http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 윤철호 (검색결과 433 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
-
-
-
윤철호 장로회신학대학교 장로회신학대학교 2009 장신논단 Vol.0 No.34
The purpose of this work is to envision the sermon in the church which is based on appropriate biblical interpretation in the comtemporary situation. That is, the main concern of this work is hermeneutical. For this purpose or concern, the following themes are investigated. ① Reformers' understanding of the Scripture and sermon, ② The homiletics of Karl Barth, ③ Buttrick's view on the relation between the Scripture and sermon, ④ The gospel of the Bible and sermon, ⑤ Biblical interpretation and sermon: narrative critique and narrative sermon. It cannot be a matter of choosing between the two whether the starting point of sermon should be the Biblical text as Barth insists or it should be the situation and experience of congregation as Schleiermacher and some contemporary theologians insist. There can be no definite rule regarding this issue. Preachers are free in deciding the starting point of their own sermon. One of the important factors for reference in the decision is the character of the congregation which is in the variety of spectrum. Today's congregation requires more dialogical and reciprocal structure of communication than authoritarian and unilateral one which is the characteristics of the traditional sermon. The fundamental reason why the question of selecting one alternative as to the starting point of sermon is misplaced one is that the two, the Scriptural text and situation, are in the inseparable correlation of hermeneutical circle. That is to say, we always interpret the Scriptural text in terms of the situation and vice versa. Sermon in an practical activity performed at the end point of the hermeneutical arch which bridges the exegesis of Scriptural text from the past and the application of it in the present. The construction of sermon itself is a hermeneutical work which mediates the biblical interpretation and the application of it. Surely, every sermon should be biblical in order that it may be Christian sermon. This, however, does not mean that sermon should be under biblical authoritarianism. Biblical and evangelical sermon does not reject the process of critical and hermeneutical understanding of the Scriptural text but requires it. The narrative sermon which is in the limelight recent days also can and should incorporate this critical and hermeneutical process of understanding the Scriptural text.
-
-
-
-
윤철호 한국조직신학회 2019 한국조직신학논총 Vol.54 No.-
The purpose of this article is to investigate the methodology of Rudolf Bultmann’s theology in relation to Martin Heidegger’s philosophy. In this article, I will argue that Bultmann uses Heidegger’s philosophy for the analysis of human existence, but is not dependent on or subject to his philosophy. With this view, I will examine in terms of methodology the characteristics of Bultmann’s theology which is distinguished from Heidegger’s philosophy as well as the influence of Heidegger’s philosophy on Bultmann’s theology. First, the main contents of Heidegger philosophy are outlined. And the relationship between the theology of Bultmann and the philosophy of Heidegger is investigated. Then we analyze Bultmann’s theological methodology. Finally, his theological methodology is evaluated. The evaluation of Bultmann’s theological methodology is summarized in two ways. First, Bultmann on the one hand presupposes a particular philosophical (dualistic) world view not derived from faith, and on the other hand rejects the natural theology which recognizes the inevitability of a conceptual premise and claims to support pure revelatory theology. The philosophical thought that the world is closed to God and that faith has nothing to do with the objective world view has a very important function of preunderstanding in the Bultmann’s theological methodology, which betrays that he depends on the method of natural theology just which he rejects. Second, Bultmann presupposes as a self-evident axiom the modern dualist world view in which the objective world is closed to transcendent God’s actions. In today’s postmodern scientific world view, however, the concept of the universal spirit or the transcendent participating in and interacting with the process of this world can be understood as a philosophical concept with intelligibility. This concept can resonate with the concept of God in the Bible, who dynamically participates in human and world history and leads its history in mutual relations. 이 글의 목적은 루돌프 불트만의 신학 방법론을 마르틴 하이데거의철학과의 관계를 중심으로 고찰하는데 있다. 이 글에서 필자는 불트만이 인간 실존의 분석을 위해 하이데거의 철학을 사용하지만 하이데거의 철학에 의존하거나 종속되지는 않는다는 관점을 가지고, 불트만의 신학이 하이데거의 철학으로부터 받은 영향과 하이데거의철학과 구별되는 불트만의 신학의 특징을 방법론에 대한 관심을 가지고 고찰한다. 먼저 하이데거 철학의 주요 내용을 개관한다. 그리고 불트만의 신학과 하이데거의 철학 사이의 관계를 고찰한다. 그 다음에 불트만의 신학 방법론을 분석한다. 그리고 마지막으로 그의 신학 방법론을 평가한다. 불트만의 신학 방법론에 대한 평가는 다음 두 가지로 요약된다. 첫째, 불트만은 한편으로는 신앙으로부터 유래하지 않는 특정한철학적(이원론적) 세계관을 전제하고 있으면서, 다른 한편으로는 어떤 개념적 전제의 불가피성을 인정하는 자연신학을 거부하고 순수한 계시신학을 표방한다. 세계가 하나님에 대해 닫혀 있으며 신앙은객관적 세계관과 아무런 관련이 없다는 철학적 사고는 불트만의 신학 방법론에 있어서 매우 중요한 전이해의 기능을 하는데, 이것은 불트만이 바로 자신이 거부하는 자연신학의 방법론에 의존하고 있음을 드러낸다. 둘째, 불트만은 객관적 세계가 초월적 하나님의 행동에 대해 닫혀 있다는 근대적인 이원론적 세계관을 자명한 공리처럼 전제한다. 그러나 오늘날의 탈근대적인 과학적 세계관에서는 이 세계의 과정에 참여하고 그 과정과 상호작용하는 우주적 정신 또는 초월자 개념이 이해가능한 철학적 개념이 될 수 있다. 그리고 이 개념은 인간과 세계의 역사 안에 역동적으로 참여하시고 상호적 관계성 안에서 그 역사를 이끌어 가시는 성서에 나타나는 하나님 개념과의 공명이 가능하다.
-
윤철호,김상훈 한국경영과학회 2004 한국경영과학회지 Vol.29 No.3
This paper focused on empirically testing the ESM(Electronic-Store Success Model). The model was developed by basing upon the 'Updated D&M(DeLone and McLean) IS Success Model(2003)' and reflecting the characteristics of marketing and e-business, and composed of the six dimensions including system quality, information quality, service quality, trust, customer loyalty and financial performance. The research model consisting of five dimensions. excluding financial performance, was proposed and empirically verified by structural equation model with respect to data from 224 customers on 69 Electronic-Stores. The results show that system quality and information quality significantly influence service quality, and that service quality also significantly Influence trust and customer loyalty, and that trust has significant Influence on customer loyalty.
-
ScienceON연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
