RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • 경남지역 고등학교 학생의 직접 교육비와 간접 교육비 분석

        최청일,구태 東亞大學校 學生生活硏究所 1994 學生硏究 Vol.22 No.-

        The aim of this paper compares both the public and private costs of academic and vdcational upper secondary school students. We also compare both the public and private costs among vocational upper secondary school students : commercial, agricultural, technical, aquatic. The sample of students used in the study were selected from academic and vocational upper secondary school. Two types of data were requried to carry out this study; data on public cost and data on private cost. Data on public cost were collected from Educational Board in Kyung-nam. To acquire data on private cost the questionaire was administered to 1800 students. The findings divided by public and private cost per student are as follows. 1. Government-borne public costs were higher for vocational educational students relative to academic educational students. Among vocational students fishery school students were the highest. 2. Educational costs which are publicly borne by students and parents were for higher academic students relative to vocational students because fees and tuitions were high. 3. Academic students paid direct private costs much more than vocational students,but we must keep an eye on commercial students paying direct private costs much more than academic students. 4. Total educational costs per student, which consist of government-borne costs,tuitions and fees, direct private costs, were higher for academic students relative to vocational students. Among vocational students commercial students were higher for other vocational students. 5. When comparing total educational costs per student with students'social-economic status. There was little difference. 6. Indirect private costs were higher for academic students relative to vocational students. Among vocational students. Among vocational students indirect cost of fishery students students. were lower in contrast to other vocational students. 7. Parents' occupation and family income were little related with private costs. But parents' educationwas related with private cost. In sum, the analysis to cover total education costs has shown that the more expensive educational program is the academic one-Govemment-borne public cost was only higher for vocational education than that of academic education, whereas private and indirect costs were higher for academic students. In monetary outlay academic students paid 280,000won in average more than vocational students peryear. Among vocational students the order which was much paid direct costs was commercial, agricultural, technical, aquatic. In terms of indirect cost academic students paid 31687won more than vocational students per day. But except for aquatic students there was little difference in indirect cost.

      • 敎育投資의 意思決定 基準分析

        崔淸一,天九泰 東亞大學校 學生生活硏究所 1992 學生硏究 Vol.20 No.-

        From the perspective of economics, educational decision can be thought of as producing human capital;that is, as embodying knowledge in students that has subsequent market value through increased labor market skills, broadly conceived, upon entry into the work force. The purpose of ths paper is to discuss rational decision criteria for human capital investment. The educational decision criteria can be divided into micro approaches and macro approaches. The micro approaches consist of rates of return, internal rate of return, net present value, benefit-cost ratio, cost-effectiveness. The macro approaches involve residual growth, manpower planning, social demand approach. Rate of return is that percentage rate of return that discounts the stream of earnings expected by the student over his life cycle back to its present value and equate them to the total educational costs compounded forward to the date of graduation. The internal rate of return is that discount rate which equates the present values of benefits and costs or the same things as sayings it is that discount rate at which the difference between the discounted value of benefits and the discounted value of costs is equal to zero. The net present value is the difference between the present values of benifits and of costs. We had better select all projets where the present value of benefits exceeds the present value of costs. The benefit-cost ratio means that the ratio of the present value of benefits to the present value of costs exceeds unity. A project will be worthwhile whenever B_0/C_0>1. Cost-effetiveness analysis is a technique for measuring the relationship between the total inputs, or costs, of a project or activity, and its outputs or objectives. This method may be employed to make choice of a project from among the alternatives, where programe effects are not valued in money terms and where imputing values will be difficult. The sources of economic growth are not only physical capital and labor but also education, health, on-the-job training. The contribution of these latter groups of factors to econonic growth is that part of the growth which can't be explained by increases in physical capital and labor inputs. The unexplained part of growth is generally termed residual growth. Manpower planning attempts to relate manpower needs of the economy to manpower supply through education and training when planning economic development. Social demand approach refers to the demand for education emerging from the needs and aspirations of individual persons as contrasted the educational demand based on the personnel requirements of society. The above criteria should be put educational decision in human capital investment into use.

      • 후기 중등교육과 고등교육 선택의 경제적 분석

        최청일,구태 東亞大學校 學生生活硏究所 1993 學生硏究 Vol.21 No.-

        In the early 1970s, with the availability of individual student data empirical research on higher education demand shifted to analyses of the individual's decision over whether and where to attend college. In these empirical studies we estimate wheter an individual goes to college or gets a job. At the same time, preference, price, income are chosen variables to determine college-going behavior. The aim of this paper is to investigate an individual's college-going behavior in high school using these three variables. The data showing students' attributes were collected from students, who graduated from Kim-hae High School in 1990 and 1991. IQ, parents' education and occupation, marks were selected from their personal records. A survey Questionaire was used to the sample of 437 students attending now in Kim-hae High School and their parents. The questionaire was produced to know the influences of income and price when going to college. The questionaire returned were statistically treated to obtain answers to the question stated for this study.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼