http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
김세화 한국분석철학회 2007 철학적 분석 Vol.0 No.16
In this paper, I raise objections to Lee’s “Millian Theories of Fictional Terms and Inferential Semantics”. To do this, I reconstruct the problems about fictional names (empty names), and I maintain that we need to hear more from Lee with respect to these, and that his own objection to Walton also applies to his theory as well. I conclude that without more explanations and justification from Lee, we cannot accept his claim that his inferential semantics provides the most satisfactory semantics for fictional names. 본 논문에서 필자는 이병덕의 “허구적 이름에 대한 밀주의 이론과 추론주의 의미론”에 대해 반론을 제시한다. 이를 위해 필자는 허구적 이름과 관련한 문제점들을 필자 나름대로 재구성하여, 이 문제들과 관련하여 보다 자세한 보완 설명과 해결책 제시가 필요하다는 것을 보이고, 또한 이병덕이 월튼에 대해 제기했던 반론이 그 자신의 입장에도 역시 적용됨을 보인다. 필자는 이병덕이 제시한 추론주의적 설명은 좀더 많은 설명과 정당화가 필요한 아직은 불완전한 설명으로서, 허구적 이름에 대한 가장 적절한 의미론을 제시한다는 그의 결론을 받아들일 수 없다고 결론내린다.
굴 양식장에 자생하는 미더덕, 진주담치, 따개비류의 먹이 경쟁에 관한 연구
김세화 龍仁大學校 2003 용인대학교 논문집 Vol.21 No.-
Food competition among four kinds of attached organisms ( Crassostrea sp., Styela clava, Mytilus eculis and Cirripedian sp.) in the oyster bed. Tongyong was investigated in November 2001. During 72 hour investigation, phytoplankton standing crops in control chamber decreased from 16.298.5cells/l (mean value of three chambers) to 8398.8cells/l in first 24 hours. Next 24 hours, it decreased to 5254.7cells/l, and 4891.2 cells/l, gradually. Filtering rate for each organism was 7,659cells/g dry weight/day for Crassostrea sp, 7,770cells/g dry weight/day for Styela clava and 1,558cells/g dry weight/day Cirripedian sp., respectively. No such a clear filtering rate was observed for Mytilus eculis . The conclusion is that short term experiment might be more effective than long term one for the measurement of filtering rate. experimental bag of 04-1㎛ pore size is also needed. Drastic decrease in chlorophyll-a contents and standing crops seems to be due to the artificial concentration. then spring bloom period is recommended to be an experimental period.
김세화,조규희 용인대학교 자연과학연구소 2002 自然科學硏究所論文誌 Vol.7 No.1
Investigation on zooplankton dynamics was carried out to know seasonal variation in zooplankton fauna in waters off Yongduck, Korea, Quantitative zooplankton samples were collected seasonally in winter, spring, summer and autumn in ten selected stations in Yongduck waters. A total of 79 taxa of zooplankton occurred in waters off during the study. Copepods showed the prosperity in species number (44 species as 67.1% of total number of zooplankton taxa occurred). Seasonally, 39 taxa occurred in the winter, 33 in spring, 48 in summer and 56 in autumn, respectively. Mean abundance of ten stations was recorded to be the minimum of 966 indiv.m^-3 in th winter and the maximum of 5,428 indiv.m^-3 in summer. Dominant zooplanters were Parcalanus indicus, Oithona similis, Oikopluera dioika, Firitillaria sp. and Noctilluca scintillans. Spatial distribution showed to be the lowest in stn 1. which located hust a front of the Chucksan fisheries harbour in Yongduck. It seems to be affected by the input of contaminants excreted from the harbour. Whereas the nutrients input possibly promotes the increase of primary and secondary production in near-shore waters of the harbour.
『차이를 만들지 않는다(Makes No Difference)』는 논증과 반사실적 조건문에 대한 분석
김세화 한국논리학회 2007 論理硏究 Vol.10 No.2
In this paper, first I examine the “Makes No Difference” argument and Alan Baker’s objections to it. In his objections to the MND argument, Baker relies on the account of counterfactuals provided by Igal Kvart. So I criticize Kvart’s account of counterfactuals and thereby raise objections to Baker. To do this, I argue that Kvart’s account of counterfactuals, in particular his account of counterlegals, is inadequate by showing that it is incompatible with actual scientific practice and actual philosophical practice involved in debates about the Fine-Tuning argument. I conclude that Baker’s criticism of MND argument does not hold because his criticism relies on Kvart’s inadequate account of counterlegals. 본 논문에서 필자는 먼저 “차이를 만들지 않는다(Makes No Difference)”는 논증(줄여서 MND 논증)을 소개하고 이에 대한 앨런 베이커(Alan Baker)의 반론을 자세히 살펴본다. MND 논증, 특히 그 전제를 제대로 평가하기 위해서는 반사실적 조건문에 대한 분석이 필요한데, 베이커는 이를 위해 이갈 크바크(Igal Kvart)의 분석을 이용한다. 이에 필자는 크바트의 분석을 비판함으로써 이에 의존한 베이커의 주장을 비판한다. 이를 위해 필자는 Fine-Tuning 논증을 예로 삼아, 크바트의 반사실적 조건문에 대한 분석, 특히 그의 반법칙적 조건문에 대한 분석은 실제 과학자들의 논의와도 상충되며, 이 과학자들의 논의를 바탕으로 한 철학적 논쟁과도 상충되기 때문에 그의 분석을 받아들일 수 없음을 보인다. 이를 통해 필자는 크바트의 분석에 의존하여 MND 논증을 공격한 베이커의 결론도 마찬가지로 받아들일 수 없다는 것을 보인다.
Instantaneous Temporal Parts and Time Travel
김세화,Takeshi Sakon 한국논리학회 2017 論理硏究 Vol.20 No.1
The standard definition of an instantaneous temporal part cannot properly deal with cases involving time travel. This paper provides a new definition of an instantaneous temporal part by appealing to David Lewis's distinction between external time and personal time. The new definition avoids the problems because it does not allow more than one instantaneous temporal part of an object at each moment of its personal time. We argue that this new definition, combined with our new perdurantist semantic thesis, deals with cases of time travel successfully.