for supporting empowerment of crisis management in food industry" KFDA Press 2012

      6 Poal P., "Introduction to the theory and practice of crisis intervention" 10 : 121-140, 1990

      7 Korea Food Industry Association, "Food incident response manual in food industry"

      8 Seoul Metropolitan Government, "Food incident response manual" Seoul Metropolitan Government 2011

      9 Korea Food and Drug Administration, "Food Incident Response manual" KFDA Press 2011

      10 Kim R., "Dongsuh under fire for reusing contaminated cereal" Korea Times

      1 Korea Food and Drug Administration, KFDA Press 2011

      2 손영수, "의학분야에서의 국가위기관리에 대한 논의" 위기관리 이론과 실천 1 (1): 64-84, 2005

      3 최진혁, "기업 위기관리(Crisis Management) 전략에 관한 연구 -해외 Pandemic Planning 사례를 중심으로-" 한국기업경영학회 17 (17): 149-169, 2010

      4 "Radio Free Asia"

      5 Kim JG, "KFDA Guidelines for supporting empowerment of crisis management in food industry" KFDA Press 2012

      6 Poal P., "Introduction to the theory and practice of crisis intervention" 10 : 121-140, 1990

      7 Korea Food Industry Association, "Food incident response manual in food industry"

      8 Seoul Metropolitan Government, "Food incident response manual" Seoul Metropolitan Government 2011

      9 Korea Food and Drug Administration, "Food Incident Response manual" KFDA Press 2011

      10 Kim R., "Dongsuh under fire for reusing contaminated cereal" Korea Times

      11 Kim R., "Crown knowingly sold foul snacks" Korea Times

      12 Fink S., "Crisis Management Expert and Author"

      13 KFDA., "Center for reports of adulterated & unsanitary food"

      14 Lee YS, "Analysis of future trends Perspective in foodindustry. Korea Agro-Fisheries & Food Trade Corporation" aT 2012

      15 Kim JG, "An analysis on the violation of standards and specifications under food inspection scheme of Korea" 36 (36): 73-81, 2013

      16 Korea Agro-Fisheries & Food Trade Corporation, "2012 Food industry index of Korea" aT 2013

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2017-01-01 평가 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-02-15 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Korean Journal of Environmental Health -> JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-09-13 학술지등록 한글명 : 한국환경보건학회지
      외국어명 : Korean Journal Of Environmental Health
      KCI등재
      2005-06-02 학술지등록 한글명 : 한국환경보건학회지
      외국어명 : Korean Journal of Environmental Health
      KCI등재
      2005-01-27 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국환경위생학회 -> 한국환경보건학회
      영문명 : Korean Society Of Environmental Health -> Korean Society of Environmental Health
      KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      1999-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.44 0.44 0.4
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.42 0.4 0.605 0.21
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼