과거력 의무기록 정보의 기재정도 및 일치도 분석

서정숙 ( Jung Sook Seo ),유승흠 ( Seung Hum Yu ),오현주 ( Hyohn Joo Oh ),김용욱 ( Yong Oock Kim ) 한국병원경영학회 2008 병원경영학회지 Vol.13 No.1

This study was conducted to evaluate the quality in medical records by analyzing its completeness through setting up the level of record on the patient`s past history and through examining the actual medial records. Targeting the information on the patient`s past history in interns` records, residents` records and nurses` records toward 403 inpatients who were admitted first in 2004 at an university hospital due to stomach cancer. We analyzed whether the charts were recorded or not, recording level, the satisfaction with the expectant level of the records in the hospital targeted for a research and the level of agreement. The results were as follows; first, as for the rate of recording those each items, they were high in the chief complaint & present illness and the past illness history. Depending on the group of recorders, the recording rate showed big difference by items. Second, as a result of measuring the level after dividing the recording level of items for the patient`s past history from Level 1 to Level 4 by each item, the admission history, the past illness history, and the family history were about Level 3, and the smoking history, the medication history, the chief complaint & present illness, the drinking history and allergy were about Level 2. In the admission department, it was excellent in the interns` records for the medical department. Third, as a result of its satisfactory level by comparing the expectant level of a record and the actual record by item in information on the patient`s past history, which was expected by the medical-record committee members of the hospital targeted for a study. And forth, we analyzed the level of agreement with Kappa score in the level of ``Yes`` or ``None`` related to the corresponding matter in Level 1, in terms of information on the past history in the intern`s record, the resident`s record, and the nurse`s record. The level of agreement in the resident`s record & the nurse`s record, and in the intern`s record & the resident`s record was from excellent to a little good. There were differences in the level of completeness and in reliability for the information on the past history by the recorder group or by the admission department. The encounter process that was performed by the admission department or the recorder group, indicated the result that was directly reflected on the quality of medical records, thus it was required further study about the medical record documentation process and quality of care. The items that showed the high recording rate quantitatively were rather low, consequently we`d should develop the tool for the qualitative inspection and evaluate the medical records further. And the items were needed to be detailed in the record level were rather low, and hence there needed to be a documentation guideline and education by the clinical departments.

사회적 기억과 구술 기록화 그리고 아키비스트

최정은 한국기록학회 2011 기록학연구 Vol.0 No.30

최근 기록학계의 화두는 ‘패러다임 변화’라 할 만 하다. 따라서 본 연구는 기록학 패러다임 변화와 관련하여 ‘사회적 기억’ 기록화 개념을 통해 구술기록과 기록학의 적연성있는 관계설정을 이루고자 한다. 또한 이를 바탕으로 구술기록의 특성을 반영한 기록학적 구술기록 관리의 주체로서의 아키비스트의 적극적 역할론을 뒷받침할 것이다. 특히 기존 연구를 통해 이미 다뤄진 내용이라 할지라도 나름의 관점을 적용하여 새로운 의미를 도출하는데 초점을 맞출 것이다. 본 연구의 주요 내용은 다음과 같다. 첫째, ‘사회적 기억’ 기록화 개념을 설정하여 논의하고자 한다. 이는 최근 기록학계의 ‘패러다임 변화’라는 화두와 관련된다. 주로 국외 기록학자들 사이에서 활발히 이루어졌음에도 국내에서는 아직 본격적으로 다루어지지 않았기에 본 연구에서는 이 부분을 정리하는 것을 세부 목표로 할 것이다. 둘째, 기록관리의 제 단계 중 특히 수집 및 기획 단계에 초점을 맞추어 논지를 전개한다. 기록학적 관점은 생산 시점 이전 기록의 수집 및 기획 단계에서 시작하여 그 이후 단계를 통합적으로 인식하기 위하여 반드시 반영되어야 한다. 따라서 가장 중요한 것은 수집 및 기획단계이며, 이는 생산이 곧 수집을 의미하는 구술기록의 특성과도 밀접하게 연관된다. 셋째, 기록학적 관점에서 ‘구술기록’의 개념의 설정이다. 많은 구술사 연구자들에게 ‘구술자료’라고 통칭되는 구술면담을 통해 생산된 각종 자료들을 기록학적 관점에서 ‘구술기록’으로서 개념화한다. 넷째, 기록학에서 왜 구술사를 다루어야 하는지에 대한 의미 설정이다. 기록학에서 구술사를 다루는 목적과 그 당위성을 학문적으로 정당화시킬 필요가 있다. 왜 기록학에서 구술사가 중요한 것인지, 그것이 어떤 의미가 있는지 스스로 명확히 해야 할 것이다. 이를 통해 ‘구술기록’의 기록화는 어떤 의미를 지니는가에 대해 살펴볼 것이다. 기록화를 통하여 구술기록은 그 자체의 특성을 효과적으로 드러낼 수 있으며 궁극적으로 구술사와 구술기록의 가치를 재조명할 수 있음을 말하고자 하는 것이다. 마지막으로 구술사에서 아키비스트의 역할을 정립하는 것이다. 구술사에서 아키비스트는 단지 연구자들이 수집해온 구술기록을 정리하고 보관하는 보조자가 아니라는 점을 강조하고 설득할 것이다. 본 연구에서 다루는 위와 같은 이론적 논의를 통해 당위성을 얻은 기록학계에서의 구술사 연구는 단순히 기록학에서 구술사를 점유하겠다는 것이 아닌 다른 학문과의 연계 속에서 한국 구술사 연구의 도약이라는 방향에서 이루어져야 할 것이다. 이것이 가능하다면, 기록학계의 발전과 연구범위의 확장, 그리고 아키비스트의 역할 신장과 가능성 제고에 기여할 것이며 동시에 구술사 연구에 궁극적으로 긍정적 영향을 미칠 것이다. Recently, a topic of Archival Science can be said 'paradigm shift'. Therefore, this study aims to establish a relationship between oral record and Archival Science through concept of the archiving 'social memory' related to paradigm shift of Archival Science. In addition, an active role theory by an archivist as main agent of archival oral record management reflecting the characteristics of oral record based on this will be supported. Especially, even if it has already been handled through previous studies, it will be focused on drawing new meaning by applying creative perspective. Main content of this study is as follows. Firstly, discussion will be progressed by establishing the concept of the archiving 'social memory'. This is related to the topic of 'paradigm shift' in the Archival Science. Despite that active research has been conducted among mainly archival researchers overseas, it has not been handled yet in Korea. Therefore, this study aims to determine to organize this part as detail purpose. Secondly, the point will be progressed with a special focus on collecting and planning stages among the stages of records management. A viewpoint of the Archival Science should start from the stage of collecting and planning the previous record of production point of time, and then should be reflected for acknowledging the subsequent stages. Therefore, collecting and planning are the most important, and this is closely connected with a characteristic of oral record which production means collecting. Thirdly, the concept of 'oral record' is established with the viewpoint of the Archival Science. The various documents have been producted through oral interview has been known to many oral history researchers as 'oral source'. It aims to conceptualize them as 'oral record' with the viewpoint of the Archival Science. Fourthly, it is an establishment of meaning why oral history should be handled in the Archival Science. It is necessary to rationalize the purpose and its appropriateness handling oral history in the Archival Science. It should clarify the reason why oral history is important in the Archival Science and what it means. This will help examine the meaning of the recording of 'oral record.' A characteristic of the oral record can be effectively revealed through the recording, and ultimately, it aims to be able to shed new light on the value of oral history and oral record. Finally, it defines the role of archivist in oral history. A point that archivist in oral history is not just an assistant who organizes and preserves oral records collected by researchers will be emphasized and persuaded. In this study, oral history study in the Archival Science which has obtained appropriateness by the theoretical discussion as above should be conducted in a connection with other studies without occupying oral history by the Archival Science and in a direction of the leap of Korean oral history study. If this is possible, it will contribute to development of the Archival Science and of study area expansion, enhancement of the role and potential of archivist, at the same time, eventually it will positively influence on oral history study.

‘육국사(六國史)’의 편찬과 ‘일본율령국가’의 수사(修史)사업 - <속일본기>와 <일본삼대실록>을 중심으로 -

송완범 일본사학회 2016 일본역사연구 Vol.43 No.-

The late 7thcentury was a period when the Japanese ancient statutory nation(日本律令國家) started to be settled. After the period, the basic history books of the Japanese ancient statutory nation, ‘The Records of Ancient Matters’ and ‘The Chronicles of Japan’ were published. The distinct characteristics of the statutory nation include: i) ‘enactment of the statute’, which is the basic law of a nation, ii) ‘publication of the government-compiled history books’, which are the official historical records of a nation governed by the statute, and iii) ‘establishment of palace (宮) and capital (京), also known as royal palace (宮都) and capital city (都城), where the statutory ideologies were realized. The ‘national history’ of the statutory nation is generally called, The Six History Records of Japan (六國史)”. However, The Six History Records of Japan (六國史) can be categorized into ‘The Chronicles of Japan’ and the ‘five history records’, from the perspective of a record compiled before and after the establishment of the statutory nation. With regards to the compilation of The Six History Records of Japan, resulted from the historiographic works of the Japanese ancient statutory nation, ‘A Historical Diary of Japan Zoku Nihon ki’ is important as an outcome of the practical historiographic works of the statutory nation. It is also necessary to focus on ‘The Annals of Three Reigns of Japan’, which was the last part of The Six History Records of Japan and the last historical compilation of the statutory nation. According to the analysis, the implications of the historiographic works as a large-scale official historic compilation of the statutory nation were as follows: First, it was able to differentiate the views on The Six History Records of Japan including ‘The Chronicles of Japan’ as a record before and after The Six History Records of Japan and before and after the establishment of the statutory nation. Second, it was able to have more multi-faceted and multi-layered points of views on the existing six history records. Lastly, the reference to the historiographic works helped develop more diverse and delicate perspectives on the Japanese ancient statutory nation.

『삼국사기』초기 기록과 삼국 초기사의 재검토

최범호 전북사학회 2009 전북사학 Vol.0 No.35

This study is to examine how we will actually understand the records of the early times in Samkuksaki(『三國史記』). First of all, this saw how a angle of disbelief in them was formed and have been changed, and then whether the records of "Dong-i chon"(「東夷傳」) in the Samgukchi(『三國志』) were trusted which were used to deny early records of Samkuksaki. And by trying to more actively interpret early records of Samkuksaki, the thesis is to push the button of the transformation of perception that we should newly interpret them. For early history of establishments of the Three-Kingdoms in the surveys of Korean history, history of Shilla was recorded to skip suddenly from founder Park Hyeokgeose(朴赫居世) in 57 B.C. to 17th Nea-mul Maripkan(奈勿麻立干: 356∼402), history of Goguryeo from founder King Dong-myeong(東明王) in 37 B.C. to 6th King Tea-Cho(太祖王: 53∼146) and history of Baekje from founder King On-cho(溫祚王) in 18 B.C. to King Ko-I(古爾王). Contemporary records of "Silla-bonki"(「新羅本紀」), "Goguryeo-bonki"(「高句麗本紀」) and "Baekje-bonki"(「百濟本紀」) in the Samkuksaki were quite rich, and recorded dynamic and varied appearances of Three-Kingdoms. Nevertheless, early history of Three-Kingdoms in the surveys of Korean history was neglected. For most Korean historians mainly avoided that age with accepting the disbelief in early history as the orthodoxy of Korean history. Although some records were mentioned, they were treated as history of Sam-Han(三韓) on the basis of "Dong-i chon" or early histories of Samkuksaki were seen as the later age's articles after Japanese analyzed and readjusted contemporary records' chronology(紀年). Because this phenomenon was influenced by a view of disbelief in early records of Samkuksaki which was produced to limit, distort and obliterate Korean history in the end of 19th. In this manner, they modified the king genealogy(王系) and chronology of Three Kingdoms, analyzed some of records with other records, and reformed early records of Samkuksaki. This, however, was based on the records of “Dong-i chon” in the Samgukchi. After all, they could not believe early records of Samkuksaki in themselves, and thus reform them according to the contents of “Dong-i chon”. While we distrusted the early records of Samkuksaki and denied the history of Three-Kingdoms, Chinese and Japanese have taken up this historical blank, distorted the Korean history and stolen Korea`s ancient history. Accordingly, we need the transformation of perception that we accept positively and interpret the early records of Samkuksaki, and thereby require to fill up the blank in history of Three-Kingdoms.

거창지역의 기록과 지역사교육

愼鏞均(Shin, Yong Kyun) 역사교육연구회 2017 역사교육 Vol.141 No.-

With respect to history education in Korea, local history can contribute to a multi-layered and multifaceted historical awareness by demonstrating to students a different level of history rather than a national history. This paper reviews the records in Geochang and explores the possibility of a new local history education. Pre-modern records include official histories, geography books, townchronicles, anthologies, Genealogies and lapidary-inscriptions. The modern records include the official records of Japanese imperialism period, newspapers, and magazines. The nature of a town-chronicles provided the foundation for the study of local history because it was succeeded by the local geography book. As a result, the local history of Geochang emphasized the prevalence of loyalty to the pre-modern dynasty and, therefore, has limits on the extent to which modern history can be faithfully described. In Geochang, relics and ruins from the Paleolithic Age to the Iron Age remain, and the presence of local forces and their transition can be ascertained in Geochang. The history of regional forces, regional relationships, regional and central relations, and regional and external relations can also be reconstructed as synoptic history. Local history records help students see for themselves the diversity of their peers and other interests in the same case because they demonstrate the different interests and perspectives on the same incident. Students can also access multiple historical perspectives by comparing Korean history with local history. Therefore, it is necessary to link local education courses to the National History Curriculum.

일개 대학병원에서 입원 환자 의무기록의 충실도

김연철,박기흠,정휘수,이동욱 동국대학교 의학연구소 2008 東國醫學 Vol.15 No.1

Medical records show the present illness, medical history and other informations of a patient. Thus, accurate medical records are important. This study was designed to analyze medical records of residents who first meet and acquire information from patients, and learn the completeness of medical records. From 2005 to 2007, medical students were lectured on medical records, and reviewed medical records of all the admitted patients, except the department of neuropsychiatry. 677 charts were reviewed. 144 were excluded due to inadequate checklists and 533 were analyzed. The checklist included the department the patient was admitted to, year of residency, chief complaint, present illness, medical history, family history and social history. Chief complaint was in 518(97.2%) records, and 231(43.3%) recorded the time of onset. Among 7 items expressing the symptoms, the mean number of items included was 3.05±1.40. Records on location was in 383(71.9%) cases, but modifying factors was recorded in 38(7.1%) cases, being the lowest. Medical history was in 430(80.7%) cases, and 67(12.6%) included family history. Smoking history in pack years was in 63(11.9%) cases, and alcohol recorded by type, amount, and frequency was in 46(8.6%) cases, and occupation was in 16(3%) cases. Chief complaint and medical history was recorded well, but records on present illness, family history, smoking, alcohol, and occupation was inefficient. Among 7 items expressing the symptoms, a mean number of 3 were included in the present illness; the location was recorded most sufficiently, and modifying factors was recorded most insufficiently. 의무기록을 보면 환자의 현병력 및 기타 병력 그리고 여러 정보를 알 수 있다. 그러므로 정확한 의무기록이 중요하다. 처음으로 환자를 대하고 정보를 얻어내는 전공의들의 의무기록을 분석하여 의무기록의 충실도를 알아보고자 하였다. 2005년부터 2007년까지 매년 모 의과대학 의학과 1학년들에게 의무기록 작성에 대한 강의를 실시한 후 실습시간을 이용하여 학생들과 병동을 방문하여 정신과를 제외한 당일 1개 병원의 입원 환자 전체의 의무기록을 하루 동안 조사하였다. 3년간 677명을 조사하였고, 이 중 점검표가 제대로 작성되지 않은 144개를 제외한 533개를 분석하였다. 의무기록 조사용 점검표는 환자의 입원과, 전공의 년차, 주소, 현병력, 과거력, 가족력, 사회력으로 구성되었다. 의무기록 중 주소는 518예(97.2%)에서 기록되어 있었고, 발생 시간을 내원 시간 기준으로 기록한 경우는 231예(43.3%)였다. 현병력의 증상표현에 대한 7가지 항목 중 평균 포함 갯수는 3.05±1.40개였다. 이 중 부위에 대한 기록은 383예(71.9%)로 전체적으로 높았으나 조절인자에 대해서는 38예(7.1%)로 가장 낮았다. 과거력과 가족력은 각각 430예(80.7%) 및 67예(12.6%)에서 기록되었다. 사회력에서는 흡연력을 갑년으로 표시한 경우는 63예(11.9%), 음주력을 술의 종류, 횟수, 음주량 등으로 기록한 경우는 46예(8.6%)이었다. 직업력은 16예(3%)에서 기록되었다. 주소 및 과거력에 대한 의무기록은 잘되었으나 현병력, 가족력, 흡연력, 음주력 및 직업력에 대한 기록은 미비하였다. 현병력 증상표현의 7가지 항목의 평균 포함 개수는 3개였으며, 이 중 부위가 가장 잘 기록되었다.

중국학계의 백제사 연구 현황과 전망

위가야 동북아역사재단 2022 東北亞歷史論叢 Vol.- No.77

Assuming that the historical perception based on the “unified multiethnic state theory” is the foundation of the Northeast Project, the space of Baekje history is located outside the current Chinese territory. This is the reason why there were not many achievements in analyzing Chinese research on Baekje history from the perspective of China’s distortion of ancient Korean history based on the so-called “historical perception based on the Northeast Project”. However, Chinese academic circles have recently been expanding their interest in areas that were outside the scope of the Northeast Project. Now it is necessary to reorganize and analyze Baekje history research in China that have been identified so far. This article aims to organize current research situation based on the existing trends on Baekje history research in Chinese academic circles, and examines it by reviewing the system and contents of recent publications, Chronicles of Baekje History(『百濟歷史編年』) and Baekje·Collection of History(『百濟·集史』). Research results of Baekje history in China confirmed so far are over 360 pieces which show huge increase in quantity since 2000. A distinctive feature in the topic selection is that the research on international relations, cultural exchanges, and refugees takes significant proportion. Since the 2000s, the number of articles related to historical perception, politics, system, economy, and research history has increased. This article has confirmed the following facts by analyzing the composition and content of the recently published Chronicles of Baekje History and Baekje·Collection of History. Chronicles of Baekje History will serve as a collection of historical records that provides a foundation for subsequent research and a milestone that suggests the direction of the research. Another fact is that Baekje·Collection of History aims to build a foundation for future research on Baekje history in China by providing comprehensive information along with compiling Baekje history research in Chinese academic circles. Another characteristic of recent research is that there are many results that have attempted micro-analysis focusing only on the content of the historical material itself. This means that the basis of Baekje history research has been expanding in China. This expansion is expected to promote presenting more organized academic research results through the foundation of Baekje history research completed by Chronicles of Baekje History and Baekje·Collection of History. This is the reason why Korean academic circles should not lose interest in future research achievements while reorganizing the research results of Baekje history in China. ‘통일적다민족국가론’에 입각한 역사 인식이 동북공정의 기반이 되었다고 할 때, 백제사의 공간은 현재의 중국 영토 밖에 존재한다. 이 때문에 이른바 ‘동북공정식 역사 인식’에 입각한 중국의 한국 고대사 왜곡이라는 관점에서 중국의 백제사 연구를 분석한 성과는 많지 않았다. 그러나 최근 중국학계는 동북공정의 대상에서 벗어나 있던 영역에까지 관심을 보이고 있다. 현재까지 확인된 중국의 백제사 연구를 다시 정리하고 분석해야 할 까닭이 여기에 있다. 이 글에서는 중국학계의 백제사 연구 동향에 대한 기존 연구들을 토대로 현재까지의 연구 현황을 개략적으로 정리하고, 최근 출간된 『백제역사편년(百濟歷史編年)』과 『백제·집사(百濟·集史)』의 체제와 내용을 검토하여 연구 동향의 현황을 점검하였다. 현재까지 확인된 중국의 백제사 연구 성과는 360여 편이며, 2000년 이후 연구의 양적 증가폭이 크다는 것을 알 수 있다. 주제 선정에서 두드러지는 특징은 국제관계와 문화교류 및 유민 관련 연구 주제의 비중이 압도적이라는 것이다. 2000년대 이후에는 역사인식과 정치·제도·경제 및 연구사 관련 논문이 증가하고 있는 모습이 확인된다. 최근 발간된 『백제역사편년』과 『백제·집사』의 구성과 내용을 분석한 결과 다음과 같은 사실을 확인할 수 있다. 『백제역사편년』은 후속 연구의 토대를 제공하는 사료집인 동시에 연구의 방향을 제시하는 이정표의 역할을 할 것으로 보인다. 『백제·집사』는 이제까지 중국학계에서 이루어진 백제사 연구를 집성하는 것과 함께 향후 연구를 위한 정보를 종합적으로 제공하여 향후 중국에서의 백제사 연구의 토대를 구축하는 데 편찬의 목적이 있다고 여겨진다. 최근 중국에서 이루어지는 백제사 연구의 또 다른 특징은 사료의 내용 자체에 천착한 미시적 분석이 시도된 연구 성과가 다수 제출되고 있다는 점을 들 수 있다. 이는 중국에서 백제사 연구의 저변이 확대되고 있음을 보여준다. 이러한 연구 저변의 확대가 『백제역사편년』과 『백제·집사』를 통해 완비된 백제사 연구의 토대 위에서 학술적으로 좀 더 정비된 연구 성과의 제출을 촉진할 수 있을 것이다. 우리 학계가 중국에서 이제까지 이루어진 백제사 연구 성과를 다시금 정리하는 동시에 향후 이루어질 연구 성과에 관심의 끈을 놓지 않아야 하는 이유이다.

당대사 실록을 둘러싼 긴장, 규율, 그리고 지평

吳恒寧(Oh Hang-nyeong) 역사학회 2010 역사학보 Vol.0 No.205

The purpose of this paper is to find the wisdom and instruction of the Sillok, the Veritable Records(VR), which was the comtemporary history in the traditional East Asia, especially in Joseon Dynasty. The VR was'a national history' arranging and preserving public records (the first useful-ness), and transmitting them to descendants in the future(the second usefulness). And the VR was also a product of the development of the bureaucracy at the its turning point of Tang China. The recording or compilation of the comtemporary history sometimes leaded to conflicts for the interests of the persons and parties alive. This tension of the comtemporary history was continued through the life-cycle of the VR and controlled by the religious character of the idea of history since ancient confucianism which considered history as the last judgment of the social beings. In this sense, history was a wisdom of the symmetry among generations and civilizations in the past, present and future. Needless to say, the function of this wisdom was changed from time to time, especially from the buddhist society to the neo-confucian. This transition showed much more accomplishments on history than before. At the same time, the cultivation on history influenced on the level of professionalism in the history compilation. The Public Exam and the Royal Lecture accelerated this tendency in the bureaucracy of the Dynasty. The institutional devices on the VR as the comtemporary history might be summarized with two words, exclusion and confidentiality. The regulation of the VR compilation parallelled to the customs and rituals in the process of the VR compilation. Besides the VR, such as the Secretary Records substituted the first usefulness of the VR for the authentic and fair management of it. And I examined the character of the VR by the concepts of the archival studies. I think that the VR is a kind of the registry, so the concept of 'authenticity' and 'reliability' of the modem archival studies may be adopted to explain the exclusion and confidentiality of the VR. Futhermore, the VR is not the history in modem meaning but the archives that may over-come the limits and singularity of 'the history of nation-state'.

공민왕대 기사의 수록양식과 원전자료의 記事 전환방식

김난옥(KIM NANOK) 고려사학회 2013 한국사학보 Vol.- No.52

The annual average numbers of articles in the era of King Gongmin were 61 in the 「Sega(世家)」 in 〈Goryeosa (高麗史, History of Goryeo)〉 and 39 in the 〈Goryeosa Jeolyo (高麗史節要, Essentials of Goryeo History)〉 and thus the former was approximately 1.5 times of the latter. However, the increase and decrease in the number of articles over time of the former and the latter were generally proportional. The numbers of articles between the end of the 12th year and the 13th year of King Gongmin and between the end of the 14th year and the beginning of the 13th year of King Gongmin are much smaller compared to other periods because some of materials in original books were omitted or deleted in the complicated relationship with Yuan. The most notable thing in the recording systems of the 「Sega(世家)」 and the 〈Goryeosa Jeolyo (高麗史節要, Essentials of Goryeo History)〉 is that whereas the daily sexagenary cycles were indicated in approximately 85% of articles in the former, the daily sexagenary cycles were indicated in only approximately 9% of articles in the latter. In the case of the 〈Goryeosa Jeolyo (高麗史節要, Essentials of Goryeo History)〉, the daily sexagenary cycles were mostly omitted because many articles gathered were synthesized and summarized because of the principle of ’‘summarization’. Articles beginning with ‘this month’ or ‘this year’ were those for events that clearly occurred in the month or year but could not be dated to certain days. However, among the entire articles for the era of King Gongmin, the number of those beginning with ‘this month’ was only 8 and the number of those beginning with ‘this year’ was only 3. The reason why articles related to Hwanjo(桓祖) were included in the extremely small numbers of ‘this month(是月)’ and ‘this year(是年)’ articles was that the articles related to Hwanjo(桓祖) were added when ‘Goryeo History’ was complied in the Joseon Dynasty period. The Lee Seong-Gye related articles contained in the 「Sega(世家)」 and the 〈Goryeosa Jeolyo (高麗史節要, Essentials of Goryeo History)〉 are almost the same as those in the 「Taejo Series(太祖總序)」 and excessively decorated the achievements of Lee Seong-Gye compared to the activities of persons in the era of King Gongmin recorded in the 「Biographies(列傳)」. As with the case of Hwanjo(桓祖) related articles, this was because the achievements of Lee Seong-Gye were unnaturally included in the 「Sega(世家)」 and the 〈Goryeosa Jeolyo (高麗史節要, Essentials of Goryeo History)〉. The preface and messages in 〈Mokeunmungo(牧隱文藁)〉 were recorded in detail in 「Sega(世家)」 and briefly in the 〈Goryeosa Jeolyo (高麗史節要, Essentials of Goryeo History)〉. Cases where terms such as proclamation(宣旨) and royal messages(勅書) were irregularly changed in the process of converting the content of the anthology into articles in the 「Sega(世家)」 and the 〈Goryeosa Jeolyo (高麗史節要, Essentials of Goryeo History)〉 could be found. The reason for this is considered to be the confusion resulted from frequent changes in the principle of compilation of the ‘Goryeo History’ or the carelessness of compilers.

한국의 몽골사 연구 30년, 회고와 전망

류병재 한국몽골학회 2021 몽골학 Vol.- No.65

본 연구는 1990년 한·몽 수교 이후 한국의 몽골사 연구 30년간의 연구성과를 검토하고 향후 몽골사 연구 방향을 모색해 보고자 집필되었다. 한국의 몽골사 연구는 순수 몽골사 연구와 고려-몽골 관계사 측면으로 크게 양분된다고 할 수 있다. 이 가운데 칭기스칸과 그의 후예들의 역사인 몽골제국사부터 근현대 몽골인들의 역사를 아우르는 한국의 몽골사 연구성과는 짧은 시기에도 몽골제국사 사료 번역, 연구서 번역 및 전문 연구 등을 통해 양적·질적으로 괄목할만한 성장을 이룬 것을 확인하였다. 향후 한국의 몽골사 연구는 사료 이외에 다양한 자료들을 활용하여 그 연구범위를 확대하고, 고려-몽골 관계사에서 고려사 연구자들과 협업이 필요할 것이다. 또한 현재까지도 한국어 표기에서의 오류 등도 반드시 수정할 필요가 있다. This study was written in order to examine the 30-year research result in South Korea on Mongolian history after the diplomatic relations between South Korea and Mongolia in 1990, and to seek the research direction of Mongolian history henceforth. A research in South Korea on Mongolian history can be considered to be divided largely into the research of focusing on Mongol empire history and the aspect on the history of the Goryeo-Mongol relationship. In the middle of this, the research outcome in South Korea of Mongolian history covering the history of the modern & contemporary Mongolians starting from the Mongol empire history, which is the history of Genghis Khan and his descendants, was confirmed to have achieved remarkable growth quantitatively and qualitatively through translating the historical records of Mongol empire, translating the research documents, and making the professional research even in a short period of time. A future research in South Korea on Mongolian history will expand its research scope through using diverse materials other than historical records and will require the collaboration with Goryeo history researchers in the history of the Goryeo-Mongol relationship. Also, there is a need to certainly correct errors that appear now in Korean notation as for the terms related to Mongolian history.