RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS SCIE

      투명 신세포암의 핵 분화도 예측 인자로서 전산화단층촬영의 유용성 = Effectiveness of Computed Tomography for Predicting the Nuclear Grade of Renal Cell Carcinoma

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104591934

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Purpose: Nuclear grade is one of the independent prognostic factors for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We investigated the effectiveness of a preoperative CT scan for predicting the nuclear grade of clear cell RCC. Materials and Methods: We retrospective...

      Purpose: Nuclear grade is one of the independent prognostic factors for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We investigated the effectiveness of a preoperative CT scan for predicting the nuclear grade of clear cell RCC.
      Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent surgery for renal lesions between January 2002 and December 2007. We analyzed the pathologic and radiologic reports of 65 patients who underwent radical nephrectomy for RCC and were diagnosed with clear cell RCC. The Hounsfield unit (HU) of the area with maximum enhancement (M) and the total area of the RCC (T) were measured during CT. Ratio values by nuclear grade were calculated by using formulas (M HU/aorta HU, T HU/aorta HU) to eliminate differences between individuals.
      Results: A total of 65 cases of clear cell RCCs were classified according to Fuhrman nuclear grade. Five cases were grade I, 33 were grade II, 15 were grade III, and 12 were grade IV. There was a significant difference in CT enhancement between each nuclear grade, and lower nuclear grades tended to have an increased ratio of maximum enhancement (p=0.020). Fuhrman nuclear grade was divided into two groups: low (Fuhrman grades I, II) and high (Fuhrman grades III, IV). The ratio of enhancement for the M area was significantly higher in the low Fuhrman nuclear grade group than in the high group (p=0.033).
      Conclusions: CT enhancement is inversely related to the nuclear grade of clear cell RCC. This study found that measuring the area of maximum enhancement in CT may be a useful method for presuming the pathologic nuclear grade of RCC, especially when the Fuhrman nuclear grade is divided into low and high groups.

      더보기

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Purpose: Nuclear grade is one of the independent prognostic factors for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We investigated the effectiveness of a preoperative CT scan for predicting the nuclear grade of clear cell RCC. Materials and Methods: We retrospectiv...

      Purpose: Nuclear grade is one of the independent prognostic factors for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We investigated the effectiveness of a preoperative CT scan for predicting the nuclear grade of clear cell RCC.
      Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent surgery for renal lesions between January 2002 and December 2007. We analyzed the pathologic and radiologic reports of 65 patients who underwent radical nephrectomy for RCC and were diagnosed with clear cell RCC. The Hounsfield unit (HU) of the area with maximum enhancement (M) and the total area of the RCC (T) were measured during CT. Ratio values by nuclear grade were calculated by using formulas (M HU/aorta HU, T HU/aorta HU) to eliminate differences between individuals.
      Results: A total of 65 cases of clear cell RCCs were classified according to Fuhrman nuclear grade. Five cases were grade I, 33 were grade II, 15 were grade III, and 12 were grade IV. There was a significant difference in CT enhancement between each nuclear grade, and lower nuclear grades tended to have an increased ratio of maximum enhancement (p=0.020). Fuhrman nuclear grade was divided into two groups: low (Fuhrman grades I, II) and high (Fuhrman grades III, IV). The ratio of enhancement for the M area was significantly higher in the low Fuhrman nuclear grade group than in the high group (p=0.033).
      Conclusions: CT enhancement is inversely related to the nuclear grade of clear cell RCC. This study found that measuring the area of maximum enhancement in CT may be a useful method for presuming the pathologic nuclear grade of RCC, especially when the Fuhrman nuclear grade is divided into low and high groups.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김세웅, "신세포암의 예후인자" 대한비뇨기과학회 43 (43): 98-105, 2002

      2 김공조, "신세포암에서 예후인자로서의 혈소판증가증" 대한비뇨기과학회 48 (48): 1099-1103, 2007

      3 Jamis-Dow CA, "Small (< or = 3-cm) renal masses: detection with CT versus US and pathologic correlation" 197 : 785-788, 1996

      4 Folkmn J, "Seminars in Medicine of the Beth Israel Hospital, Boston. Clinical applications of research on angiogenesis" 333 : 1757-1763, 1995

      5 Campbell SC, "Renal tumor. In: Campbell-Walsh urology. 9th ed" 1603-1607, 2006

      6 Medeiros LJ, "Renal cell carcinoma. Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in 121 cases" 61 : 1639-1651, 1988

      7 Boxer RJ, "Renal carcinoma: computer analysis of 96 patients treated by nephrectomy" 122 : 598-601, 1979

      8 Ljungberg B, "Radical nephrectomy is still preferable in the treatment of localized renal cell carcinoma. A long-term follow-up study" 33 : 79-85, 1998

      9 Köhler HH, "Quantitative assessment of vascular surface density in renal cell carcinomas" 77 : 650-654, 1996

      10 Fuhrman SA, "Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinoma" 6 : 655-663, 1982

      1 김세웅, "신세포암의 예후인자" 대한비뇨기과학회 43 (43): 98-105, 2002

      2 김공조, "신세포암에서 예후인자로서의 혈소판증가증" 대한비뇨기과학회 48 (48): 1099-1103, 2007

      3 Jamis-Dow CA, "Small (< or = 3-cm) renal masses: detection with CT versus US and pathologic correlation" 197 : 785-788, 1996

      4 Folkmn J, "Seminars in Medicine of the Beth Israel Hospital, Boston. Clinical applications of research on angiogenesis" 333 : 1757-1763, 1995

      5 Campbell SC, "Renal tumor. In: Campbell-Walsh urology. 9th ed" 1603-1607, 2006

      6 Medeiros LJ, "Renal cell carcinoma. Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in 121 cases" 61 : 1639-1651, 1988

      7 Boxer RJ, "Renal carcinoma: computer analysis of 96 patients treated by nephrectomy" 122 : 598-601, 1979

      8 Ljungberg B, "Radical nephrectomy is still preferable in the treatment of localized renal cell carcinoma. A long-term follow-up study" 33 : 79-85, 1998

      9 Köhler HH, "Quantitative assessment of vascular surface density in renal cell carcinomas" 77 : 650-654, 1996

      10 Fuhrman SA, "Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinoma" 6 : 655-663, 1982

      11 Delahunt B, "Prognostic significance of microscopic vascularity for clear cell renal cell carcinoma" 80 : 401-404, 1997

      12 Minardi D, "Prognostic role of Fuhrman grade and vascular endothelial growth factor in pT1a clear cell carcinoma in partial nephrectomy specimens" 174 : 1208-1212, 2005

      13 Tsui KH, "Prognostic indicators for renal cell carcinoma: a multivariate analysis of 643 patients using the revised 1997 TNM staging criteria" 163 : 1090-1095, 2000

      14 Mejean A, "Prognostic factors of renal cell carcinoma" 169 : 821-827, 2003

      15 Villalobos-Gollas M, "Nuclear grade prediction of renal cell carcinoma using contrasted computed tomography" 181 : 249-, 2009

      16 Peters W, "Microcirculatory studies in rat mammary carcinoma. I. Transparent chamber method, development of microvasculature, and pressures in tumor vessels" 65 : 631-642, 1980

      17 Jinzaki M, "Double-phase helical CT of small renal parenchymal neoplasms: correlation with pathologic findings and tumor angiogenesis" 24 : 835-842, 2000

      18 Ruppert-Kohlmayr AJ, "Differentiation of renal clear cell carcinoma and renal papillary carcinoma using quantitative CT enhancement parameters" 183 : 1387-1391, 2004

      19 Skinner DG, "Diagnosis and management of renal cell carcinoma. A clinical and pathologic study of 309 cases" 28 : 1165-1177, 1971

      20 Cheville JC, "Comparisons of outcome and prognostic features among histologic subtypes of renal cell carcinoma" 27 : 612-624, 2003

      21 Chang SG, "Clinical significance of urinary vascular endothelial factor and microvessel density in patients with renal cell carcinoma" 58 : 904-908, 2001

      22 Rhew HY, "Clinical characteristics of incidentally detected renal cell carcinoma: incidentaloma" 41 : 1195-1201, 2000

      23 Seong BM, "Clinical characteristics of incidentally detected renal cell carcinoma" 38 : 245-249, 1997

      24 Lee HW, "Clinical analysis of incidentally found renal cell carcinoma: experiences of recent 8 years" 39 : 982-987, 1998

      25 Boring CC, "Cancer statistics, 1993" 43 : 7-26, 1993

      26 Folkman J, "A heparin-binding angiogenic protein-basic fibroblast growth factor-is stored within basement membrane" 130 : 393-400, 1998

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2019-03-12 학회명변경 한글명 : 대한비뇨기과학회 -> 대한비뇨의학회 KCI등재
      2016-03-04 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Investigative and Clinical Urology KCI등재
      2016-01-15 학술지명변경 한글명 : Korean Journal of Urology -> Investigative and Clinical Urology KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-02-21 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한비뇨기과학회지 -> Korean Journal of Urology
      외국어명 : The Korean Journal of Urology -> 미등록
      KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2002-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.14 0.14 0.13
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.13 0.12 0.314 0.23
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼