중환자에서 약물에 의한 위장관 기능 저하와 위장관 기능 촉진제의 약물유해반응

김형숙 ( Hyung Sook Kim ) 한국정맥경장영양학회 2014 한국정맥경장영양학회지 Vol.6 No.3

Impaired gastrointestinal (GI) motility is extremely common in the intensive care unit (ICU), affecting up to 50% of mechanically ventilated patients and up to 80% of patients with traumatic brain injury. This includes disturbances in esophageal, gastric, small intestinal, and colonic function; alone or in combination. Impaired upper GI motility can lead to reflux, aspiration, vomiting, high gastric residuals, and interruptions in enteral nutrition. In critically ill patients, prolonged constipation may cause delayed weaning from mechanical ventilation, lengthened ICU stay, and inability to take in enteral nutrition; at least one study has suggested an association between delayed defecation and both increased bacterial infections and mortality. Drugs used for analgesia and sedation are commonly associated with impaired gastric and small intestinal motility in critically ill patients. Drugs frequently impair gastric motility via one or more mechanisms, and the precise mechanisms of drug-induced hypomotility are often unknown. Therefore, measures to prevent drug-induced motility disturbances include correction of fluid and electrolyte imbalances, early enteral feeding, and judicious use of drugs known to alter motility. Prokinetic agents are currently the mainstay of therapy for impaired GI motility in the critically ill. Of the available prokinetic agents, current information, while limited, suggests that erythromycin or metoclopramide (alone or in combination) are effective in management of feeding intolerance for the critically ill in terms of evidence-based practice. Based on the current evidence evaluating the adverse effects of prokinetic agents in critical illnesses and the lack of prokinetic agents with a safer adverse effect profile, the ongoing need for prokinetic drugs in these patients should be reviewed daily in order to minimize avoidable adverse effects.

Characteristics and Management of Cyclosporine-associated Adverse Gastrointestinal Events

( Won Seon Koh ),( Young Wook Ko ),( Jeong Eun Kim ),( Joo Yeon Ko ),( Young Suck Ro ) 대한피부과학회 2019 大韓皮膚科學會誌 Vol.57 No.10

Background: Cyclosporine (CS) is widely used to treat various skin diseases. Gastrointestinal (GI) discomfort is the most common adverse effect of orally administered CS for dermatologic indications. However, few studies on CSassociated adverse GI events have been conducted. Objective: In this study, we aimed to describe the major features of adverse GI events associated with CS therapy using a validated symptom questionnaire, and to investigate the factors contributing to their development. We also evaluated the effectiveness of three empirical GI medications in relieving adverse GI events. Methods: This study consisted of 2 phases. Phase I was a prospective observational cohort study to investigate the characteristics of CS-associated adverse GI events in 942 consecutive patients treated with CS. Phase II was a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of three different classes of GI medications. Results: CS-associated adverse GI events occurred in 119 patients (12.6%). GI complications were more common in female patients (p=0.04), patients with a history of GI disorders (p=0.02), and patients whose initial CS doses were greater than 3 mg/kg/day (p=0.05). In patients treated with any one of the three GI medications, the mean Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale scores significantly decreased (p<0.001). Conclusion: This study demonstrated that adverse GI events are common during early CS treatment, especially in women, patients receiving high doses of CS, and those with a history of GI disorders. Our results suggest that new-onset CS-associated GI side effects can be effectively managed with the addition of GI medications. (Korean J Dermatol 2019;57(10):608∼616)

제2형 당뇨병 환자에서 Voglibose와 Acarbose의 비교임상연구

정인경,정재훈,민용기,이명식,이문규,김광원,정윤이,박중열,홍성관,이기업 대한당뇨병학회 2002 Diabetes and Metabolism Journal Vol.26 No.2

연구배경:아카보스와 보글리보스는 ­glucosidase inhibitors로써 비록 약리학적 작용이나 부작용에 있어서 두 약물간에 차이가 있다는 것은 잘 알려져 있으나 당뇨병 환자를 대상으로 아직 이에 대한 두 약물간에 직접적인 비교에 대해 연구된 바는 없었다. 이에 저자등은 국내 2형 당뇨병 환자에 대해 유효성과 부작용 발현에 대해 두 약제를 비교하고자 무작위법에 의한 위약 대조군의 이중 맹검법 연구를 시행하였다. 방법:시험 약제 투여 4주간의 관찰기를 설정하여 공복혈당의 변화가 30㎎/dL 이하이고, 식후 혈당이 200㎎/dL 이상인 환자로 기타 제외 기준에 해당하지 않은 환자 53명을 대상으로 하여 보글리보스 군(24명)과 아카보스 군(29명)으로 무작위로 나누었다. 치료기간은 총 8주로 하였으며, 4주간 간격으로 혈청학적 검사와 부작용을 분석하여 치료 효과가 부작용을 평가하였다. 결과:1)혈당 변화:보글리보스군은 식후 1시간 혈당이 치료 후 4주, 8주째 의미 있게 감소하였도, 아카보스군은 식후 1시간과 2시간 혈당이 치료 후 4주, 8주째 의미있게 감소하였다. 또한 관찰기 혈당에 대한 치료 4주째 감소량은 아카보스군에서 더 큰 경향을 보였으나, 치료 8주째에는 두 군 간의 강하정도에 의미있는 차이가 없었다(p=0.569). 2)인슐린 치의 변화:보글리스 군은 식후 1시간 인슐린 치가 치료 전에 비해 치료 4주, 8주째 감소하는 경향을 보였고, 공복 인슐린이나 식후 2시간 인슐린치는 치료전 후에 의미 있는 차이가 없었다. 아카보스군에서는 치료 전후로 공복 인슐린, 식후 1시간과 2시간 인슐린치에 의미 있는 차이를 보이지 않았다. 두약제 간에 치료 전과 치료 8주사이의 식후 2시간 인슐린의 감소량이 보글리보스 군에서 의미있게 높았다(p=0.040). 3)당화혈색소:보글리보스 군은 치료 전에 비해 치료후 당화혈색소가 감소하는 경향을 보였고, 아카보스군은 치료 전에 비해 의미있게 감소하였다. 당화혈색소 변화량은 두 군간에 의미 있는 차이는 없었다(p=0.412). 4)지질대사의 변화:중성지방, 콜레스테롤, 고밀도 진단백 콜레스테롤에 대해 두 군간에 의미 있는 차이는 없었다. 5)부작용:소화기계 부작용의 빈도는 치료 4주째 보글리보스 군에서 의미 있게 낮았으나(p=0.028), 치료 8주째 부작용의 빈도는 두 군간에 의미 있는 차이가 없었다(p=0.215). 결론:2형 당뇨병 환자에서 보글리보스와 아카보스의 두 약제의 임상적 유효성과 부작용발현에 대해 비교한 결과 치료 후 8 주 후 혈당강화효과는 두 약제간에 유사한 효과를 보였으나 보글리보스군에서 4주째의 초기 위장관 부작용이 적었다. Background : Acarbose and voglibose are alpha-glucosidase inhibitors. Although different pharmacological effects and adverse abdominal events associated with the two drugs have been reported, no study directly compared acarbose and voglibose in diabetes has been undertaken. To compare the pharmacological effects and gastrointestinal adverse events between two drugs, a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-bind study was performed in type 2 diabetes patients. Methods : The period of study was 12 weeks(observation period: 4 weeks; treatment period: 8 weeks). Fifty-three patients were randomized into two groups(the acarbose group: 24 patients; the voglibose group: 29 patients). The serum glucose, insulin, fructosamine, HbA_1c, cholesterol, triglyceride and the incidence of adverse events were measured. Results : 1) The reduction of glucose from before treatment to 4 weeks after treatment was significantly higher in the acarbose group, but the change before treatment and 8 weeks after treatment in the two groups was similar(p=0.569). 2) The insulin significantly decreased after voglibose treatment(p=0.040). 3) HbAa_1c level tended to decrease in voglibose group, and there was a significant decrease after acarbose treatment. However, the change in HbA_1c level before and after treatment was similar between the two groups(p=0.412). 4) The two drugs did not cause any other changes in the total, HDL-cholesterol and triglyceride. 5) The number of patients with gastrointestinal adverse events was significantly low 4 weeks after voglibose treatment (p=0.049), but the incidence in the two groups was similar after 8 weeks(p=0.215). Conclusions : Acarbose and voglibose significantly improved postprandial hyperglycemia in diabetes. The incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events was low 4 weeks after voglibose treatment(J Kor Diabetes 26:134~145, 2002).

비스테로이드소염제 유발 위창자병증

김정욱 ( Jeong Wook Kim ) 대한소화기학회 2008 대한소화기학회지 Vol.52 No.3

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are used for the management of various conditions, such as pain, fever, inflammation, cancer, or cardiovascular diseases. These drugs may induce injury throughout the gastrointestinal tract. NSAIDs are associated with diverse upper gastrointestinal adverse effects, including dyspepsia, erosions, peptic ulcer diseases and complications such as bleeding perforation. Established risk factors for these adverse effects include age, prior ulcer, types, doses and duration of NSAIDs, concurrent other NSAIDs administration, and the concomitant uses of corticosteroids or anticoagulants. Misoprostol, proton pump inhibitors, and cyclooxygenase-2 selective inhibitors have been used to reduce the risk of NSAID-associated upper gastrointestinal events. NSAID-induced enteropathy is more common than complications of the stomach and duodenum and is usually manifested by occult blood loss or hypoalbuminemia. Furthermore, NSAIDs induce small intestinal injuries causing gut barrier damage, and bacterial translocation that have been proposed to be associated with the burden of illness in decompensated chronic heart failure. However, the risk factors for NSAID-induced enteropathy and bacterial translocation, as well as its preventive measures, are not well documented. (Korean J Gastroenterol 2008;52:134-141)