http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 정영덕 ( Young Duck Jung ) (검색결과 2 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
정영덕 ( Young Duck Jung ) 안암법학회 2011 안암 법학 Vol.0 No.36
Term 3, Clause 27 of the Constitution regulates ``All nations have the right to face the trial rapidly.``, but as the burden of Public Prosecution`s Office for the cases in our country is likely to be too heavy at present, the rapid service for the criminal procedure can not be sufficiently bestowed on the nations with the prosecutors` manpower only, and it can not be guaranteed that the substantive investigation for protection of the human rights of the nation is sufficient and it can not be also said that the prosecutor`s direction of investigation for the important case is sufficient and detailed. Therefore, as the alternative for the above outstanding matter, it was reviewed over the necessity and improvement plan of the probational prosecutor system, which is being executed in Public Prosecution`s Office nationwide. In concrete, as for the direction of investigation to supplement the summary case after being sent to the police station, as it is the most essential for the probational prosecutor to decide whether to prosecute it, the regulations to be bestowed within the summary record being sent shall be newly established, and as it seems that this point becomes the opportunity for the police officer also to supplement the case record through this. Besides this, the matters for separation of the minor offense/grave offense, installation of Public Prosecution`s Office in city and gun in case the city/gun court is faced, constitutional matter of the probational prosecutor and guarantee of its position shall be also discussed in the deeper way. And as for the claim for seizure/search warrant of the probational prosecutor, the claim to demand shall be legislatively bestowed through the chief prosecutor in charge but it will be proper for the necessity for such claim to be verified during the approval of the chief prosecutor in charge. Also, relative to the qualification of the probational prosecutor, it will be recommended to establish and execute the educational course regularly, and as for the scope of the probational prosecutor`s duty, as it is true that the name of crime of the summary case is being widen to increase the business concentration of the prosecutor, it seems that its actualization plan will be necessary by changing the regulations actually in the legislative aspect. It is considered that as for the introduction matter of the deputy prosecutor system, as the prosecution administrator system treating the prosecutor`s business is absolutely supported, rather than the deputy prosecutor system, like Japan, our case will not be different. Finally, it is true that the nations worry about the protection of human rights, but this study thought over that the improvement plan to overcome some outstanding matters and to make the rapid and proper treatment of the case with the sufficient experience and the investigation capacity of the probational prosecutor.
-
정영덕 ( Young Duck Jung ) 법조협회 2011 法曹 Vol.60 No.8
본 글에서는 우선 외국의 공판 및 수사절차상의 피해자 참가제도에 대하여 검토한 후, 현재 어떤 규정이 있는지 확인하고, 향후 우리는 우리나라의 형소법상 피해자참가제도를 규정할 경우 어떤 규정을 수사절차상에도 규정해야 될 것인가에 대하여 검토를 해보아야 되며, 현재 입법예고된 법무부의 법률안에 어떤 내용이 규정되어 있는지, 추가로 수사절차상 피해자참가규정을 포함시킨다면 어떤 내용을 규정할 것인지에 대하여 검토해보고자 한다. 그리고 그 주요내용들은 수사단계에서의 피해자 의견진술권, 피해자참가국선변호인제도, 신뢰관계있는 자의 의무적 동석, 수사관에 대한 제척·기피제도 도입의 내용이다. 한편으로 과연 피해자보호를 위하여 시스템만 반복적으로 새롭게 만드는 형식적 행위가 과연 피해자의 인권을 실질적으로 보호할 수 있는지에 대하여 깊게 생각을 해보고, 따라서 많은 부분을 법으로 전부 규정할 수는 없지만 몇 가지 점에 대하여 수사절차에 피해자 참가를 규정함으로써 그동안의 반복적 실수를 줄일 수 있으며, 체계적으로 피해자의 인권을 수사절차에서 보호할 수 있기 위해서는 수사절차상 피해자참가제도의 도입을 생각해보아야 한다. 그러므로 이런 점들에 대하여 공청회와 본격적인 토론을 시작해보아야 할 것이다. 또한 이러한 논의가 너무 앞서나갈지는 모르나 검토해보고 고민해보는 것이 무의미한 행위는 아니라고 생각한다. In this abstract, after first reviewing system of victim participation in foreign trial and investigation procedure, confirm what provisions there are presently, and we shall review what provisions to be provided in investigation procedures when we provide for victim participation system in Korean Criminal Procedure hereinafter, and we shall review what provisions are provided for in the draft law of Korean Ministry of Justice contained in the legislative notice presently and additionally what contents to be provided for if we include victim participation provisions in investigation procedure. And major contents thereof shall be victim`s right to state opinion in the stage of investigation, public defender system in victim participation, mandatory presence of party with trust relation, and inducement of exclusion/evasion system for investigator. On the one hand, we should think over inducement of victim participation system in investigation procedures to systematically protect the human rights of victim in investigation procedures, brooding over if formal act of newly making system repetitively indeed practically protect the human rights of victim, and therefore to reduce the repetitive mistakes so far by providing for some points although many parts may not be all provided for. Therefore, we should start hearing and regularized discussion on such points. Also, we think such discussion may be going out too much far ahead but it may not be pointless act to review and agonize.
KCI
KISS연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
