인산염을 이용한 휴.폐광산 주변 중금속 오염토양의 안정화처리에 관한 연구

이은기,최상일,Lee, Eun-Gi,Choi, Sang-Il 한국지하수토양환경학회 2007 지하수토양환경 Vol.12 No.6

본 연구에서는 휴.폐광산 인근 납(Pb), 카드뮴(Cd), 비소(As)로 오염된 논토양에 대하여 $(NH_4)_2HPO_4$, $Na_2HPO_4{\cdot}12H_2O$, $Ca(H_2PO_4{\cdot}2H_2O$, $Ca(H_2PO_4)_2{\cdot}H_2O$, $H_3PO_4$를 안정화물질로 선정하여 $PO_4/Pb_{total}$의 몰비를 0.5, 1, 2, 4로 안정화 처리하였다. 안정화효율 평가를 위해 토양오염공정시험법과 TCLP(EPA Method 1311)를 수행한 결과, 납의 경우 $H_3PO_4$와 $Ca(H_2PO_4)_2{\cdot}H_2O$가 토양환경보전법상의 '가' 지역 기준을 만족하였으며, 특히 $H_3PO_4$의 경우 몰비가 증가할수록 안정화 효율이 급격히 증가하였다. 카드뮴은 납에 비하여 안정화효율이 매우 낮게 나타났으며, 비소의 경우 대부분의 안정화물질에서 안정화효율이 거의 나타나지 않거나 오히려 용출농도가 증가하였다. $H_3PO_4$가 다른 인산염 물질에 비해 납의 안정화에 높은 효율을 나타낸 것은 $H_3PO_4$에 의한 토양 pH의 저하로 인한 $Pb^{2+}$의 용출과 함께 $PO_4$가 반응하여 생성물인 hydroxypyromorphite(HP) 형성되었기 때문으로 판단된다. 연속추출법을 통한 안정화처리 전.후 토양내 중금속 결합형태의 변화는 $H_3PO_4$의 경우 5단계인 Residual fraction의 비율이 약 60% 정도 증가하였고 XRD 분석결과 $H_3PO_4$에서만 hydroxypyromorphite peak가 발견된 것과 일치하였다. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of $(NH_4)_2HPO_4$, $Na_2HPO_4{\cdot}12H_2O$, $CaHPO_4{\cdot}2H_2O$, $Ca(H_2PO_4)_2{\cdot}H_2O$ and $H_3PO_4$ for the stabilization of soils contaminated with multi-metals containing Pb, Cd and As. The application rate of stabilizers to soils was determined based on $PO_4/Pb_{total}$ molar ratio of 0.5, 1, 2, 4. The results of Korea Standard Test and TCLP (EPA Method 1311) showed the reduction of metal leachabilities below the regulatory limits for Pb and Cd when $H_3PO_4$ and $Ca(H_2PO_4)_2{\cdot}H_2O$ were applied. However, stabilization efficiency for Cd was low and in case of As leaching concentration increased rather. It is considered that $PO_4$ reacted effectively $Pb^{2+}$ due to leaching Pb under low pH condition created by adding $H_3PO_4$. Accordingly Pb was stabilized by dissolution and precipitation of hydroxypyromorphite. From the change of metals fraction using sequential extraction procedure when $H_3PO_4$ applied as a stabilizer, we confirmed that residual fraction increased more than 60% and this result was accorded with XRD analysis that detected only hydroxypyromorphite peak in $H_3PO_4$.

법치행정의 확립을 위한 행정법의 과제 : 법학전문대학원 설치인가관련 판결의 행정법적 검토 (제척사유의 해석 및 위임입법권과 재량권의 한계, 사정판결의 판단기준) -대법원 2009.12.10선고 2009두8359판결 및 2009.12.10.선고 2009두14606 판결을 중심으로1-

이은기 ( Eun Gi Lee ) 고려대학교 법학연구원 2010 고려법학 Vol.0 No.58

I explore on the problem of standing, interpretation of expulsive cause in the competitors` litigation and decisional criteria of public welfare in judicial decision after due consideration of circumstances(sajeungpangeyul) in this article. I evaluated the Supreme Court`s two decisions of permit- refusal of law school. In theses cases the Supreme Court has interpreted and applied art.13 and art.10 of Law school Act of expulsive cause very formally. The Supreme Court held that defendant`s administrative disposition(action) is not invalid but revocable. I think that the defendant`s action is capable of invalidity because of unconstitutionality (disposition based on unconstitutional legislation of art. 5 of law school act`s enforcement ordinance) and illegality by misapplication of above-mentioned Act. It has to be corrected in another cases in the near future. Our Administrative Litigation Act has provided on judicial decision after due consideration of circumstances at Article 28. The notion of `public welfare` which is the requirement of judicial decision after due consideration of circumstances is uncertain, abstract, vague and comprehensive. So the judiciary hasn`t defined it directly but has explained it indirectly in lots of separate cases. Therefore the judiciary is possible to interpret and apply it arbitrarily to a case. It is needed to establish reasonable and concrete criteria to apply public welfare to a case. In these cases I think judicial decision after due consideration of circumstances is inevitable for stable establishment of new law school system in these cases. But I guess we have been discovered some adverse effects of the system of judicial decision after due consideration of circumstances. Finally We have discovered some adverse effects of the system of judicial decision after due consideration of circumstances(sajeungpangeyul). For that reason it has to be gradually disappeared by utilizing alternatives as like temporary litigation system and preventing each case from accumulation of facts over the illegal administrative actions. In conclusion, according to above-mentioned reasons I think the Supreme Court`s two law school-related decisions are not proper. So it should be corrected later in other similar cases.

기업경영과 환경법

이은기 ( Eun Gi Lee ) 한국환경법학회 2011 環境法 硏究 Vol.33 No.2

인류생존에 필요한 물품생산을 위한 산업활동, 식량생산을 위한 화학비료나 농기계의 사용, 각종 교통수단의 운행 등은 그동안 화석연료의 사용에 의존해 왔다. 그동안 과도한 온실가스배출로 인한 기후변화에 의한 지구환경위기는 지구상 모든 인간에게 인간생활의 모든 문제를 환경문제와 연관시켜 생각하지 않을 수 없게 하고 있다. 산업활동에 있어서 기업에 대한 환경규제는 현행 산업 및 환경관련법규에 상세하게 규정되어 있다. 예컨대 환경정책기본법 제5조가 규정하는 사업자의 환경적 책무, 대기환경보전법 제16조가 규정하는 대기오염 배출시설의 배출허용기준, 저탄소녹색성장기본법 제6조의 사업자의 녹색경영 책무 등과 같은 것이다. 기업을 경영하기 위해서는 이와 같은 환경법상의 환경규제를 준수하지 않을 수 없게 되었다. 또한 국제거래에서 자국 물품에 대한 보호는 물론 환경적 악영향을 줄이기 위해서도 각종 국제환경규약 또는 양자간 FTA에서의 환경규제기준의 준수를 요구한다. EU역내 국가에 자동차를 수출하기 위해서는 EU집행위원회가 계속 발표하는 자동차배출가스 허용기준을 충족하는 자동차를 생산해야 하는 것이다. 어떠한 산업활동으로 배출되는 온실가스규제나 각종 물품에 대해 적용되는 환경규제는 당해기업의 생산활동에 관해서 매우 큰 영향을 미친다. 그것은 판매에 대한 진입장벽이 될 수도 있고 생산원가의 상승으로 인한 가격 경쟁력 상실이 될 수도 있다. 이제 기업경영에 있어 환경문제를 도외시하고 이기적 이윤추구만을 할 수 없게 되었다. 녹색경영은 기업의 윤리경영, 사회적 책임, 환경정의의 문제와도 관련된다. 환경경영, 녹색경영은 곧바로 기업의 이윤추구와도 배치되지 않고 부합된다. 국내는 물론 국제적으로도 기업경영과 무역에 있어서 환경법적 규제는 이제 피해 갈 수 없는 하나의 조건이다. 이제 환경경영은 기업 윤리경영의 한 내포로 자리매김하고 있다. 이러한 사실은 이 논문에서 살펴 본 현행 산업 및 환경관련법의 사업자에 대한 각종 환경규제와 지원제도에서 충분히 인식될 수 있다. 다만, 규제위주인 현행법제는 친환경농업육성법 및 신에너지 및 재생에너지의 생산·보급·이용촉진에 관한 법률에서 보는 바와 같이 보다 지원·유도적인 법제도 늘려 병행하는 입법적 전환이 필요하다. Humans have relied on fossil fuels to produce necessities for their survival from chemical fertilizers and agricultural machinery for food production to factories and transportation. In the course of human activities, they have produced enormous greenhouse gas emissions, which has led to climate change. The environmental crisis triggered by climate change has become an imminent challenge to everyone living on earth, and thereby made them think of any and all problems they face in relation to the environment. With respect to Industrial activities in Korea, environmental regulations on enterprises are specified by environmental laws. For example, Article 5 of the Framework Act on Environmental Policy dictates obligations of business operators, and Article 16 of the Clean Air Conservation Act stipulates permissible emission levels of air pollutants emitted from air pollutant emission facilities. Without abiding by the foregoing environmental regulation, no one is allowed to operate any business governed by the laws. In addition, many countries require observing environmental regulations in the international trade in order to protect domestic products and minimize negative influences on the environment. To export cars to a EU member country, for instance, the cars must be met by the tailpipe emissions standards established by the EU Commission. As such, regulations on greenhouse gas emissions or environmental regulations on manufactured products have significant impact on the business activities of related companies. The regulations may either serve as a barrier to entry into the industry, or increase manufacturing costs which may undermine companies` competitiveness and eventually force them to stop the production. Those who operate businesses should not blindly follow their own interest, ignoring environmental issues. Although green management has become a buzz word in the corporate management, it cannot be left solely to the market. This is also associated with ethical management and environmental justice. Environmental management and green management do not contradict companies` profit-seeking activities, but closely relate to them. Internationally as well as domestically, observing environmental laws and regulations is a prerequisite to corporate management and international trade. Thus, environmental management has become a significant part of ethical corporate management. This has been sufficiently recognized and discussed by this paper that examined current environmental laws and regulations on business operators.

영국의 소음규제 법제

이은기 ( Eun Gi Lee ) 한국환경법학회 2009 環境法 硏究 Vol.31 No.3

소음은 우리 일상생활의 결과이면서도 청력손상, 수면장애, 불쾌감 등으로 생활환경을 악화시키는 요소이다. 소음에 대한 반응은 매우 주관적이며 다른 환경오염형태와는 달리 독이 되지는 않으며 피해가 축적되지는 않는다. 영국은 1800년대부터 소음에 관한 많은 판례가 축적되었고 불문법국가임에도 적지 않은 실정법을 통해 적절한 행정적·사법적 규제를 해 왔는바, 소음규제 및 소음피해구제에 있어서는 매우 선진적이다. 영국의 소음규제법규로는 환경보전법(EPA), 피해구제법(COPA), 소음법(NA), 소음·법정불법방해법(NSNA), 건물규정, 실행지침 등 수많은 법령이 있다. 생활소음에 대해 불만이 제기되면 지방행정기관이나 지역의회가 신속하게 소음배제통지를 하고 이를 준수하지 않으면 형사범죄가 됨은 물론 사적 불법방해를 넘어 공적 불법방해까지도 성립할 수 있다. 경범법원(magistrates` court)에의 불복절차, 지역법원(district court) 등 각 심급법원에의 사법절차를 통하여 사전적·사후적 구제를 하고 있다. 영국소음규제법제의 법정불법방해(Statutory Noise Nuisance), 소음배제통지(Noise Abatement Notice)제도, 건축공사장소음에 대한 사전 동의제(Prior Consent), 건물규정(Building Regulations) 등에서의 집단주택의 이웃 및 층간 소음규제 등 세밀하게 다양한 형식의 규제를 하고 있으며 법원의 금지명령(Injunction)에 의한 피해의 최소화를 꾀하고 있다. 위와 같은 행정적 규제와 함께 보통법의 법정불법방해법제에 의한 영국의 소음피해배상방식은 아직도 행정적 구제보다는 사후적 민사구제에 의존하고 있는 우리의 소음규제법제에도 많은 시사를 주고 있다. I have been concerned about noise problem for a long time, since I have so acute sense of hearing as to be sensitive to a slight noise. Sensitivity and subjectivity of individual are the distinctiveness relating to noise problems. This article concerns English noise regulation system and lots of noise related cases to introduce it in our country. UK has developed noise related case-law and regulative legislations since 1800`s. This article explores the method to deal with various aspects of noise disturbance in England. They approach noise problems by means of common law`s private nuisance and public nuisance. A public nuisance is both a tort and a criminal offence. For one example, the Attorney General may seek an injunction to prevent a public nuisance. They have main statutory provisions which relate to noise such as Control of Pollution Act 1974, Environmental Protection Act 1990, Noise and Statutory Nuisance Act 1993, Noise Act 1996 and etc. Section 80 of the EPA 1990 provides that an authority must serve an Abatement Notice on the person responsible when a statutory nuisance exists or likely to occur. I think those system stated above are available and useful to prevent adverse noise in advance in England. And they use the grant of planning permission to minimize the adverse effect of noise in the course of development. UK`s court has held a lot of decisions on noise problem according to the principles of common law. I introduced those decisions from time to time in this article to understand English mechanism of noise pollution problems. In conclusion, there are very desirable types of noise regulations such as Noise Abatement Notice, Statutory Noise Nuisance, Building Regulations concerning to neighbourhood noise problem and Prior Consent system at construction site in UK. They give us lots of learnable suggestions. I suggest to introduce such regulative legislations to heighten environmental quality of our life. I think that is one of shortcuts to achieve "the Green Growth" which is Korean government`s catch phrase.

공법교육에서의 이론교육과 실무교육의 조화

이은기(Eun Gi Lee),김용섭(토론자) 서강대학교 법학연구소 2008 서강법학 Vol.10 No.2

법학전문대학원의 구조조정 등에 관한 소고 ― 경쟁에 의한 정원의 자율조정, 야간로스쿨 설립과 변호사시험의 자격시험으로의 운용을 위한 제언 ―

이은기 ( Lee Eun Gi ) 연세대학교 법학연구원 2019 法學硏究 Vol.29 No.2

2009년 법학전문대학원이 출범한지도 어느덧 10년이 지났다. 우리보다 5년 먼저 로스쿨제도를 도입한 일본에서는 74개 로스쿨 중 37개교가 이미 폐교하였고 그 숫자는 점점 늘고 있다. 우리 로스쿨제도는 출범 당시는 물론 운영과정에서 법치주의에 어긋난 교육행정이 여러 면에서 노정되었다. 법전원법은 법전원의 설치인가 및 폐지·변경인가의 절차에 대해서만 위임했음에도 ‘법학전문대학원의 설치인가 등에 있어서 지방대학의 발전과 지역균형을 고려하여야 한다’고 규정한 시행령 제5조는 모법에서 수권(위임)하지 않은 사항을 규정하고 있는바, 위임의 범위를 일탈한 내용을 규정한 것으로서 위법 무효이다. 우리 대법원 판례는 일관하여 모법에 없는 사항을 시행령에서 규정하거나 포괄적 위임은 위법무효라고 판시해 오고 있다. 시행령 제5조에 기하여 2008년 교육부는 로스쿨 인가시 지방대에 지역경제상황과 변호사수요를 고려하지 않고 지방거점대인 부산대, 경북대, 전남대, 충남대 등에 입학정원을 과다 배정하였다. 지역균형발전을 위하여 배정한 취지에 부합하기 위해서는 지방대 로스쿨 졸업생들에게는 최소한의 한시적인 개업지 제한(예컨대 졸업한 로스쿨 소재 광역지자체내 지역에서 2-3년 또는 5년 근무)이라도 해야 하는바, 그러한 제한조차 두지 않고 있다. 그 결과 지방대 로스쿨을 졸업하고 변호사시험에 합격한 대다수 졸업생들이 서울 등 수도권으로 올라와 취업하거나 개업하도록 방치하였다. 그 결과 입학정원의 50%인 1,000명을 지방대에 할당한 지역균형발전 이념을 몰각시키고 있다. 현재 로스쿨의 재정적 취약성을 감안하여 계속 연장하여 2020년까지 시행 예정인 결원보충제는 경쟁원리를 왜곡시키고 당해 로스쿨이 감수해야 할 부분을 국가가 나서서 제도적으로 보완해 줌으로서 로스쿨 상호간 경쟁이 없는 무풍지대로 만드는 것으로서 폐지되어야 한다. 법전원법 제25조에서 허용된 편입학제도가 실제로는 금지되고 있다. 그 결과 원래 입학한 로스쿨에서 1년을 수학하고 다시 입학시험을 쳐서 타 로스쿨에 1학년으로 입학하는 비경제적인 현상이 계속되고 있다. 지방대 법학전문대학원들이 카르텔을 형성, 편입학을 반대하여 이를 시행하지 못함으로써 법치주의가 실종된 비법률적 행태이다. 법치행정을 해야 하는 주무부서인 교육부는 방관하고 있으나, 강력한 행정지도로 법치주의를 회복해야 한다. 법전원법 제26조는 ‘학생구성의 다양성’이라는 제하에 입학정원 중 비법학사1/3이상, 타교 학부출신 1/3이상을 선발하도록 강제함으로써 법전원의 학생구성을 인위적으로 통제하고 있다(Command & Control). 이러한 제도는 입시에서의 대학 자율성과 자유경쟁원리에 반하므로 법을 개정하여 폐지하거나 그 비율을 축소해야 한다. 그 밖에 사법시험의 폐지로 인한 부작용을 줄이기 위해 야간로스쿨을 설립하고 변시낭인을 줄이기 위해 변호사시험을 자격시험으로 운용하는 등 10년 경험에서 노정된 불합리한 제도들을 시급히 손질해야 한다. 이러한 문제는 법관과 검사의 선발 등 인사행정과도 밀접하게 관련되는 ‘사법정책 및 법무행정’의 일환이다. 이 글에서는 법학전문대학원의 지속적 발전을 위해 자유경쟁에 의한 자율적 구조 조정 등 여러 가지 제도적 개선책을 제시해 보았다. 우리나라에서도 일본의 전철을 밟지 않으려면 이러한 문제에 대해 교육부, 법무부, 사법정책연구원, 대한변협, 법전원협의회, 법학교수회 등 유관기관들이 협력하여 진지한 사회적 논의를 해야 한다. It has been ten years since Law Schools were launched in 2009 modeled after American Law School. In Japan, which introduced the law school system five years before Korea, 37 out of 74 Law Schools have closed down and this number is still increasing. The Korean Law School System was exposed to various educational administrative systems that fell against rule of law not only at its introduction, but also during the course of its operation. In the Act on the Establishment and Management of Professional Law Schools (hereinafter called Law School Act), the enforcement ordinance prescribed considerations for the development of local universities and regional balance despite it not being consigned. Despite the fact that the Law School Act delegates only the procedures of authorization for establishment, closure and modification of law schools, Article 5 of the Enforcement Ordinance prescribes that ’in authorization of establishment, etc. of Law Schools, development of local universities and regional balance must be considered’. This prescribes a matter not delegated from the parent law and it prescribes matters in deviation of the scope of delegation, and is therefore illegal and invalid. Previous case rulings of the Korean Supreme Court has precedence that prescribing matters in the enforcement ordinance that is not in the parent law is invalid. Pursuant to Article 5 of the enforcement ordinance, the Ministry of Education assigned excessive entrance quotas for major regional universities such as Pusan National University, Kyungpook National University, Chonnam National University and Chungnam National University without considering the local economic situation for law schools of local universities while accrediting Law Schools. This is not delegated by the parent law and therefore, it is based on the invalid Article 5 and 6 of the enforcement ordinance and thus poses a problem. In order to meet the goal of assignment for regionally balanced development in the above ordinance, it was necessary to at least temporarily limit place of practices (i.e., be required to work within the area of jurisdiction of the law school they graduated from) for graduates of local university law schools, but it did not place such limitations. In result, most graduates who graduated from law schools in other regions and passed the bar exam moved to the Seoul region to find employment or open their law firm. This resulted in disregarding the ideology of regionally balanced development that assigned 1,000 persons, 50% of the Law School entrance quota, to Law Schools of local universities. The vacancy-filling system resulting from drop-outs, etc. that is being temporarily executed and extended to 2020 considering the financial vulnerability of Law Schools not only distorts the principle of free competition, but basically serves as systematically supporting failed competition of law schools. When a failure that should be shouldered by the law school is systematically supplemented by the state, it creates a free-zone without competition among law schools, which poses as a problem and should be abolished. Law School Act Article 25 Paragraph 1 states, “A professional law school student may transfer to another professional law school, as prescribed by school regulations” and the allowed transfer system is in reality prohibited. In result, students who were admitted to a Law School study for a year at that school and then takes another law school aptitude examination and entrance test to become admitted at another law school as a new student, thus making this uneconomic reality continue to go on. This acts as a barrier to fair and free competition and it is in an unlawful form where constitutionalism is missing in law schools, whose goal is to foster practitioners of law. The Ministry of Education, which is the ministry in charge of educational administration and that should engage in constitutional administration, is also just looking on without doing anything. Law School Act Article 26 states ‘Diversity of Student Bodies’. Therefore, it artificially commands and controls student bodies of the Law School Act by forcing the selection of 1/3 or more undergraduates from majors other than law and 1/3 or more from undergraduate schools of other universities from its admissions quota. This system is in opposition to the autonomy and free competition principles for entry into graduate schools, and therefore, the law should be revised promptly and be abolished. To further reduce side effects resulting from the abolition of the judicial examination, nighttime law schools were established and law aptitude examinations, credit transfer systems of electives, operation of eligibility tests of bar exams, subject passing systems, and other systems that displayed side effects over the past 10 years should also be addressed promptly. This problem is ‘part of judicial policy and prosecutor administration’ closely related to the personnel administration in selecting judges and prosecutors such as how to select persons with what kind of education, how to educate them after selection and where to assign them in courts and prosecutor’s office etc. Systematic reform measures were suggested such as autonomous restructuring according to free competition for the sustainability of professional law schools. In order for Korea not to follow in the footsteps of Japan, the Ministry of Education, Ministry of Justice, the Judicial Policy Research Institute, Korean Bar Association, and the Korean Association of Law Schools should cooperate in reforms for sustainable law school structures and engage in sincere social discussions.

지방자치단체의 고충민원해결제도

이은기(Eun Gi Lee) 한국지방자치법학회 2007 지방자치법연구(地方自治法硏究) Vol.7 No.1

현대복지행정국가에서 시민들의 행정에 대한 불평・불만은 점증하고 있다. 지방자치제도는 민주주의의 근간이고 옴부즈맨제도는 지방자치행정의 감시・통제기관으로서 민주주의와 법치행정주의의 실현기구의 하나로 기능을 한다. 중앙정부 및 지방자치단체의 행정에 대한 구제절차는 여러 가지가 있는바, 사전적 절차로는 행정절차, 청원, 국민고충처리위원회 등 각종 고충처리 민원제도를, 사후적 절차로는 행정심판, 행정소송 등 행정쟁송이 있다. 그러므로 지방자치행정에 대한 민원해결제도로서 헌법 및 청원법에 의해 인정되는 청원, 행정절차, 고충처리위원회제도 등을 들 수 있다. 여기서는 스웨덴의 옴부즈맨제도를 본 따 만든 국민고충처리위원회와 대비되는 제도로서 새로 도입된 지방주민의 고충민원 처리를 위한 시민고충처리위원회를 2005년 제정된 국민고충처리위원회의 설치 및 운영에 관한 법률 을 토대로 두 위원회의 조직구성, 임기, 재임용 등 업무영역 등에 관한 차이를 비교하여 입법론상의 문제점을 살펴본다. 시민고충처리위원회는 국민고충처리위원회에 비해 업무영역(관할권)이 지방자치단체의 행정에 한정되는데다가 무엇보다도 법상 임의적 설치기구라는데 문제가 있다. 그 결과 시민고충처리위원회는 그 기능을 제대로 발휘할 수 없는 태생적 한계를 지니고 있으므로 조속한 시일내로 법개정을 통해서 국민고충처리위원회와 같이 의무적 설치기관화 함으로써 실효성을 기해야 할 것으로 본다. Nowadays the number of citizen s complaints and petitions to administration is rapidly increasing in modem administrative welfare states year by year. Local autonomy is a fundamental in modem democracy. There are lots of systems for correcting various wrong and illegal administrative agency s actions including central government and local self-governing body. For example, there are administrative procedure, petitions to assembly, ombudsman, administrative litigation and etc. This article aims to study on the resolution system of local resident s complaints and petitions in local autonomy in comparison to national resolution system in Korea. We have two sorts of systems of settling any civil complaints and petitions derived from the Swedish system named Ombudsman . in Korea. One is the national ombudsman, named Kookminkochungcheoriwiwonwhi for all nationwide citizens. The other is the local ombudsman, named Siminkochungcheoriwiwonwhi for regional residents. The latter is narrower than the former in jurisdiction. The latter s jurisdiction is limited to its ruling region while that of the former is nationwide. They are applied by the same related law of 2005. However, there is a discrimination between the latter and the former in organization, member, term of membership, reappointment possibility and so on. It is at issue that the latter is at local self-government s discretion in its establishment. In a word it is optional institution So the latter couldn t and won t fulfill its function appropriately now Finally it is necessary to revise the related law in the near future to improve that system The latter is also to be compulsorily established by law as like the former. That s a short way to vitalize the latter for the regional residents.

환경법의 과학적 전문성에 관한 소고 -지식기반 환경법학의 구축을 위한 시론-

이은기 ( Eun Gi Lee ) 한국환경법학회 2008 環境法 硏究 Vol.30 No.3

Basically, environmental law has science-based nature of, especially, natural science, for example, chemistry, biology, physics, geology, pharmacology, medical science and etc. On the other hand, environmental law indirectly relates to cultural-social sciences, for example, economics, business, sociology, philosophy, sociology, ethics, geography, theology and etc. For example, when it comes to the relation between ethics and environmental law, environmental regulation by law raises ethical questions relating to our obligation to future generation. The areas of `environmental justice` or `environmental racism` focus on the growing concern that environmental regulations impose disproportionate adverse impacts on the poor or on racial or ethnic minorities. So if we deduct the frame of legal part from environmental law, maybe the contents of natural, cultural-social scientific factors will be left. In this article, I tried to build a researching methodology of knowledge-based environmental law to extend the horizon of researching environmental law by taking the method of convergence and harmony between lots of natural, cultural, social sciences and environmental law. I almost studied our country`s environment-related statutes at the viewpoint of that. We, as a researcher of environmental law, have to take an interdisciplinary research with above-mentioned natural scientists, cultural scientists, and social scientists considering science-based nature of environmental law.

환경법의 교육방법론 소고 -미국,캐나다,일본의 로스쿨과 비교하여-

이은기 ( Eun Gi Lee ) 한국환경법학회 2007 環境法 硏究 Vol.29 No.1

Nowadays seriousness caused by earth climate change, destruction of ecosystem, pollution of air, water, land and sea, protection of natural resources, regulation of toxic substances, hazardous wastes and nuclear wastes, international trade regulatory policy change by environmental standards makes human-being realize importance of environment. Thinking environment is our duty. To study environmental law, we have to know more about natural science and social science. It is the reason to need interdisciplinary research to study and teach environmental law. Importance of environmental law is increasing more and more. Nevertheless environmental law is a so-called non-important subject to law students. In this article I try to study on teaching methodology of Environmental Law. At first I explore the curricula and teaching method of environmental law at Korean university and several foreign universities, especially American Law School, Canadian Law School and Japanese Law School which is newly established. And then I research the teaching methodology. American Law School is the model of anglo-american law system. So we have to learn a lot of things from their system. But we don`t have to simply resemble their system ignoring our unique tradition and conditions. American Law Schools have lots of diverse relevant elective courses and seminars on environmental law. Especially Lewis and Clark Law School has more than 40 of environmental subjects. They use socratic method, case-problem method, team teaching, role play(simulation), internship, extern ship as a teaching method. If we choose law school system, we can not avoid of resembling american law school`s teaching method like Japan.

하수처리 : 하천수 재이용을 위한 규조토 여과기의 현장 적용성 평가

이은기 ( Eun Gi Lee ),김효식 ( Hyo Sik Kim ),최상일 ( Sang Il Choi ),한규남 ( Gyu Nam Han ) 한국물환경학회 ( 구 한국수질보전학회 ) 2007 공동 추계학술발표회 Vol.2007 No.-