은유적 보조동사의 구문과 의미 = The Meaning and Construction of Metaphorical Dependent Verbs

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study is intended to explain the meaning of metaphoric dependent verbs which is supposed to participate in some kind of Construction with its own semantic interpretation rule. The meaning of dependent verbs can be explained by revised meaning-network theory of Tyler & Evans(2004), which registers new meanings by experiential co- relation mechanism of human cognition. The meaning-network theory of Tyler & Evans(2004) which has been revised here suggests that dependent verbs are only allowed to activate minimal extended meanings, and the meaning and constraints of dependent verbs in Korean seem to be properly explained by this phenomenon and Construction Grammar's non- derivational surface form hypothesis(Goldberg 2006). When metaphorical mapping takes place in dependent verb's constructions, those two domains of time and state become grounds where TRs can move through figuratively. But, for the meaning of verbs does not go under change, they sustain activating their minimal -extended meaning throughout all contexts, so that we can make every meanings of dependent verbs be predictable with reference to the proto-scenes where every co-related experiences have originated from. 정병철소속: 경북대학교 박사과정주소: 대구 광역시 동구 봉무동 청구 새들마을 아파트 103동 506호전화: 053-982-1093전자우편: [e-mail]

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 고영진, "한국어의 문법화 과정" 국학자료원 71-101, 1997

2 서정수, "한-일 양국어 보조용언의 비교 연구 한국겨레문화연구원" 15-4 16, 1990

3 정병철, "지각동사 보다의 의미망" 언어학회 28 : 23-42, 2006b

4 박선옥, "외국어로서 한국어 보조동사 가다와 오다의 교육" 23 : 161-186, 2004

5 이성하, "문법화의 이해" 230-289, 2000

6 정병철, "맥락과 잠재적 환유 의미의 활성화" 한국사회언어학회 담화인지언어학회 57-67, 2006a

7 이기동, "동사 가다의 의미" 한글 학회 247 : 133-158, 2000

8 손세모돌, "국어 보조용언 연구" 127-148, 1996

9 민현식, "국어 문법 연구" 역락 119-155, 1999

10 김기혁, "국어 문법 연구" 도서출판 박이정 437-441, 1995

11 이종열, "가다의 다의성에 대한 인지의미론적 연구" 한국어의미학회 3 : 97-118, 1998

12 이기동, "‘가다’의 의미 분석" 120-154, 1977

13 Michaelis, "Toward a construction- based theory of language functions: the case of nominal extraposition" 72 : 215-247, 1996

14 Chomsky, "The minimalist program" Cambridge, Mass.:MIT Press 235-236, 1995

15 G, "The University of Chicago Press" 25-32, 1980

16 Tyler, "The Semantics of English Prepositions: Spatial Scenes Embodied Meaning and Cognition" Cambridge University Press 50-54, 2004

17 "The Meaning and Construction of Metaphorical Dependent VerbsJeong"

18 Langacker, R. W, "The Cognitive Basis of Grammar" Mouton de Gruyter 78-81, 2002

19 Herskovits, "Spatial Expressions and the Plasticity of Meaning. Topics in Cognitive Linguistics ed. by Rudzka-Ostyn" John Benjamins Publishing Company. 271- 297. 1988

20 Croft, "Radical construction grammar: syntactic theory in typological perspective" Oxford: Oxford University Press 18-28, 2001

21 Lakoff, G, "Philosophy in the Flesh" A Member of the Perseus Books Group 170-234, 1999

22 Traugott, "On the rise of epistemic meanings in English an example of subjectification in semantic change. Language" 31-55, 1989

23 Sweetser, "From Etymology to Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press" 1990

24 Goldberg, "Constructions: a construction grammar approach to argument structure" Chicago: University of Chicago Press 9-16, 1995

25 Goldberg, "Constructions at Work: The nature of generalization in language" Oxford University Press 19-44, 2006

26 Noam, "A minimalist program for linguistic theory. The view from Building 20" MIT Press 1-52, 1993