RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 男子籠球 競技 內容에 關한 硏究

        박양후 建國大學校 大學院 1990 국내석사

        RANK : 247631

        The '89 International Invitation Basketball Tournaments were held in Seoul, 1989. The following research and Analysis of the game for 8 excenent teams (Korea, Austria, Chinese Taipei, Canada, China, U.S.S.R, U.S.A., Japan) was described. Ⅰ. Intended to study the items as follows: 1) Field Goal 2) Three point Goal 3) Free Throw 4) Rebound Ball Catch 5) Turn Over 6) Foul 7) Assist 8) Steal 9) Total score as well as Lost score Ⅱ. Conclusion Each item, the average record of winner team and loser team and the record compared the highest record team with the lowest record team among 8 teams are written. The results as follows : 1) Field Goal The successful rate of field goal was 46% in average in each game. The winner team : 50% The Loser team : 42% Korea, the highest team, was 52% Austria, the Lowest team, was 39% 2) Three point Goal The successful rate of Three point Goal was 34% in average in each game. The winner team : 37% The Loser team : 30% U.S.S.R., the highest team, was 41% Austria, the Lowest team, was 25% 3) Free Throw The successful rate of free Throw was 70% in average in each game. The winner team was 71% The Loser team was 68% Korea, the highest team, was 80% Chinese Taipei, the lowest team, was 59% 4) Rebound Ball Catch The total number of Rebound Ball Catch was 30.8 times in average in each game. The winner team was 31.9 times (O.R. : 10.9, D.R.: 21). The Loser team was 29,8 times (O.R.: 11.6, D.R.: 18.2) U.S.A., the highest team, was 37 times (O.R.: 14, D.R.: 23). Japan, the lowest teams, were 24.6 times (O.R. : 7.4, D.R.: 15.2). 5) Turn Over The mean number of Turn Over was 16.3 times. The winner team was 16.1 times (V10: 3, LST: 13.2). The Loser times was 16.6 times (V10: 2.8, LST: 13.8). Korea, the highest team, was 11.2 times (V10: 2, LST: 9.2). 6) Foul The mean number of Foul was 20 times in average in each game. The winner team was 20 times. The Loser team was 19.8 times. Austria, the Lowest team, was 24.4 times. U.S.A., the highest team, was 20 times. 7) Assist The mean number of Assist was 9.7 times. The winner team was 10.6 times The loser team was 8.8 times China, the highest teams, were 14.6 times. Japan, the Lowest team, was 5 times. 8) Steal The mean number of steal was 8.6 times in average in each gam. The winner team was 9.5 times. The loser team was 7.7 times. China, the highest team, was 10.6 times. China Taipei, the lowest team, was 6.2 times. 9) Total Score as well as Lost Score U.S.S.R., the highest total score team in each game, was 93.2 Scores. Austria, the lowest total score team, was 65.6 scores. Japan and Austria, the lowest lost score team, was 73.2 scores. Korea, the highest lost score team was 83.4 scores.

      • 시공순서에 따른 지하철 Box 구조물 가교형 받침기초의 하중 분담특성에 관한 연구

        박양후 서울과학기술대학교 2013 국내석사

        RANK : 247631

        저탄소 녹색성장이 대두되면서 철도의 관심이 고조되고 있으며, 이에 따라서 서울은 물론 지방에서도 지하철의 건설이 증가하고 있다. 근래에는 기존에 시공된 지하철 터널 등과 상·하부로 근접 교차하는 지하구조물의 시공사례가 급증하고 있으며, 기존 구조물의 안전성을 학보하기 위해서 과다한 공사비와 사고 시 큰 피해를 유발할 가능성 또한 증가하고 있다. 기존 지하철 하부통과 공법으로 언더피닝 공법이 많이 이용되고 있으며, 공사비 및 공사기간이 문제점으로 지적되고 있다. 따라서 본 연구에는 언더피닝 공법을 개량한 가교형 받침공법에 대하여 연구를 하였으며, 가교형 받침공법은 기존 공법에 비하여 지지말뚝의 이음없이 천공 후 단단한 지지층까지 근입시켜 기존 구조물의 처짐을 최소화하여 안정성을 확보할 수 있었으며, 시공방법이 단순하고 하부 작업공간 확보가 유리하여 시공성은 언더피닝 공법에 비하여 1.5배 뛰어나며, 경제성은 1.2배 뛰어남을 알 수 있었다. 실제 시공 시 기존 구조물의 안정성을 검증하기 위하여 계측을 통하여 말뚝이 받는 하중을 측정한 결과 설계값 하고는 많은 차이가 있었으며, 설계에서의 말뚝이 받는 하중은 모든 말뚝에서 본당 535kN으로 일괄적으로 나타났으며, 계측값은 먼저 시공한 중앙부의 말뚝이 받는 하중과 나중에 시공한 주변부의 말뚝이 받는 하중이 2.1배 이상 차이가 남을 알 수 있었으며, 말뚝이 받는 하중은 지반영향 및 굴착순서에 영향을 받음을 알 수 있었다. 따라서 시공 순서를 고려한 수치해석을 수행하였으며, 계측값과 비교한 결과 먼저 시공한 중앙부에서는 99% 일치하였으며, 주변부에서는 94% 일치하였다. 말뚝이 받는 하중은 지반영향 및 굴착순서에 영향을 크게 받음을 검증 할 수 있었으며, 향후 지하철 공사 중 하부 통과 방안으로 가교형 받 In line with emerging low carbon green growth, railroad has been drawing more interest recently and thus subway construction has been on the rise throughout the nation, not to mention Seoul region. Recently number of underground structure crossing closely above or below existing subway tunnel has been increasingly growing and the cost spent to secure th safety of existing structure has been increased accordingly in line with the growing potential risk of catastrophic loss. Underpinning has been widely adopted to pass below the existing structure but the high cost and extended time still remain problematic. This study thus is intended to evaluate the temporary bridge bearing method which was developed by modifying the underpinning method. Temporary bridge bearing method, compared to existing method, is achieved by drilling without jointing bearing piles and penetrating up to stable soil level so as to secure the stability by mitigating the deflection of existing structure, which is simple and easy to secure the work space below the structure, indicating superior construct ability and cost efficiency which is 150% and 120%, respectively, higher than underpinning method. As a result of measuring the load imposed on pile to verify the stability of the structure, a considerable gap with the design value was monitored. Design load on pile was 535kN per pile but when it comes to measured value, the gap between the load on center pile previously built and the perimetric piles was found to be more than 2.1 times which indicated the load on pile was affected by ground characteristics and excavation sequency. Thus numerical analysis considering work sequency was carried out and when comparing to measured value, the figures came close 99% for center pile and 94% for perimetric piles, proving the load on pile was significantly affected by ground characteristics and excavation sequency. Thus it's necessary to perform the analysis considering the work sequency when applying temporary bridge bearing method for excavating below the existing subway structure.

      • 신활력사업 추진상의 문제점과 개선 방안에 관한 연구

        박양후 湖南大學校 福祉行政大學院 2006 국내석사

        RANK : 247615

        신활력사업은 낙후지역 발전정책이다. 지난 30여 년간의 압축 성장 과정에서 수도권과 일부 대도시를 제외한 대부분의 지역은 지역경제가 침체하고 인구가 유출됨으로써 활력이 없는 발전의 사각지대로 존재해 왔다. 이들 지역에 고용과 일자리를 창출하여 새로운 활력을 불어넣어 '신(新)활력 지역'으로 변화시켜 지역균형발전을 도모하겠다는 사업이다. 그런 의미에서 신활력 지역이란 용어는 법률상의 용어라기보다는 참여정부의 정책적 의지가 담긴 용어인 셈이다. 신활력사업은 기존의 낙후지역개발과 달리 지역 스스로가 지역혁신체계(RIS:Regional Innovation System)를 구축하여 자체적으로 사업계획을 수립하는 상향식 발전전략을 추구하고 있다. 사업내용도 기존의 SOC 건설이나 생활·정주환경개선에서 탈피하여 지역혁신역량 강화를 위한 프로그램을 개발하고 지원함으로써 정부는 신활력산업이 기존의 낙후지역사업과 차별되면서도 합리적으로 연계되는 시책이라고 강조하고 있다. 정부가 기존의 개발방식을 수정하여 새로운 정책방향에서 낙후지역을 지원하는 신 활력사업을 추진하고 나섰다. 그동안 낙후지역개발은 사업추진 주체가 각 부처에 분산되어 있는 것은 물론 개발사업의 중복성 때문에 사업의 효율성과 효과성을 얻기 어렵다는 지적을 받아왔다. 무엇보다도 기존의 정책들은 물리적 개발에 치우쳐 지역의 내생적 발전역량을 키우는데 소홀하였다는 점이 가장 큰 실패요인이었다고 할 수 있다. 이 연구에서는 신활력사업 추진 상에서 발생하는 제도, 추진과정, 자문평가와 지역선정, 자료지원 등에서 발생한 문제점들을 도출하고 그에 대한 정책적 대안을 제시하여 낙후지역개발 사업의 성공과 더불어 신 활력사업 추진에 도움을 주고자 한다. New vitality business is development policy of backward area. Most area except capital region and part big city had existed to depressed detachment of development by regional economy gets stagnant and population is outpoured, vitality carries on the back for last 30 years. This business is that change as "New vitality business" and development of balanced region inspiring new vitality inventing employment and job in these area. In such meaning, New vitality area is term that participation government's political will of term is filled rather than juridical term. This business is seeking upstice development strategy that area oneself constructs RIS (Rigional Innovation System) and establish plan of operation by itself differently with existent backward community development. Contents of business develop and support program for area reform capacity reinforcement exuviating in existent SOC construction or life, domiciliation environment improvement, so government is emphasizing that"New vitality business" is measure that associates as being differentiated with existent business of backward region rationally. Government began to propel "New vitality business" that modify existent development method and support backward region from new policy direction. So far, " backward region development" is that business propulsion subject has been scattered to each post naturally because of doubleness of development work area difficult to get efficiency of business and effect attribute receive. First of all, Most failure factor of old policies lean in physical development and neglect to develop endogenous development capacity of region. Wish to draw problems that happen in policy, propulsion process, inquiry estimation and regional selection, data support etc. which happen in propeling "New vitality business" in this research, also Wish to present the political project and help in "New vitality business" propulsion along with success of business of backward regional development.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼