인문 · 사회과학편 : 전통무예의 현황과 과제에 관한 연구

나영일(YoungIlNa) 한국체육학회 1994 한국체육학회지 Vol.33 No.2

The purposes of this study was first, to clarify the substance of traditional martial arts and to find the status of it, second, to investigate the present conditions and the problems of it, third, to suggest the project of it.In order to meet the purposes of this study, researcher investigated and analyzed the records relating to the martial arts, interviewed with and questioned to the martial artists and the related persons.The results were as follows.Recently, eastern martial arts(named Muye 武藝, Musul 武術, and Mudo 武道) have used as the subject matter of physical education and as a means of sport or mental education and recognized and practiced widely by the general public. In 1992, 5,875 dojang(gym) was officially listed and named of matrial arts in various type. In this dojangs, the numbers of taekyondo dojang is the largest (63%), the second one is hapkido (16%), and imported martial arts dojang is 10%, and the others is 11%. Especially many of traditional martial arts except taekwyondo have been lain unsystematic conditions. We are confronted with many problems in traditional martial arts weakness in traditinalism, exhibitionism in one`s superiority, amphlified on the secret, unconsious japanism, hurriedly constructed philosophism, unconsidered commercialism, trying various change.So, to solve these problems, I recommand philosophizing, organizing, systemizing, and poupularizing of trational martial arts.

체육사 : 기효신서(紀效新書), 무예제보(武藝諸譜), 무예도보통지(武藝圖譜通志) 비교연구(比較硏究)

나영일(YoungIlNa) 한국체육학회 1997 한국체육학회지 Vol.36 No.4

본 연구는 《紀效新書》, 《武藝諸譜》, 《武藝圖譜通志》라는 무예사의 가장 지침이 되는 중국과 우리나라 무예서의 판본과 내용을 비교한 것이다. 판본과 내용비교를 통하여 《紀效新書》에서 《武藝諸譜》 그리고 《武藝圖譜通志》 가 나오기까지의 과정을 탐색하고, 이들간의 유사점이나 공통점 그리고 차이점을 발견하고 그 의미를 해석하고 고찰하였다. 내용비교시에는 국내외에 있는 《紀效新書》, 《武藝諸譜》, 《武藝圖譜通志》중에서 이들이 함께 담고 있는 6技에 대해서만 비교하였다.중국과 조선의 대표적인 무예서를 비교한 결과 다음과 같은 사실을 알았다.첫째, 《武藝諸譜》는 임진왜란이라는 시급한 때를 당하여 우리나라 무사들이 취약한 短兵武藝를 중심으로 《紀效新書》의 내용중에서 6技만을 골라 우리 것으로 만들기 위한 노력의 일환으로 이루어진 것이다. 《紀效新書》는 여러 판본이 있는데 《武藝諸譜》는 이중에서 王世貞이 서문을 쓴 1566년의 판본을 참조하였다.둘째, 《紀效新書》, 《武藝諸譜》, 《武藝圖譜通志》에 공통으로 보이는 6技의 내용을 비교해 보면, 《武藝諸譜》와 《武藝圖譜通志》의 6技는 내용은 동일하나 《紀效新書》보다 조선병사들이 이해하기 쉽게 설명과 그림을 적절히 표현하였다.셋째, 《武藝諸譜》와 달리 《武藝圖譜通志》는 《紀效新書》는 물론 《武備志》, 《龍飛御天歌》, 《刀劍錄》, 《倭志》 등 145가지의 수많은 문헌들을 참고로 24技라는 다양한 무예를 우리 것으로 만들었다. 《武藝圖譜通志》는 우리 민족의 위대한 유산이며 동양 3국 무예의 총화 내지는 3국의 무예를 창조적으로 흡수해서 발전시켰다. The purposes of this study are to compure the contents and the editions in Martial Arts books titled Kihyosinseo(紀效新書), Muyehebo(武藝諸譜), Muyedobotonggi(武藝圖譜通志). In order to identify the similarties and differences of those books, all historical procedures to be published and translations contents were analyzed.In the comparison of contents, only 6 skills were analyzed, because those 6 skills were commonly described in each book.In the results of these comparative analyses, findings about Korean and Chinese typical martial arts book are as follows.First, Muyejebo was made by selectiong 6 skills from Kihyosinseo which were regarded as weak points of Korean army training in a hand-to-hand fight during Japanes invation of Korea in 1592. It was used the editoon of Kihyosinseo in which the introduction was written by Wangsejeong(王世貞) in 1566.Second, Kihyosinseo, Muyejebo, Muyedobotonggi showed the 6 skill`s descriptives commonly. The content of those 6 skills in Muyejebo and Muyedobotonggi are almost same but more easier expressed understandable than Kihyosinseo.Third, Muyedobotonggi was differed from Muyejebo that was contributed to develop 24 skills referdnced by 145 sources such as Kihyosinseo(紀效新書), Mubiji(武備志), Yongbieachunga(龍飛御天歌), Dogumrok(刀劍錄), Waegi(倭志), ctc. And eventually those skills were adjusted into Korean traditions. Therefore, Muyedobotonggi should be regarded as a great inheritance in Korea and its creativity on oriental 3 nations` unification in Martial Artials should be standed out to understand of the developmental history in Asian Martial Arts.

체육사학 : 최근 한국 체육사 연구의 경향 분석

이종원(ChongWeonLee),나영일(YoungIlNa) 한국체육학회 2005 한국체육학회지 Vol.44 No.6

The purpose of this paper was to analyze a tendency of the recent study of sport history in Korea. This study selected 242 papers published in Korean Journal of Physical Education and Korean Journal of History of Physical Education, Sport and Dance(1996~2005). And These papers were analyzed in three dimensions. First, those papers were classified in respect of studying areas and times interested by scholars. Second, they were classified in respect of selecting tendency of historical materials used by scholars. Third, those papers were classified into 8 groups of studying thesis composed of methodological essays on sport history, historical approach of thought of physical education and physical training, history of sport policy and sport system, historical approach of sport culture, history of traditional sport and martial arts, history of acceptance and education of modern sport, history of sport items and events, and biographies of sport figures and records of sport organization.The result of this study were as follow :(1) Korean Sport History was more concentrated by scholars than Asian Sport History and Western Sport History. And in case of Korean Sport History, after modern time was more attracted by scholars than before modern time. On the contrary, in case of Asian Sport History, before modern time was more attracted than after modern time. In case of Western Sport History, there was not impartial.(2) In respect of the selecting tendency of historical materials, many papers were dependent on second materials.(3) In respect of classification of studying thesis, sport historians have impartial concerns about 8 groups.To conclude, through analyzing a tendency of the recent study of sport history in Korea, there was a hopeful result and a disappointed problem simultaneously.

운동선수 구타 실태 및 개선방안

권순용(SunYongKwon),나영일(YoungIlNa),박일혁(IlHyeokPark),권성호(SungHoKwon),조욱연(WoogYeonJo),김종호(JongHoKim),주종미(JongMiJoo) 한국체육학회 2011 한국체육학회지 Vol.50 No.6

이 연구는 운동부에서 일어나는 구타 실태를 알아보고, 이를 바탕으로 구타 근절대책을 수립하는데 목적이 있다. 이를 위하여 본 조사는 2010년 현재 대한체육회에 등록된 전국 초·중·고 및 대학·일반 운동선수와 지도자 및 학부모를 모집단으로 선정하였다. 등록선수 수와 비율, 성별 및 종목(개인/단체)을 고려하여 총 2,041명(운동선수 1,734명, 지도자 202명, 학부모 105명)의 설문지를 분석하였다. 최종으로 수집된 설문지 자료의 항목별 단순 빈도 표와 백분율을 계산하기 위해 SPSS(Version 17.0) 프로그램을 이용하여 기술하였다. 본 연구의 내용은 첫째, 과거 구타와 최근 구타 경험과의 비교를 바탕으로 운동선수 구타 실태를 파악해 보았고, 둘째, 운동선수, 지도자, 학부모 등 운동부 관계자들의 인식 및 태도를 바탕으로 구타가 반복되는 원인을 분석해 보았으며, 마지막으로 각 주체들이 인식하고 있는 구타 근절 대책을 제시하였다. 운동선수 구타는 선수 개인만의 문제가 아니라 학교, 가정, 지역사회, 정부 등 여러 가지 요소가 결합되어 나타나는 복합적인 문제이다. 따라서 구타 예방을 위해서는 그 동안 지향되어온 단편적인 시각에서 탈피하여 운동부 주체들을 모두 포괄할 수 있는 다각적인 방법을 동원한 대책수립이 모색되어야 할 것이다. The purpose of this study was to investigate the actual condition of athletes' experiences on physical violence and suggest alternatives to eradicate physical violence in sports. To achieve this purpose, all athletes except professionals, coaches, athlete's parents were targeted and finally a total of 2,041 respondents(1, 734 athletes, 202 coaches, 105 parents) were selected to conduct this study. The gathered data were examined by frequency analysis using SPSS(Version 17.0). The main topics of this study were as follows. Firstly, this study identified the actual condition of physical violence among athletes based on the comparison of past and recent experiences. Secondly, this study reviewed the causes of athletes' experiences on physical violence through analyzing the perception and attitude of athletes, coaches and parents. Finally, it proposed some suggestions to solve the physical violence in sports. Physical violence in sports is a complicated issue that combines various elements, such as personal characteristics, homes, school, and the local community. Therefore, it is important that solutions for the prevention of violence must be multifaceted, including all stakeholders.