RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        설명의무와 지도의무 -설명의무에 관한 최근 판례의 동향-

        안법영 ( Bup Young Ahn ),백경희 ( Kyoung Hee Baek ) 안암법학회 2013 안암 법학 Vol.0 No.40

        The duty to explain(Aufklarungspflicht, informed consent) in medical living relationship has the principle of the rule for duty and the benefit and protection of the law unlike duty in a general legal living relationship. Therefore, the duty to explain a medical procedure without the patient`s valid prior consent if the configuration is found to infringe on the patient`s self-determination. The Supreme Court`s recent judgement has imposed to the doctor a duty, How to care so that the patient can be properly recovered obligations. However, there is some doubt that this judgement of the Supreme Court is equal to the duty of explain. Because this is doctor`s notice about the convalescence methods observed by patient during or after medical treatment, the Supreme Court`s judgement corresponds to medical duty of care, which is required in medical treatment. It is required by the medical duty of care. Patients` self-determination is not a problem for him and patients should be followed for the treatment of diseases. Eventually difference between the two duties appears in the legal structure, the content, the transition period, the legal effect of any violations, the burden of proof. So, the latter must access to a separate description of the two duties and shall be named as ``Duty to instruct``.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼