천재를 부여 받은 자와 천재를 부여 받지 못한 자의 차이는 무엇인가? = What's the difference between the man of genius and the common?

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This paper aims to define the difference between the man of genius and the common in Kant’s Kritik der Urteilskrqft. We usually call someone genius in history. That means he has genius, a talent of something. So strictly spe따cing， in terms of genius as a talent, he can not be identified with genius because genius is what he has. In Kritik der Urteilskrl빼 S46 Kant defmes genius as a talent for gi꺼ng rules in technic of Arts. But in S47. He seems to consider genius as a 야:rson. In addition, Kant says that because genius is fundamentally different from what is science, genius does not belong to the domain of science. Thus it cannot be learned though it is an universal capacity, understanding and ímagìnation. Here, we can find a discrepancy in the definitions of genius. How do we understand the two different definitions in consistency. What is the implication of the capacity not to be leamed. Noting the discrepancy, this study will show that Kant ’ s genius is a universal capacity, not a special talent someone has. It also shows that talent ’gemus’ comes from the proportion of capacity of mind. That m않ns a person ’gemus’ is who follow the proportion of mind.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 칸트, "판단력 비판" 책세상 2005

2 D. W. 크로포드, "칸트미학이론" 서광사 1995

3 김광명, "칸트 판단력 비판 연구" 철학과 현실사 2006

4 칸트, "실용적 관점에서 본 인간학" 울산대학교 출판부 1998

5 뤽 페리, "미학적 인간" 고려원 1994

6 W. 타타르키비츠, "미학의 기본 개념사" 미술문화 1999

7 E. 카시러, "계몽주의 철학" 민음사 1995

8 Immanuel Kant, "Kritik der Urteilskraft" Felix Meiner Verlag 2009

9 H. W. Cassirer, "A Commentary on Kant's Critique of Judgment" Methuen 1938