재난 발생 시 사회복지 분야의 역할: 생태체계이론의 외체계를 중심으로

최지경,변규리,김상임 충남대학교 사회과학연구소 2020 사회과학연구 Vol.31 No.3

Infectious diseases such as COVID-19 and MERS-CoV have been declared as an “International Public Health Emergency (PHEIC)” and demand an international response and multi-dimensional approach. The role of the social welfare sector in disasters as well as changes in social structure in terms of the ecological system and political and social conditions should be taken into account. This study presents unique and professional improvement opportunities in the social welfare area by supplementing the limitations of prior studies that mainly dealt with the importance of intervention in the mental health sector. To this end, we examined the roles of and interventions in the social welfare sector, focusing on exosystem among ecological system theories, by dividing them into material and social resources. The suggestions required for social welfare interventions and roles are as follows. First, a professional and systematic management system within social welfare shall be established to coordination of opinion with the government in disaster and to coordinate various service interventions and roles in the field of social welfare. By unifying the delivery system that can be confusing, support and work coordination for organizations in the social welfare sector can be efficiently made, and external resources can be effectively linked. Second, a budget should be secured for the social welfare sector by defining the burden on state and local governments as a whole. Third, education, training, and support play necessary roles in social welfare during disasters. South Korea delivers on-site services through local government officials, not disaster experts, during disasters, and private experts in the social welfare sector do not play a role. Fourth, research and promotion should be carried out. Revitalizing research in the social welfare sector during disasters is of paramount importance. Activities such as hosting academic conferences, expanding academic exchanges with overseas scholars, expanding research opportunities, and publishing case studies and books can enhance response capabilities during global disaster situations such as coronavirus.

사회복지의 사회복지 1.

장정연 ( Chang Jungyeon ) 극동대학교 사회복지연구소 2016 글로벌사회복지연구 Vol.6 No.2

이 글은 연구자가 그동안 읽고 반성하고 실험하고 문제제기를 통해 만난 여러 학자들과의 마주침 속에서 `사회복지의 사회복지`를 하나의 수수께끼로서 풀어나가 보고자 하였다. 그 마주침은 다양한 방향과 다양한 경로, 그리고 다양한 질문 던지기 속에서 변경과 차이가 된 사회복지를 그려보고, 더 나아가 하나의 가능성의 조건으로서의 사회복지의 세계를 열어보는 일이다. 연구자가 글을 쓴다는 것은 `본다`는 것의 문제이고 `본다`는 것은 지식과 가치 그리고 실천의 원천이 되기 때문에 사회복지를 어떻게 볼 것인지에 대한 문제는 `사회복지의 사회복지`란 무엇인가라는 질문 방식의 확장으로서 시공간적 역동들을 함께 발견하는 것과 관련된다. 다양한 방식으로 연구에서 수행된 마주침의 결과 `사회복지의 사회복지`는 여전히 문제적이고도 미완성된 채로 열려 있었으며, 공간화 된 시간 속의 다양한 층위에서 여러 방식과 무반성적으로 현실과 대결하고 있었다. `사회복지의 사회복지`라는 시공간적 연구는 사회복지의 새로운 실천을 위한 간격이자 이행이고 거리두기로서 하나의 계기이다. `사회복지의 사회복지`를 지속의 역량 속에 위치시키면서 시공간의 차원을 언급한다면 `사회복지의 사회복지`의 이론과 실천 사이의 생명력이 강조될 수 있을 것이며 그 이론과 실천의 차이는 반복이며 반복은 차이라는 것이 사회복지의 실천적 구조의 요소이자가능성의 조건이 될 것이다. `사회복지의 사회복지`라는 새로운 실천을 위한 물음의 마주침은 후속연구에서도 지속적으로 연기(延期)하고 연기(演技)되어 연신(延伸)될 것으로 보인다. 따라서 새로운 `사회복지의 사회복지`의 연구는 다양한 방식으로 다양한 방향에서 생산되고 재생산되어져야 할 것이다. In this paper, I tried to solve the social welfare of social welfare as a mystery in the encounter with the scholars who have read, reflected, experimented and raised questions. The encounter is to draw social welfare that changes and differences in various directions, various paths, and various question casts, and to open the world of social welfare as a condition of one possibility. The question of what the researcher writes is a matter of "seeing" and "seeing" is the source of knowledge, value and practice, so the question of how to view social welfare is the question of what is "social welfare of social welfare" As well as finding temporal dynamics together. The social welfare of social welfare was still open to problematic and incomplete as a result of the encountered researches in various ways, and confronted reality in various ways and unresponsively on various levels in spatialized time. Spatiotemporal research called `social welfare of social welfare` is an interval and fulfillment for new practice of social welfare and it is an opportunity as distance. If we refer to the dimension of time and space while placing `social welfare of social welfare` in the capacity of sustainability, the vitality between the theory and practice of `social welfare of social welfare` can be emphasized. The difference is the element of the practical structure of social welfare and the condition of possibility. The meeting of the question for a new practice of `social welfare of social welfare` seems to be extended (postponed) and acted (extended) continuously in subsequent research. Therefore, the study of new `social welfare of social welfare` should be produced and reproduced in various ways in various ways.

연구논문 : 한국 종교계 사회복지의 쟁점과 과제

고병철 ( Byoung Chul Ko ) 한국종교문화연구소 2011 종교문화비평 Vol.19 No.19

The purpose of this article is to draw issues and tasks of social welfare in Korean religions. I think this article analyzing the history of social welfare policy, private sectors in social welfare, and religious social welfare is the beginning of a recondite preoccupation of academics about social welfare in Korean religions. To achieve these purposes, in chapter 2, in the title of ``the history of social welfare policy and private sectors in social welfare,`` I analyzed the history of social welfare policy in Korea. And I argued that private organizations including Korean religions were enlisted as helpers by South Korean governments. In chapter 3, ``private sectors in social welfare and social welfare in religions,`` I examined the contents of private sectors in social welfare. And I argued that social welfare in religions has become the heart of private sectors in social welfare. And, in chapter 4, in the title of ``issues and tasks of social welfare in religions,`` I suggested three issues and tasks of social welfare in Korean religions. Its` contents were in concepts building of social welfare or religious social welfare, the end of social welfare in religions, and the government support to social welfare facilities in Korean religions.

사회복지행정 교재의 검토와 교육의 방향

박경일 한국사회복지교육협의회 2008 한국사회복지교육 Vol.4 No.1

This study focused on the proposal for the improvement of textbook contents and a better directions of education in social welfare administration. This article analyzed textbooks on social welfare administration and a subject guideline on social welfare administration in social welfare curriculum. According to this study results, I founded that the books on social welfare administration are increased in comparison to reforming of social welfare laws and growing in students of the department of social welfare. Especially, many textbooks on social welfare administration have been published to prepare a qualifying examination of the first degree social worker after 2000. In conclusion, the Implications for future directions of education on social welfare administration call for new approaches to developing learning materials and textbook contents. These include: publishing of the textbook or casebook related to the blance between knowledge and skills, writing of human service management, developing of the techniques and skills of human service management, publishing many translation on social welfare administration. 본 연구는 2005년 현재까지 출간된 사회복지행정 관련 저서들의 시기별 특성과 사회복지행정 교재와 교과목 지침서의 구성과 내용을 검토 분석하여 사회복지 행정교육의 방향과 교재의 질적 향상을 제언하는데 있다. 검토 결과 사회복지행정 교재는 사회복지관계 법령의 변화와 사회복지학과 및 학생 수가 증대함에 따라 비례하여 관련 저서들의 출간이 증대되었음을 알 수 있었고 특히 사회복지사 1급시험이 실시되는 2000년 이후부터 행정 교재의 집필이 활발하게 이루어졌음을 알 수 있었다. 아울러 사회복지행정 교재와 지침서에 수록된 내용과 구성이 실제 사회복지 현장에서 직접적으로 활용되어질 수 있는 행정 기술과의 연계성이 부족하다는 것도 알 수 있었다. 따라서 연구자는 사회복지행정의 질적 향상을 위한 교육의 방향과 교재의 개발로서 이론과 실천현장이 연계된 사회복지행정의 교육과 교재 출간, 사회복지(서비스)관리론에 대한 저서 집필, 사회복지실천 현장에 적합한 서비스 관리기법의 개발과 적용, 대학원에 복지매니져먼트 전공 개설, 사회복지사 재교육의 강화, 그리고 사회복지행정 번역서의 출간과 지원 등을 제언하였다.

몽골 사회복지 현황과 과제: 한국 사회복지와 비교를 중심으로

최칠성(Choi ChilSung),다와수랭(Davaasuren Logshir) 한국비영리학회 2016 한국비영리연구 Vol.15 No.1

본 연구는 몽골의 사회복지 현황에 대하여 고찰하고 한국의 사회복지와 비교를 통한 몽골 사회복지에 함의 점을 제공하는 것을 목적으로 하고 있다. 이를 위해 먼저 몽골의 문헌과 한국의 문헌을 통하여 사회복지정책에 대한 전반적인 검토를 시행하였다. 그리고 주요한 정책 및 서비스에 대해 한국의 사회복지와 비교연구를 통하여 몽골 사회복지에 향후 발전 방향을 다음과 같이 제시하였다. 첫째, 사회복지 발전을 위해 사회복지 재원 확충이 필요하다. 둘째, 사회보험 분야에서 노 령인구를 대비한 국민연금의 개선과 요양보험 도입 등의 검토가 필요함을 제시하였다. 셋 째, 사회복지 서비스 전달방식의 개선과 사회서비스 제공방식에 바우처 방식의 도입을 제언하였다. 또한 장기적으로 전자바우처 제도 및 사회복지의 전반적인 발전을 위해 IT System에 대한 인프라 구축이 필요함을 제언하였다. 넷째, 사회복지 서비스를 전달하는 가장 중요한 요소인 전문적인 사회복지사의 육성이 필요함을 제언하였다. 이를 위하여 교육기관의 설립과 양성이 필요하며, 다양한 사회복지사를 배출하기 위한 프로그램의 시행이 필요함을 제시하였다. The purpose of this study was to suggest social welfare challenge in Mongolia by analyzed the current situation of Mongolia social welfare comparison with social welfare in Korea. For this purpose, we performed literature review for social welfare policy in Mongolia and Korea. Furthermore, through the comparison study with Korea regarding main welfare policies and services, future development direction of social welfare in Mongolia was suggested as following. First, it is necessary for increase of social welfare budget to social welfare progress. Second, in the field of social insurance, the necessity for considering improvement of National Pension and introduction of Care Insurance for the Elderly was suggested. Third, we suggested improving of an delivery system and introducing voucher system. And, in the long term, we proposed necessity for introducing electric voucher system as well as constructing IT system infrastructure aiming at overall advancement of social welfare. Fourth, necessity for training specialized social welfare worker, which is the most important role player in conducting social welfare service, was suggested as well. In this regard, necessity for establishing and fostering training institution as well as implementing the program producing various social welfare workers was suggested.

원불교와 사회복지

서윤(Yoon Seo) 전남대학교 종교문화연구소 2007 종교문화학보 Vol.4 No.-

원불교의 개교 동기는 파란 고해의 일체 생령을 광대무량한 낙원으로 인도하고자 함이다. 광대무량한 낙원은 현대사회가 추구하는 복지사회를 말한다고 할 수 있다. 또 원불교는 ‘교화, 교육, 자선’을 3대 사업 목표로 하고 있는데, 자선의 현대적 개념은 사회복지로, 원불교에서는 사회복지를 3대 실천사업 목표의 하나로 설정하여 일찍부터 실현시켜오고 있다. 이렇듯 원불교는 개교 자체가 사회복지적인 차원에서 이루어졌으며, 개교 이래 지금까지 사회복지활동을 활발히 전개해오고 있다. 본 논문은 원불교 사회복지의 근간이 되는 원불교 사회복지 이념과 사회복지관을 주요 교리에 바탕하여 살펴보고, 이념을 구현하는 사회복지활동을 원불교 사회복지의 역사와 현황을 통해 살펴보았다. 그 주요 내용은 다음과 같다. 원불교의 사회복지 이념은 개교의 동기, 일원상 진리, 사은, 삼학, 사요에 근거하여 찾아보았다. 개교의 동기는 원불교 사회복지의 궁극적인 목표를 제시하고 있고, 일원상 진리와 사은은 원불교의 이념적 사회복지 이념, 삼학과 사요는 실천적 사회복지 이념이라고 할 수 있다. 원불교 사회복지관은 일원주의, 평등주의, 상생주의, 자력주의, 봉공주의를 제시하였다. 원불교 사회복지의 역사는 광복 직후의 전재동포 구호활동으로부터 출발하였고, 1970년대까지는 요보호노인과 아동을 대상으로 양로시설과 아동양육시설(고아원)을 중심으로 한 시설보호형태의 사업을 주로 전개하였다. 1980년대부터 대상과 서비스 유형이 다양화하기 시작하여 종전의 노인과 아동 중심의 시설보호사업에서 장애인, 정신보건사회사업, 상담 분야로 확대하여 많은 다양한 대상을 위한 사회복지사업을 전개하였다. 현재 13개 사회복지법인과 170개소의 사회복지기관 및 시설이 설치ㆍ운영되고 있다. 원불교 사회복지사업은 총괄 부서인 교정원 공익복지부에 의해 중앙관리체제로 운영되고 있다. 교단 내적으로 원불교 교역자를 위한 사회복지제도는 요양ㆍ휴양ㆍ정양과 정년퇴임 이후의 노후정양에 대한 보장으로 이루어지고 있다. 향후 원불교 사회복지사업의 발전을 위한 과제로는, 첫째, 사회복지사업주체의 다양화와 저변 확대, 둘째, 사회복지사업의 운영책임자를 출가 교역자 중심에서 재가교도로 확대, 셋째, 사회복지사업의 지역 격차 해소를 제시하였다. The Founding Motive of the Teaching of Won Buddhism is to lead all sentient beings, who are drowning in the sea of suffering, to a vast and immeasurable paradise which can be welfare society modern society want to pursue. The Three Work Objects of Won Buddhism are Enlightenment, Education, and Charity. Charity of them in a general idea of modern society is the Social Welfare which is one of three practical work objects of Won Buddhism and is been taking to become welfare and benefit for people. Like this, as founding motive of teaching of Won Buddhism, itself comes from for social welfare and from founding to now it has been practicing for people actively. This thesis is studied in the ideology and a view of social welfare of Won Buddhism based of it and activity of Won Buddhism social welfare embodying it's ideology through with the history and present state of it. The main contents are like following detail. Ideology of Won Buddhism social welfare is searched by based on The Founding Motive of the Teaching, The Truth of Il-Won-Sang, The Fourfold Grace, The Four Essential, and The Threefold Study. The Founding Motive of the Teaching can be indicated a final object of Won Buddhism social welfare, The Truth of Il-Won-Sang and The Fourfold Grace can be indicated the ideology of ideological Won Buddhism social welfare, and The Four Essential and The Threefold Study can be indicated the ideology of practical Won Buddhism social welfare. A view of Won Buddhism social welfare shows the principle of Il-won, the principle of equality, the principle of compatibility, the principle of self-power, and the principle of public service. History of Won Buddhism social welfare has started right after Korean independence with from working the Relief work for War refugees , from in 1970 mainly worked kinds of asylums for the old ages and orphans, and as a lot of changing social members and services, from in 1980 worked and extended to care of the handicapped and the health mental problem, and counsel and serve more different social welfare services. So presently 13 judical corporations of social welfare and 170 organizations and facilities of social welfare are well been establishing and operating by center control system of The Dept. of public welfare of Won Buddhism H.P. Internal systems of social welfare of Won Buddhism for Won Buddhist priests are accomplished of serving for recuperation, recreation, convalesce and retire rest. For future, questions of Won Buddhism social welfare will be developed are the first is the diversification of the main body of the work of social welfare and the low-est stratum extended, the second is extending a responsible manager of the work of social welfare from the Won Buddhist priest to the Won Buddhist home priest, and the third is recommending a answer of the regional disparity of the work of social welfare.

러시아 사회통합정책의 민낯, 목표와 적용의 괴리 : 사회복지 관련 근로자에 대한 러시아 정부의 시야를 중심으로

전병국,양호정 한국러시아문학회 2022 러시아어문학 연구논집 Vol.77 No.-

This study started from the question ‘Could Russian government keep the fundamental purpose that the social welfare policy should have at least in the age of transformation that was regarded as one of the worst economic situations in Russia?’. This study also focused on the stance of Russian government towards social welfare-related workers among diverse crossroads. The situations of the times required a more firm social welfare system and more professionalized social welfare workers. At that time, social welfare-related workers were warriors to fight in the front lie of Russian social welfare field. The purpose of this study is to analyze the stance of Russian government towards social welfare-related workers in the age of transportation and classification of related policies and fundamentally understand Russian government’s real intention towards the weak. During the regime transition, Russian government cut down on finances of social welfare system and even reduced or privatized social welfare facilities that protected the social weak, under the pretext of efficient distribution of national finances. Undoubtedly, the pain of the social weak was aggravated in this process. What was the stance of Russian government towards social welfare-related workers, who played a role as the last rescue line for the social weak, this time? This study demonstrates that Russian government was indifferent to, or intentionally neglected social welfare workers. This indifference or intentional negligence of Russian government towards social welfare-related workers led to a low-quality social welfare service and ultimately played a decisive role in increasing the difficulty of the social weak. According to the Titmuss social welfare model theory, the stance of Russian government towards social welfare-related workers in the age of transformation can be classified into a residual type. Considering the tough situation that the social weak faced at that time, also, it is hard to say that this stance of Russian government was a good choice, from the perspective of social welfare.

사회복지법의 개념과 법체계의 개선방안

이중호 동아대학교 법학연구소 2015 東亞法學 Vol.- No.68

This paper is of the concept of social welfare and system of legal on the social welfare. Here is examining difference of the concept of social welfare On the side social welfare science and jurisprudence. the concept of seeing any difference, and the difference is that where is occurring, and what legal basis, a system of social law how it was at the Look. Naw days, Service practice cases is tend to put too much emphasis in the areas of Social Welfare. No matter how good the services of social, services are also service subject and demander passed they are made through trail and error. Consequence, the time and cost of importing waste. Social welfare policies, no matter how good the law can take effect without the constitutional Artical 10 to Joe because Joe Artical 34 of essential social welfare and social welfare laws so we can confirm the importance of law and Social Security Business Act. However, the ideological premise of social welfare-related ideas and concepts mentioned at fault ‘as a means of social welfare gwangui’. In other words, learn about the social security system and welfare scholars have classified the scheme would also briefly mentioned. The actual circumstance of studies on the legislation system of social welfare in korea is insufficient, so the more research efforts are required for systematization of social welfare laws. The social welfare law is defined in this study as every laws that insure the human life within social relations and rule the public, and private systems & politics etc. for realizing social justice. and this study suggested the legislation system of social welfare in korea divided into the social security act and the laws in connection with social welfare appling the concept in broad sense. It included in the social security act, general social security(2), social insurance(10), public assistance(6), social welfare service(21) laws and included in other laws in connection with social welfare, the laws(151) that legislated for insuring the human life of constitutional law trying to categorize by classifying into public health․hygiene, residing․environment, education, employment․labor, traffic, feminine․family, children․adolescent, veteran․compensation, human rights․protection and other general social welfare area. 사회복지법은 학문적․실천적으로 많이 논의되고 있음에도 불구하고 그 이해방법과 범주, 그리고 체계적 특성이 모호한 상태에 있다. 사회복지법은 헌법의 구체화법으로 존재한다. 즉 사회복지법이 정치타협의 대상으로 여겨지는 것은 이제 지양되어야 할 것이다. 또한 사회복지 관련법 전반을 우리 헌법의 기준으로 재설계하고 재구성하여야 할 시점이 아닌 가 사료된다. 기본적 헌법 원리로서 민주국가원리, 법치국가원리, 사회국가원리의 기반 하에 사회복지법제의 체계정립이 다시 이뤄져야할 것으로 본다. 더불어 행정법 체제에 기반 하여 사회복지법의 전반적 검토가 이뤄져야 한다. 특히 법치행정의 원칙 아래서 사회복지법을 검토․분석․비판하는 것은 무엇보다도 시급하다고 사료되며, 결국 사회복지의 수혜자- 이른바 ‘사회복지권자’-의 관점에서 사회복지의 실체적 내용과 절차적 체계에 대한 법제완비가 이뤄져야 할 것으로 본다. 이를 위하여 본 논문에서는 그간 급부행정의 영역이라 해서 다소 관대하게 취급된 법률유보의 원리를 사회복지 입법이나 법률해석에서 보다 적극적으로 적용되어야 함을 기조로 이른바 ‘사회복지권’ 개념의 명확화, ‘사회복지권’ 집행을 위한 절차규범완비 및 법제의 체계․균형․ 합목적성 도모를 개선의 방향으로 제시하였다.

사회복지교육과정 개편방향의 논의와 과제: 사회복지사업법 시행령 및 시행규칙 개정안(案)을 중심으로

정종화,최은라,김제선 한국사회복지교육협의회 2014 한국사회복지교육 Vol.27 No.-

Through the National Assembly’s public hearing, this study based on discussion foryears to suggest the direction of revising the social welfare education curriculum, hasproposed“the Revised Bill of Enforcement Decree and Rule of the Social Welfare ServicesAct”outlining, for example, the reorganization of new curriculum subjects which reflectthe actual condition survey of social welfare education, the current status of socialwelfare education in advanced countries and the timely situation of social welfaresettings. To gather opinions and mediate arguments, the contents of discussion in thepublic hearing passed through the representatives’ conference of the related agencies ororganizations about social welfare education and finally the next following results of thestudy have been recommended. First, the standard of social welfare’s subject completion should be fortified bystrengthening the regulation of finishing the required courses for social welfare education. That is the standard of the social worker’s qualification should be changed from thepresent ‘14 subjects 42 credits’ to 17 subjects 51 credits. To the court required subjects, ‘3subjects 9 credits’which are“Social Work Values and Ethics, and Program DevelopmentAnd Evaluation, and Case Management”are newly added. To the court elective subjects,‘4 subjects 12 credits’which are“Care Work, Cultural Diversity and Social Welfare, andSocial Welfare Management, and Welfare State”are also freshly added. Second, due to the boosting of the regulation of practice completion, the present ‘3credits 120 hours over’ are increased to ‘3 credits 160 hours over’, and main contents such as the improvement of the supervisor criterion in practice agencies, thereinforcement of trainee criterion, having practice agencies become certified agencies, theenhancement of the practice academic advisor by institutions of social welfare educationare stipulated in the revised rule. Third, toughening up the requirement of graduate course completion of social welfare,the present required 6 subjects 18 credits are finally changed to 7 subjects 21 credits. Upcoming problems are the integration of the present social worker’s qualificationsystem classified into 1 to 3 grade, and the plan preparation for the high-level practiceinstruction. Of course, multilateral discussion is needed, for example, 6 subjects 18 creditswhich are the examination subjects for social welfare officials and social workers shouldbe expanded due to the addition of new required subjects written above. In case ofspecial graduate school, the present standard of social welfare major’s taking credits isneed to be discussed. 지난 수년 동안의 논의를 바탕으로 사회복지교육과정의 개편방향을 제시하기 위하여 사회복지교육 실태조사, 선진국의 사회복지교육현황, 사회복지현장의 시대적 상황을 반영한 신규교과목의 개편 등을 골자로“사회복지사업법 시행령 및 시행규칙 개정안”을 국회공청회를통하여 제안하였다. 공청회에서 논의된 내용에 대하여 사회복지교육관련 기관의 대표자 회의를 통하여 의견수렴 및 논의과정을 거쳤으며, 최종적으로 본 연구에서는 다음과 같이 연구결과를 제안하고자 한다. 첫째, 사회복지교육을 위한 필수교과목 이수규정을 강화하여 현행 사회복지사 자격취득최소기준인 14과목 42학점 이수에서 17과목 51학점 이수로 사회복지교과과정 이수 기준의강화를 제안하였다. 법정 필수교과목 확대에서는 3과목 9학점, “사회복지윤리와 철학, 프로그램개발과 평가, 사례관리론”이 추가되었고, 신규 법정 선택교과목으로 4과목 12학점, “복지국가론, 사회복지와 문화적 다양성, 사회복지경영론, 케어사회복지론”이 추가되었다. 둘째, 실습이수규정이 강화되어, 현행 3학점 120시간 이상에서 3학점 160시간 이상으로확대하였으며, 실습기관의 슈퍼바이저 자격기준, 실습생 수의 1인당 지도인원, 실습기관의인증제 도입, 사회복지교육기관의 실습지도 교수기준강화, 실습지도 교수 1인당 수강생 수를 제한하는 내용을 시행규칙에 명문화하였다. 셋째, 대학원 사회복지교과목 이수요건을 강화하여 현행 사회복지 필수이수 요건을 6과목 18학점이었는데 7과목 21학점 필수이수 규정으로 최종 제안하였다. 향후 과제로는 사회복지사 자격이 1~3급으로 구분되어 있는 현행제도의 통합화, 수준 높은 실습 지도를 위한 방안 마련, 사회복지공무원 시험과목 개선, 사회복지사 국가시험과목을현행 6과목 18학점에서 신규 필수과목이 확대됨에 따른 시험과목의 확대 등, 다각적인 논의가 필요하고, 사회복지전공 특수대학원의 경우, 현행 사회복지학 학점이수 수준의 강화에 대한 논의가 추가적으로 필요할 것이다.

북한여성의 사회복지정책연구

김영란 숙명여자대학교 지역학연구소 2001 지역학논집 = Research Institute of Regional Studies Vol.5 No.-

The study is to grope for the unified device of the women's welfare policy in the United Korea by considering the women's welfare in North Korea centering on the women's welfare law and system among the social security laws and systems in the present. The North Korea have enforced women's welfare policies according to the ideologies and constitutions. But in the welfare policy women are in the secondary stage by means of the ideology of sexual devision. It, therefore, is clear that the position of the North Korean women goes in advance of the South Korean women in the law and system. North Korean women are discriminated not only in home and labor participation, but also in social welfare. There are the patriarchal family system and sexual devision of labor under the discrimination against woman. As though the both sexes are equal in law, the welfare law and system are applicated unequally to woman because of the ideology of sexual devision and fanilism which family should take the primary responsibility of welfare. The study suggests as the women's welfare the spread of the application of social welfare system, and social security network constructed through the mother protection policy, women's poverty and social security on basis of the primary principles such as the gender equal right as civil right, benefits of social welfare as social right, escape from the patriarchal familism, strenghtening of resposibility of state and the principle of women participation in process of social welfare management. The device of women's welfare means building the social welfare system based on the real gender equality, so the unification will be important turning point for the gender-equal society to the South-North Korean women