관동대지진 조선인학살 진상규명을 위한 한일 시민의 노력과 과제

성주현(成周鉉) 동북아역사재단 2023 동북아 역사 포커스 Vol.- No.6

조선총독부 관료의 구술기록을 통해 본 참정권 문제

성주현(Sung, Joo-Hyun)(成周鉉) 한일민족문제학회 2020 한일민족문제연구 Vol.38 No.-

This article explores the issue of the right to vote in the late 1930s in Korea and how the right to vote was perceived through dictation by the Governor-General’s Bureaucrats. The issue of suffrage in the Korean colony was raised while referring to the Japanese government’s colonial policy based on the principle of “extension of remote areas” immediately after the 3.1 movement, but the Japanese government maintained the early trend of the Korean people’s livelihood as they did not reach a certain level. The suffrage issue, which had been at rest since then, reappeared after the Manchuria Incident in 1931. The issue of the right to vote was raised after careful discussion of the draft system of the Korean people, and the People’s Coalition for Participation, the Jochu, and the Koshien Ministry launched a campaign for the draft system and linked it with the right to vote for the right to vote in the anti-parceleratory payoff of the draft system. Nevertheless, Japan’s position is still premature and is reluctant to grant suffrage. The claim for the deployment of the draft system was raised again as the front line was expanded in the 1937 Sino-Japanese War, and the issue of the right to vote was raised again. The Japanese government and the Korean governor’s office tried to use the issue of suffrage as a means of mobilizing war. On the other hand, colonial bureaucrats did not have a positive view of the suffrage issue. It predicted that there will be a natural suffrage issue based on the slogan of equality and extension of the remote area. Some people were negative about granting the right to vote for North Koreans, but there was no doubt that the issue of the right to vote would be solved by itself if the draft system were put into force. However, the draft system was actually introduced through the volunteer system, but the issue of suffrage remains a problem. This was due to the Japanese government’s colonial policy of separating the issue of military service, namely conscription and suffrage. The draft system will be implemented, but the right to vote will not be granted. The Japanese government maintained its position that it was too early to give up the right to vote because of the low popularity of North Korea. However, colonial officials and the Japanese government have taken seriously the concern that if they grant the right to vote, they will lose the casting boat.In these points, we can see that although the “democracy” was mentioned on the surface, the major factor was the “casting boat.” 本稿は、1930年代後半の植民地朝鮮で展開された参政権の問題とその延 長線上から続く徵兵制について朝鮮総督府官僚の口述を介して参政権につい てどのように認識したのか調べてみた。 植民地朝鮮で参政権問題は3.1運動直後、日本政府の｢內地延長主義｣ を踏まえた植民政策に言及しながら提起されたが、日本政府は、朝鮮の民度 がまだ一定の水準に達していなかったので、時機尙早という基調を一貫して維 持した。以降小康状態にあった参政権問題は、1931年満州事変に展示システ ム基形成され、再び台頭した。慎重に朝鮮人の徴兵制についての議論が提 起され参政権問題は、新たに浮上され國民協會、時中會、甲子俱樂部は徵 兵制要望運動を展開しながら、これを参政権と連携させたいた、すなわち徴兵 制の反對給付に参政権を要求したものだった。それにもかかわらず、日本の立 場はまだ時期尚早を打ち出して参政権付与に消極的に対応している。1937年 日中戦争で戦線が拡大されることによって徴兵制実施を要求する主張が再び 提起され、このかみ合っ参政権問題も再び提起された。日本政府や朝鮮総督 府は、参政権の問題を事実上の戦争動員の手段として利用しようとした。 一方、参政権問題についての植民地官僚は、肯定的な認識もなかった。 一視同仁と內地延長主義をスローガンにする自然参政権問題が発生するものと見た。一部では、朝鮮人の参政権付与は否定的だったが、徴兵制が施行さ れれば参政権問題は自然に解決されると考えもなくはなかった。しかしながら実 際に志願兵制度を経て徴兵制が実施されたが参政権問題は依然として課題と して残った。これは、日本政府の兵役義務つまり徴兵制と参政権の問題を徹底 的に分離する植民地政策をとるたからであった。徴兵制は実施するが参政権は 付与しないというものである。 日本政府は、参政権を付与していない本質的な原因は、朝鮮の民度が低 いということで、まだ時期尚早という立場を固守した。しかしながら植民地官僚や 日本政府は参政権を付与した場合、｢キャスティングボートを奪われることができ るという憂慮｣を真剣に受け入れた。これらの点は、これまで参政権問題は、｢民 度｣は表面的に掲げたが、実質的には｢キャスティングボート｣が主要な要因で あったことを知ることができる。

보은·금구집회의 전개와 동학농민혁명

성주현(Sung, Ju-hyeon) 忠北大學校 中原文化硏究所 2013 중원문화연구 Vol.21 No.-

경기지역 동학혁명과 동학군의 참여과정

성주현 수원문화사연구회 2005 수원문화사연구 Vol.7 No.-

보은 ‧ 금구집회의 전개와 동학농민혁명

성주현 충북대학교 중원문화연구소 2013 중원문화연구총서 Vol.21 No.-

본문참고

플라톤(Platon)의 體育觀이 現代에 미친 影響

成周鉉 濟州敎育大學校 1983 論文集 Vol.13 No.-

Platon is one of few philosophers interested in gymnastic and pointed out some problems of it. Ⅰ. then, retrospect his views to the modern gymnastic. He told excellents comments and advices on the gymnastic in his many books. Body structure which is basis of gymnastic, mutual relation between body and mind, problems of gymnastic as a branch of teachings that exist with music at the sane tine. Gymnastic concerning to provide the beaders as an usher constructing ideal polis, Surveillance of gymnastic essence and suggestions on the purposes of it. Handling gymnastic according to the ages and sexes, and also suggestions on theaching method in accordance with steps pradually, Those are all the same that the modern gymnastic handles. 1. His suggestions on surveillance of human and essence of gymnastic gives so much effects and advices to the circumstances of today's gymnastic. 2. He establishes the proper position of gymnastic in his teaching-philosophy as a method of constructing ideal-polis. 3. He anticipates the balanced person in body and mind including stress on the persondity, debating the fact that gymnastic is inclined to the mass-discipline. 4. He warns that human might become impo tent stress on mental experience otherwise fierce if body-trainning. He, therefore, insist to teach both properly. Platon's opinious on gymnastic are the same as today in its essence, wntents and methods, even though he agreed that time and nationality is another factor of differences. We can conclude that those would be the excellent philosophy of gymnastic if we rearrange those comparing to modern senses.

도로교통소음 노출과 소음 감수성 및 소음 불쾌감의 관련성

성주현,박상진,윤석현,이지호,심창선 대한직업환경의학회 2016 대한직업환경의학회 학술대회 논문집 Vol.2016 No.11

도심지 토사재해 점검을 위한 정기점검 및 긴급점검 항목 개발

성주현 ( Seong Joo Hyun ),정민형 ( Jung Min Hyung ) 한국구조물진단유지관리공학회 2017 한국구조물진단유지관리공학회 학술발표대회 논문집 Vol.21 No.1

The purpose of this study is to develope items for regular and emergent inspections in order to prevent a debris flow in urban areas. Preliminary evaluation items which are matched with urban characteristic were derived by Literature review and first survey of the Delphi technique. It is expected that final items for regular and emergent inspections are developed by additional surveys of the Delphi technique.

공동구 활성화를 위한 현황 분석 연구

성주현 ( Seong Joo-hyun ),정민형 ( Jung Min-hyung ),서정은 ( Seo Jeong-eun ),이유석 ( Lee Yu-seok ),최병일 ( Choi Byoung-il ) 한국구조물진단유지관리공학회 2020 한국구조물진단유지관리공학회 학술발표대회 논문집 Vol.24 No.1

최근 빈번한 노후 지하매설물 관련 사고로 인해 공동구의 효용성 및 필요성이 증대되고 있어, 공동구 활성화를 통한 통합관리의 필요성이 제기되고 있다. 현행 공동구 200만㎡ 이상의 대규모 개발 사업(국토계획법)에 설치되도록 규정되어 있으며, 국내는 30개소의 공동구가 설치되어 운영 중에 있다. 본 연구에서는 국내/외 공동구 설치 현황을 검토하고, 공동구의 운영 및 관리 현황을 분석하여 공동구 활성화를 위해 필요한 사항을 도출하였다.

박인호계의 동학혁명과 그 이후의 동향

성주현 동학학회 2009 동학학보 Vol.17 No.-

Park, In-Ho was born in February 1885 in Deoksan, Chungnam and entered Donghak earlier than 1883 to grow up as a central figure in the Naepo region and he led Donghak troops together with Park, Hee-In in the period of Donghak Revolution. The Donghak organization of Park, In-Ho group was formed centering on the Naepo region. After entering Donghak, Park, In-Ho propagated Donghak in the northeastern part of the Naepo region such as Onyang, Sinchang, Dangjin, Yesan etc centering on Deoksan as well as the southwestern part including Seosan, Haemi, Taean, Hongju and Nampo. Among these areas, Park, In-Ho formed Deokpo centering on the northeastern part and Park, Hee-In who entered Donghak through Park, In-Ho formed Yepo mainly centering on the southwestern part. However, these two forces can be considered as belonging to Park, In-Ho group in a wide meaning. The Donghak force in the Naepo region actively participated in the Remission Movement that had been developed from 1893. The Donghak Revolution of Park, In-Ho group began from Deoksan uprising and Wonbeol uprising and was actively developed throughout the Naepo region. The Donghak Revolution in Deoksan uprising was developed centering on Deokpo of Park, In-Ho and the Donghak Revolution in Wonbeol uprising was developed centering on Yepo of Park, Hee-In. Later, by the influence of Donghak Revolution in Honam region and pursuant to the decree for uprising of Haewol Choi, Si-Hyeong, a general mobilization order was issued in the Naepo region on the last day of October 1894. Park, In-Ho rose in Asan and seized the government office and Park, Hee-In rose in Seosan and Taean and seized government offices in these regions and rescued around 30 Donghak leaders who had been imprisoned. Later. after the Yepo stronghold of Park, Hee-In that had been established in Mokso-ri, Yesan was fallen at a sudden attack of the government troops on November 11, the Donghak troops of Park, In-Ho group that had been independently acting in the region to the northeast and in the region to the southwest from Haemi formed the united front with the Donghak troops of Park, Hee-In. After that, the Donghak troops of Park, In-Ho group that formed the united front defeated Japanese troops, government troops and the Confucian group troops in the Seungjeongok battle and the Sinlyewon battle and gathered in Hongju fortress. However, the Donghak troops of Park, In-Ho group was terribly defeated in the Hongju fortress battle and then repeatedly retreated and broke up becoming the subjects of subjugation by the government troops and the Confucian group troops. Not only major leaders of Donghak troops such as Park, In-Ho and Park, Hee-In but also all members of Donghak troops participated in Donghak Revolution had to hide themselves here and there to preserve their lives. Park, In-Ho wandered many places and settled in Jeongsan later. After Donghak Revolution, Park, In-Ho actively participated in rebuilding Donghak religious body and after Haewol Choi, Si-Hyeong died, he actively supported Euiam Son, Byeong-Hee contributing to establishing the religious body leading system. In the folk-group movement called 1904 Gapjin Civilization Innovation Movement, he served leading roles together with Hong, Byeong-Gi to organize Daedonghoe and Jungliphoe but he reacted passively thereafter when Lee, Yong-Gu took plenary power of the folk-group movement and organized Jinbohoe. And after the promulgation of Cheondogyo in 1905, he positioned himself as a core figure in the central association under the support of Son, Byeong-Hee and actively made efforts to change Cheondogyo into a modern religion. 박인호는 1885년 2월 충남 덕산에서 출생하여 1883년 이전 동학에 입도하여 내포지역의 중심인물로 성장하였으며, 동학혁명기에는 박희인과 함께 내포지역 동학군을 지도하였다. 박인호계의 동학조직의 형성은 내포지역을 중심으로 형성하였다. 박인호는 동학 입도 이후 덕산을 중심으로 온양, 신창, 당진, 예산 등 내포지역의 동북부뿐만 아니라 서산, 해미, 태안, 홍주, 남포 등 서남부지역까지 포교하였다. 이들 지역 중 박인호는 동북부를 중심으로 덕포를 형성하였고, 박인호를 통해 동학에 입도한 박희인은 주로 서남부지역을 중심으로 예포를 형성하였다. 그렇지만 이 두 세력은 넓은 의미에서는 박인호계에 속한다고 할 수 있다. 내포지역 동학세력은 1893년부터 전개되었던 교조신원운동에 적극 참여하였다. 박인호계의 동학혁명은 덕산기포와 원벌기포를 기점으로 내포지역 전역에서 활발하게 전개되었다. 덕산기포는 박인호의 덕포를 중심으로, 원벌기포는 박희인의 예포를 중심으로 전개되었다. 이후 호남지역의 동학혁명의 영향과 해월 최시형의 기포령에 따라 1894년 10월 그믐 내포지역에서는 총동원령이 내려졌다. 박인호는 아산에서 기포하여 관아를 점령하였으며, 박희인은 서산과 태안에서 기포하여 이들 지역의 관아를 점령하고 투옥된 동학지도자 30여 명을 구출하였다. 이후 해미를 경계로 동북부와 서남부지역에서 독자적으로 활동하던 박인호계 동학군은 11월 11일 예산 목소리에 설치되었던 박희인의 예포대도소가 관군의 기습으로 무너지면서 박인호계 동학군의 연합전선이 형성되었다. 이후 연합전선을 형성한 박인호계 동학군은 승전곡전투와 신례원전투에서 일본군, 관군, 유회군을 격파하고 홍주성에 집결하였다. 그러나 홍주성전투에서 대패한 박인호계 동학군은 후퇴와 해산을 거듭하면서 관군과 유회군의 토벌대상이 되었다. 박인호, 박희인 등 동학군 주요지도자뿐만 아니라 동학혁명 대열에 동참한 동학군은 각지에서 은신하면서 목숨을 보존할 수밖에 없었다. 박인호는 여러 곳을 전전하다가 정산에 정착하였다. 동학혁명 이후 박인호는 동학교단의 재건에 적극 참여하였으며, 해월 최시형 순도 이후에는 의암 손병희를 적극 지지하여 교단지도체제를 확립하는데 기여하였다. 1904년 갑진개화운동으로 불리는 민회운동에서는 대동회와 중립회를 결성하기까지 홍병기와 함께 주도적 역할을 하였지만, 이후 이용구가 민회운동의 전권을 맡아 진보회를 조직하면서부터는 소극적으로 대응하고 있다. 그리고 1905년 천도교의 대고 이후에는 손병희의 후원 아래 중앙총부의 핵심인물로 자리잡으면서 천도교를 근대적 종교로 탈바꿈시키는데 적극 노력하였다.