한국항공우주산업(주) 이일우 KFX 프로그램 Chief Engineer

이일우,안재명 한국항공우주학회 2021 KSAS 매거진 Vol.15 No.2

스트레스 개선을 위한 지시적 미술치료가 유아의 자율신경계 변화에 미치는 영향

이일우 원광대학교 2005 論文集 Vol.35 No.-

This study was purposed to find that the structured art therapy on easing stress is effective for infant's autonomic nervous system. 12 subjects were divided into the control group of 6 and the experimental group of 6 from the preschool which is located in Gyeonggi. The method of study is to proceed two sessions of the structured art therapy, and investigate the change in SDNN, norm LF, norm HF, LF/HF through prior, post examine to measure heart rate variability. The result of the study was verified that norm LF for the structured art therapy proceeded experimental group became statistically low, and norm HF became statistically higher.

非定型動詞 補文의 含意

이일우 安東大學 1988 安東大學 論文集 Vol.10 No.1

This study deals with the implicativeness as it is manifested in infinitival and gerundive constructions. With the survey of theoretical background of it, logical and pragmatic phenomena of it is investigated through the examples of English and Korean. The factors determining the degree of likelihood with which the event expressed in infinitival and gerundive construction that is due to varing degrees of the presuppositional force carried by their non-finite complements have generally been handled in terms of implicativeness, which is shown as varing aspects according to verbs. Karttunen`s, Foldauf`s, Givon`s principles of varing aspects according to the verbs in implicativcs are dealt with. The assumption that complement-taking predicates would be subject to dichotomous choice[+L-implicative] vs [-L-implicative] is undue generalization, and it is insufficient to explain varing degrees of P-implicativeness purely in terms of variation in the temporal relations, so I have introduced the notion of P-implicativeness as concept sensitive to gradation to have a comprehensive analysis of these verts to take into account the syntactic opposition between the infinitival and the prepositional gerundive construction. In conclusion, this study has revealed the followings: 1. The domains of P-implicativeness lies in what has generally been regarded as a dichotomy (+L-implicative) [L-implicative]. 2. It is this vagueness and indeterminacy with respect to class membership that can be seen one common property of the issue of P-implicativeness. 3. A number of interacting factors occupying different position on the scale of importance determine the degree to which sentences are given a C+P-implicative]. 4. The implicative power of the gerundive construction is higher than that of the infinitive construction. 5. The structural opposition and the semantic degree are in inverse proportion to each other, that is, the lower verbs in the semantic degree are great in structural difference, while the higher verbs in the semantic degree are not great in the structural difference. In conclusion, the implicativeness of the complementation is clear by semantic characteristics of the main verbs as the logical point and independent features as the pragmatic contextualization.

의미 기술의 불확정성

이일우 안동대학교 어학연구소 1997 솔뫼어문논총 = Solmoe review on language and literature Vol.9 No.1

보문의 정보양상류

이일우 안동대학교 어학연구소 1991 솔뫼어문논총 = Solmoe review on language and literature Vol.3 No.1

The Information Modalities reflect the way the speaker intends the prepositional content to be taken: whether as information concerned with knowledge about the world or as information concerned with behavior in the world. The Information Modality includes both epistemic and root meanings. These are three types of epistemic meanings: one concerned with the truth of a proposition (the Truth Modality), a second one concerned with the future truth of a proposition (the Future Truth Modality), and a third one concerned with the occurrence of an event (the Occurrence Modality). Another type of Information Modality has a type of deontic or root meaning which is concerned with the performance of an act (the Action Modality). Each of these four modalities has a characteristic set of meanings and forms. These differences are summarized as follows : 1. Truth 1) about the truth or falsity of a proposition 2) subject-nor restrictions 3) predicate-no restrictions: interpreted as a proposition about permanent or temporary state, event, or act 4) time reference-no restrictions 5) aspect-no restrictions 6) tense-required if finite; sequence of tense constraint 7) complementizers: that, whether, or if, some higher predicates take infinitives also 8) mood-indicative 9) modals-must, may 2. Future Truth 1) about the future truth of a proposition 2) subject-no restrictions 3) predicate-interpreted as temporary, changeable state, event, or act and usually incompatible with permanent states 4) time reference-future 5) aspect-no restrictions 6) tense-required if finite: sequence of tense constraints 7) complementizers: that or infinitives 8) mood-future indicative 9) modals-will, may 3. Occurrence 1) about the occurrence of an event 2) subject-no restrictions 3) predicate-interpreted as an event: usually takes nonstative events or acts: states usually incompatible 4) time reference-same time as higher verb 5) aspect-in finite complements, same as higher verb 6) tense-required in finite complements; must be same as higher predicate 7) complementizers: infinitives and null complementizers, and that with certain higher predicates 8) mood-indicative 9) modal-can 4. Action 1) about the voluntary performance of an act 2) subject agent of act: identity restricted (self-and other directed) 3) predicate-interpreted as controllable act: takes voluntary acts; usually prohibits states, events, or passives 4) time reference-most constructions require future; some require same time as higher predicate 5) aspect-usually prohibited 6) tense-prohibited 7) complementizers: infinitives basic; that subjunctive with a few higher predicates 8) mood-subjunctive 9) modals-must and may (other-directed) will and can(self-and other directed)

간접의문문의 의미

이일우 안동대학교 어학연구소 1995 솔뫼어문논총 = Solmoe review on language and literature Vol.7 No.1

제 2언어 습득에서의 인지영역

이일우 안동대학교 어학연구소 1999 솔뫼어문논총 = Solmoe review on language and literature Vol.11 No.1

체성회다액도난사건(遞成會多額盜難事件)

이일우 한국사법행정학회 1968 사법행정 Vol.9 No.4

뇌수종을 동반한 신생아 척수수막류의 조기복원 수술 및 동시 뇌실복강간 교통술

이일우,이길송,강준기,최창락 대한신경외과학회 1992 Journal of Korean neurosurgical society Vol.21 No.6

Simultaneous early repair of the myelomeningocele and ventriculoperitoneal shunt in patients with myelomenimgocele and hydrocephalus not only decreases further brain damage, but also eliminates dangers of wound break down, CSF leak, and secondary CSF infection. During the years 1975∼1990, we have experienced 45 patients with neural tube dysraphism which consist of 32 lipomyelomenigocele, 8 myelomeningocele, 3 meningocele and 2 encephalocele. Among those, 7 patients underwent simultaneous repair of myelomeningocele and insertion of ventriculoperitoneal shunt. 2 Patients developed wound infection, but none of the patients developed myelomeningocele repair break down or shunt infection in the follow up period of 1 to 4 years. All patients underwent neuropsychological testing during their follow up period and 5 patients were found to have their normal growth and developments, 1 patient developed low intelligence and moderate degree gait disturbance and the other 1 patient developed voiding difficulty. The authors suggest that this technique may be safe and helpful in some infants born with a myelomeningocele and hydrocephalus overt at birth.

否定의 構造와 意味

이일우 安東大學 1986 安東大學 論文集 Vol.8 No.1

The observations about negation to be drawn from this study are not startling but desdriptive. Most of us are not probably aware of them instinctively and precisely. In chapter 1, I have observed about negation in English as follows; a) Sentence and constituent negation, employing the syntactic testframes for the identification of negation as either-conjoining, neither-conjoining, neg-appositive tag, and tag question (Klima). b) Special and nexul negation, the meaning of a sentence sometimes depends on the place of a negative element. We may say that the negative notion may belong logically either to one single idea (special negation) or to the combination of the two parts a nexus (nexul negation) (Jespersen). c) Clausal and subclausal negation (1) a. She wasn`t happy b. She was unhappy c. She was happy (a) and (b) are each in some sense negative. However, we noted that from a syntactic point of view there is a significant difference between (a) and (b)-namely, that (a) takes a coordinate tag with nor (or neither) while (b) takes one with so: She wasn`t happy and nor was Ed vs she was unhappy and so was Ed. The tag on (b) is just he same as for (c), analyzing them both as positive clauses, (a) is the negative counterpart of (c) while (b) is the positive counterpart of "She wasn`t unhappy" There is of course something negative about (b), the prefix un-, but in the light of the above syntactic contrast with (a) we will say that the negation in (a) is "clausal" while that in (b) is "subclausal" it does not affect the polarity of the clause as a whole (Huddleston). In chapter 2, I have noted the meaning of negation as affirmatives and non-affirmatives, negative forms and non assertive forms, especially employing some and any. Let us compare some and any; (2) a. As soon as she phoned this morning, I dashed out and bought any biscuits. b. The shop was closed so I couldn`t buy any biscuits. Any confers what we called a non-specific interpretation on the NP in which it is determiner or head. The non affirmative context in (b) creates an environment where we can have a non-specific NP, whereas (a) is anomalous because we are talking about a single act of buying that took place this morning, which means that there must be some specific biscuits that were bought. A non-affirmative context allows for anon-specific NP, but affirmative context does not always require specific one, as it does in (a). (3) a. Ed bought a house on HONOUR AVENUE (specific) b. Wd wants to buy a house on HONOUR AVENUE (non-specific) Some, like most determinatives, is not inherently specific or non-specific: it can occur in NPs with either interpretation. (4) a. I found someone who could require it (specific) b. I`m looking for someone who can repair it (non-specific) And in the interpreatation of a negative that has some quantification within its scope, I used a digram shows a selection of words expressing quantification ordered on a scale from low on the left to high on the right; some and any, many and some, a which covers not a portion of the scale but just a point.